Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ))

Abstract

A research carried out in the framework of the knowledge logistics lies in the base of the chapter. As a result of the research an approach addressing the knowledge logistics problem was developed. The approach considers the problem as a problem of configuring a knowledge source network that is assumed to consist of distributed heterogeneous knowledge sources. An implementation of the approach was put into practice through its realization in the system “KSNet”. Distribution and heterogeneity of the knowledge sources determine a distributed and scalable character to the problem of the network configuring. Such nature of the problem causes for the system to have a multi-agent architecture. This chapter presents a prototype of the developed agent community implementation in the system “KSNet” and a constraint-based protocol designed for the agents’ negotiation. An application of the developed agent community to coalition-based operations support and the protocol are illustrated via case studies of a mobile hospital configuration as a task of health service logistics and automotive supply network configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, M.B., Deutsch, O.L., Hall, W.D., et al. (2000), “Closed-loop operation of large-scale enterprise: application of a decomposition approach,” Proceedings of DARPA ISO Symposium on Advanced in Enterprise Control (AEC), pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • AKT project web site (2002), http://www.aktors.org/.

  • Blythe, J., Kim, J., Ramachandran, S., and Gil, Y. (2001), “An integrated environment for knowledge acquisition,” Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, Y. and Abidi, S.S.R. (2001), “Capturing tacit healthcare knowledge via an intelligent infostructure featuring knowledge standardization and repair mechanisms,” Medicinska Informatika (Journal of the Croatian Society for Medical Informatics), vol. 5, pp. 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clin-Act (Clinical Activity). The ON9. 3 Library of Ontologies: Ontology Group of IP-CNR (a part of the Institute of Psychology of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) ) (2000), http://saussure.irmkant.rm.cnr.it/onto/.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoAX - Coalition Agents eXperiment. Coalition Research Home Page (2002), http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/project/coax/.

  • COGITO: E-Commerce with Guaiding Agents Based on Personal ised Interaction Tools (2002), http://www.ipsi.fhg.de/-cogito.

  • Cunningham, M. (2001), “Buyer (and Seller). Be Aware,” DB2Magazine, vol. 6, is. 2, pp. 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • DARPA Advanced Logistics Project web site (2002), http://www.darpa.mil/iso/alp.

  • Davis, R. and Smith, R.G. (1983), “Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 63–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzbor, M., Paralic, J., and Paralic, M. (2000), “knowledge management in a distributed organisation,” Proceedings of BASYS ’2000–4th IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems in Manufacturing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, ISBN 0–7923–7958–6, pp. 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIPA-OS toolkit (2002), http://fipa-os.sourceforge.net/.

  • Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA) Documentation (2002), http://www.fipa.org.

  • Gorodetski, V., Karsayev, O., Kotenko, I., and Khabalov, A. (2002), “Software development kit for multi-agent systems design and implementation,” Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2296, pp. 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, H., Davies, A., Macauley, B., and Zancanato, R. (1999), “Large scale knowledge based systems for airborne decision support,” Knowledge-Based Systems Journal, vol. 12, pp. 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hpkb-Upper-Level-Kernel-Latest: Upper CycIHPKB IKB Ontology with links to SENSUS, Version 1.4, February, 1998. Ontolingua Ontology Server (1998), http://www-ksl-svc.stanford.edu:5915.

  • Hummingbird web site (2002), http://www.hummingbird.com/products/eip/.

  • ILOG Corporate Web-site (2002), http://www.ilog.com.

  • ILOG Corporate Web-site (2002), http://www.ilog.com.

  • Jarrar, Y., Schiuma, G., and Zairi, M. (2002), “Defining organisational knowledge: a best practice perspective,” Proceedings of VI International Conference on “Quality Innovation Knowledge”, pp. 486–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Java Agent DEvelopment Framework JADE (2002), http://sharon.cselt.it/projects/jade/

  • Kim, J., Ling, R., and Will, P. (1997), “Ontology engineering for active catalog,” Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Using AI in Electronic Commerce, Virtual Organizations and Enterprise Knowledge Management to Reengineer the Corporation, pp. 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maedche, A. and Staab, S. (2000), “Discovering conceptual relations from text,” in Horn, W. (ed.), Proceedings of 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nodine, M.H. and Unruh, A. (1997), “Facilitating open communicating in agent systems: the InfoSleuth infrastructure,” Technical Report MCC-INSL-056–97, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Industry Classification System code, DAML Ontology Library, Stanford University, July (2001), http://opencyc.sourceforge.net/daml/naics.daml.

  • Ontolingua web site. Stanford University, Knowledge Systems Laboratory (2001), http://www.kslsvc.stanford.edu:5915/&service=frameeditor.

  • Ontoprise: Semantics for the WEB (2003), http://www.ontoprise.de/products/index_html_en.

  • Park, J.Y., Gennari, J.H., and Musen, M.A. (1997), “Mappings for reuse in knowledge-based systems,” SMI Technical Report 970–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T., Paolucchi, M., Singh, R., and Sycara, K. (2002), “Communicating agents in open multi-agent systems,” Proceedings of First GSFC/JPL Workshop on Radical Agent Concepts (WRAC), pp. 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, A., Chaudhri, V., Lehmann, F., and Farquhar, A. (2000), “Practical knowledge representation and the DARPA high performance knowledge bases project,” in Cohn, A., Giunchiglia, F., and Selman, B. (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR-2000, pp. 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protégé-2000 Project web site. USA, Stanford Medical Informatics at the Stanford University School of Medicine (2000), http://www.protege.stanford.edu/index.shtml.

  • Rathmell, R.A. (1999), “A coalition force scenario “Binni — gateway to the golden bowl of Africa,” in Tate, A. (ed.), Proceedings on International Workshop on Knowledge-Based Planning for Coalition Forces, pp. 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmus, D.W. (2000), “Knowledge management: more than AI but less without it,” PC AI, vol. 14, no. 2, ( Knowledge Technology Inc., Phoenix, AZ ), pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, T.W. and Lesser, V.R. (1995), “Issues in automated negotiation and electronic commerce: extending the contract net framework,” in Huhns, M. and Singh, M. (eds.), Readings in Agents, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, T. (1999), “Distributed rational decision making,” in Weiss, G. (ed.), Multiagent Systems: a Modern Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, pp. 201–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., and Levashova, T. (2002), “Distributed knowledge entry based on intelligent agents and virtual reality technologies,” Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing; 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning; 2002 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICONIP ‘02-SEAL’ 02- FSKD ’ 02), vol. 2, pp. 437–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., Levashova, T., and Haritatos, F. (2003a), “Knowledge source network configuration approach to knowledge logistics,” International Journal of General Systems. Taylor & Francis Group, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 251–269.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., and Levashova, T. (2003b), “KSNet-approach to knowledge fusion from distributed sources,” Computing and Informatics, vol. 22, pp. 105–142.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., and Levashova, T. (2003c), “Agent-based support of mass customization for corporate knowledge management,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 16, is. 4, pp. 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., Levashova, T., and Krizhanovsky, A. (2003d), “Ontology-driven knowledge logistics approach as constraint satisfaction problem,” Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2888, pp. 535–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1980), “The contract net protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, no 29(12), pp. 1104–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecuci, G., Boicu, M., Marcu, D., et al. (2002), “Development and deployment of a disciple agent for center of gravity analysis,” Proceedings of Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Fourteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 853–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trellis project web site (2002), http://www.isi.edu/expect/projects/trellis/index.html.

  • The UNSPSC Code (Universal Standard Products and Services Classification Code), DAML Ontology Library, Stanford University, January (2001), http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/projects/DAML/UNSPSC.daml.

  • Vail, E.F. (1999), “Knowledge mapping: getting started with knowledge management,” Information Systems Management, Fall, pp. 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, P.R.S., Jones, D.M., Beer, M.D., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Diaz, B.M., and Shave, M.J.R. (1999), “Resolving ontological heterogeneity in the KRAFT project,” Proceeding of the International Conference On Database and Expert System Applications, (DEXA-99), Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1677, pp. 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., Levashova, T. (2005). Agents-Based Knowledge Logistics. In: Design of Intelligent Multi-Agent Systems. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44516-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44516-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06177-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44516-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics