Skip to main content

Analysis of Unsteady Airfoils at Low Speeds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Flow Modulation and Fluid—Structure Interaction at Airplane Wings

Part of the book series: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design ((NNFM,volume 84))

  • 372 Accesses

Summary

In this study exemplary results on the influence of two fundamental unsteady parameters, the reduced frequency k and the non-dimensional pitching rate α+, on the transition from a steady to an unsteady flow field around the reference airfoil BAC3–11/RES/30/21 are presented using experimental and numerical techniques. The tools used are described and their results verified with each other. On the experimental side, water tunnel experiments are conducted using particle-imagevelocimetry (PIV) and strain-gauge-balance (SGB) measurement techniques. The experimental results are enhanced by two-dimensional laminar unsteady numerical Navier-Stokes simulations of the experiments with a state of the art code from the Featflow package. The numerical simulations are found to agree well with experimental results, despite three-dimensional effects and a relatively high Reynolds number of Re c = 16000. An influence of the reduced frequency on the lift coefficient at a local non-dimensional pitching rate value of α+= 0 for the relevant range is not detected, while for the drag and the pitching moment a decrease and an increase respectively is observed. Nevertheless a phase difference for the lift with increasing reduced frequency was calculated, which appears at least above k = 0.14 and indicates unsteady effects. The same was observed for the pitching moment. The effects of the airfoil camber are clearly seen during the phase of negative angle of attack, inducing leading and trailing edge separation. The flow separation regions are discussed and the formation of a triple vortex system at the trailing edge in the pitching up motion of the airfoil is identified in the experimental and numerical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bublitz, P.: Geschichte der Entwicklung der Aeroelastik in Deutschland von den Anfängen bis 1945. DFVLR-Mitteilung 86–15, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennet, R. M.; Edwards, J. W.: An Overview of Recent Developments in Computational Aeroelasticity. AIAA Paper 1998–2421, 29th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Albuquerque, NM (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, A.; Hefner, J.: Future Challenges and Opportunities in Aerodynamics. ICAS 2000–0.2.1, ICAS 2000 Congress (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mccroskey, W. J.: Unsteady Airfoils. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 14, pp. 285–311, (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akamatsu, T.: Application of shock tube technology to studies of hydrodynamics. Shock Tube and Shock Wave Research (ed. Ahlborn, Hertzberg, Russel), University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moir, I.R.: Measurements on a Two-Dimensional Airfoil with High-Lift Devices. AGARD-AR-303, A21–A22, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wernert, P.; Geissler, W.; Raffel, M.; Kompenhans, J.: Experimental and numerical investigations of dynamic stall on a pitching airfoil. AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 5, p. 982–989, (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raffel, M.; Willert, C.; Kompenhans, J.: Particle Image Velocimetry: A practical guide. Springer-Verlag, (1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Wernert, P.; Favier, D.: Considerations about the phase averaging method with application to ELDV and PIV measurements over pitching airfoils. Experiments in Fluids 27, p. 473–483, Springer-Verlag (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wernert, P.; Koerber, G.; Wietrich, F. et al.: Demonstration by PIV of the Non-Reproduceability of the Flow Field Around an Airfoil Pitching Under Deep Dynamic Stall Conditions and Consequences Thereof Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 2, p. 125–135, (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adrian, A. J.: Particle-Image Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechnics, Vol. 23, p. 261–304(1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weigand, A.: Review of some Novel Measurement Techniques for Fluid Dynamics Studies. DGLR Jahrestagung, Göttingen, Germany (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Willert, C. E.; Gharib, M.: Digital particle image velocimetry. Experiment in Fluids 10, p. 181–193, (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shand, A. M.: The Investigation, Development and Optimisation of Global Laser Diagnostics for Combustion and Related Flow Applications. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turek, S.; Becker, C.: Featflow. Finite element software for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. User Manual. Release 1.1. Technical Report, University of Heidelberg, Germany (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Turek, S.: Efficient solvers for incompressible flow problems: An algorithmic approach in view of computational aspects. LNCSE 6, Springer Verlag (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schäfer, M; Turek, S.: Benchmark Computations of Laminar Flow Around a Cylinder In: Flow Simulation with High-Performance Computers II, Ed. Hirschel, E. H., NNFM Vol. 52, Vieweg Verlag (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hesse, M.; Britten, G.; Ballmann, J.: A Multi-Block Grid Deformation Algorithm for Aeroelastic Analysis. B. K. Soni, J. Häuser, JE Thomson, P. Eiseman (eds.), Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Field Simulations, Proc. 7th Int. Conf., pp. 161–170 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wall, W. A.: Fluid structure interaction with stabilized finite elements. Institute of Structural Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, PhD Thesis (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohmi, K.; Coutanceau, M.; Loc, T. et al.: Vortex formation around an oscillating and translating airfoil at large incidences. J. Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 211, pp. 37–60 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker, J. M.; Helin, H. E.; Strickland, J. H.: An Experimental Investigation of an Airfoil Undergoing Large-Amplitude Pitching Motions. AIAA Journal, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 1141–1142 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Theodorsen, T.: General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter NACA Report 496 (1935).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bertran, X.: Separation Effects on the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Oscillating Airfoils at Low Speeds. Doctoral Thesis, Stoßwellenlabor, Aachen University (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bertrán, X., Olivier, H., Turek, S. (2003). Analysis of Unsteady Airfoils at Low Speeds. In: Ballmann, J. (eds) Flow Modulation and Fluid—Structure Interaction at Airplane Wings. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 84. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44866-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44866-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53613-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44866-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics