Advertisement

Dependency Navigation in Product Lines Using XML

  • Douglas Stuart
  • Wonhee Sull
  • T. W. Cook
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1951)

Abstract

MCC’s Software and Systems Engineering Productivity (SSEP) Project brings together emerging software engineering technology in architecture definition, analysis and generation, product family engineering, and rationale capture to enable organizations to achieve unprecedented levels of productivity and reuse. One of the central requirements for architecture-based product line development is the capability to efficiently and effectively navigate between related artifacts. This involves navigation both between product line artifacts and application artifacts, and between artifacts associated with successive development phases at each level. This navigation supports automated identification, selection and generation of artifacts, as well as manual development activities. This paper describes the Architecture Description Language (ADL) and toolset used by the SSEP project, and its support for linking and navigation in a product line development environment.

Keywords

Product Line Product Family Application Architecture Architecture Description Language Domain Engineer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A framework for classifying and comparing architecture description languages. In: Proceedings of the Sixth European Software Engineering Conference together with Fifth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, September 1997, pp. 60–76 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garlan, D., Monroe, R., Wile, D.: ACME: An architecture description interchange language. In: Proceedings of CASCON 1997 (November 1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garshol, L.M.: Introduction to XML (May 1998), http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~larsga/download/xml/xml~eng.html
  4. 4.
    Pruitt, S., Stuart, D., Sull, W., Cook, T.W.: The Merit of XML as an Architecture Description Language Meta-Language, Position Paper for WICSA, San Antonio (February 1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kimber, E.: A tutorial introduction to sgml architectures. Technical report, ISOGEN International Corp (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boehm, B., Bose, P., Horowitz, E., Lee, M.J.: Software requirements negotiation and renegotiation aids: A theory-w based spiral approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE-17), Seattle (April 1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sull, W.: Investigation on variability in product line engineering (1999) (In Preparation)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Stuart
    • 1
  • Wonhee Sull
    • 1
  • T. W. Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC)AustinU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations