Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 219))

Abstract

With the desire to manage imprecise and vague information in evidential reasoning, several attempts have been made to generalize the Dempster–Shafer (D–S) theory to deal with fuzzy sets. However, the important principle of the D–S theory, that the belief and plausibility functions are treated as lower and upper probabilities, is no longer preserved in these generalizations. A generalization of the D–S theory in which this principle is maintained is described. It is shown that computing the degree of belief in a hypothesis in the D–S theory can be formulated as an optimization problem. The extended belief function is thus obtained by generalizing the objective function and the constraints of the optimization problem. To combine bodies of evidence that may contain vague information, Dempster’s rule is extended by 1) combining generalized compatibility relations based on the possibility theory, and 2) normalizing combination results to account for partially conflicting evidence. Our generalization not only extends the application of the D–S theory but also illustrates a way that probability theory and fuzzy set theory can be integrated in a sound manner in order to deal with different kinds of uncertain information in intelligent systems

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • J. Pearl, “On evidential reasoning in a hierarchy of hypothesis,” Artificial Intell., vol. 28, no. 1, Feb. 1986, pp. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Lesh, An Evidential Theory Approach to Judgment-based Decision Making, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Duke Univ., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Fuzzy control ensures a smooth ride,” Hitachi 1987, pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets and information granularity,” in Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, 1979, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ishizuka, K. S. Fu, and J. T. P. Yao, “Inference procedures and uncertainty for the problem-reduction method,” Inform. Sci., vol. 28, 1982, pp. 179–206.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. Yager, “Generalized probabilities of fuzzy events from fuzzy belief structures,” Inform. Sci., vol. 28, 1982, pp. 45–62.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • H. Ogawa and K. S. Fu, “An inexact inference for damage assessment of existing structures,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 22, 1985, pp. 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,” Ann. Math. Stat., vol. 38, pp. 325–339, 1967.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • G. Shafer, Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • G. Shafer, “Belief functions and possibility measures,” tech. report working paper no. 163, University of Kansas, School of Business, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh, “Possibility theory and soft data analysis,” in Mathematical Frontiers of the Social and Policy Sciences, L. Cobb and R. M. Thrall, Eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1981, pp. 69–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 3–28, 1978.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibility Theory. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • P. Smets, “The degree of belief in a fuzzy event,” Inform. Sci., vol. 25, pp. 1–19, 1981.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I,” Inform. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 199–249, 1975.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy languages and their relation to human and machine intelligence,” Proc. Int. Conf. Man Comput., S. Karger, Ed. Bordeaux, France: Basel, 1972, pp. 130–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh, “Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings,” Information Sci., vol. 3, pp. 177–200, 1971.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D. Dubois and H. Prade, “On several representations of an uncertain body of evidence,” in Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes, M. M. Gupta and E. Sanchez, Ed. New York: North-Holland, 1982, pp. 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh, “A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the Rule of Combination,” AI Magazine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–90, Summer 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yen, J. (2008). Generalizing the Dempster–Shafer Theory to Fuzzy Sets. In: Yager, R.R., Liu, L. (eds) Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25381-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44792-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics