Advertisement

Extending Commonality Analysis for Embedded Control System Families

  • Alan Stephenson
  • Darren Buttle
  • John McDermid
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1951)

Abstract

Families of systems are prevalent in software engineering, and many techniques are available for the analysis and implementation of such families. Embedded systems families provide additional constraints on these techniques, and safety-critical systems families constrain them even further. An existing family analysis technique is combined with a layering scheme to structure the selection of variations and the introduction of detail within those constraints. Application of this new technique produces software which is specified and configured during development, within a fixed execution architecture which reflects the common aspects of systems within that family.

Keywords

Embed System Software Architecture System Family Product Family Architectural Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burns, A., Wellings, A.: Hard Real-Time HOOD: A Structured Design Method for Hard Real-Time Ada Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coplien, J., Hoffman, D., Weiss, D.: Commonality and Variability in Software Engineering. IEEE Software 15(6), 37–45 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    JIMCOM. The Official Handbook of MASCOT. Technical report, Joint IECCA MUF (MASCOT User’s Forum) Committee (June 1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mannion, M., Keepence, B., Kaindl, H., et al.: Reusing Single System Requirements from Application Family Requirements. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of Software Engineering, May 1999, pp. 453–463 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simpson, H.R.: The MASCOT Method. Software Engineering Journal 1(3), 103–120 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vickers, A., Tongue, P., Smith, J.: Complexity and its Management in Requirements Engineering. In: INCOSE UK Annual Symposium — Getting to Grips with Complexity, Coventry, UK (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Stephenson
    • 1
  • Darren Buttle
    • 1
  • John McDermid
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of York, HeslingtonYorkUK

Personalised recommendations