Skip to main content

Tight Bounds for Visibility Matching of f-Equal Width Objects

  • Conference paper
Discrete and Computational Geometry (JCDCG 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2866))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Let s denote a compact convex object in ℝ2. The f-width of s is the perpendicular distance between two distinct parallel lines of support of s with direction f. A set of disjoint convex compact objects in ℝ2 is of equal f-width if there exists a direction f such that every pair of objects have equal f-width. A visibility matching, for a set of equal f-width objects is a matching using non-crossing lines of site in the visibility graph of the set. In this note we establish tight bounds on the size of a maximal visibility matching for a set of f-equal width objects by showing that \(\left\lfloor\frac{2n}{3}\right\rfloor \leq h(n) \leq \frac{2n}{3}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bose, P., Toussaint, G.: Growing a tree from its branches. Journal of Algorithms 19, 86–103 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffmann, M., T’oth, C.S.: Segment endpoint visibility graphs are Hamiltonian. In: Proc. 13th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG 2001), Waterloo( ON), Canada, pp. 109–112 (2001); To appear in Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hosono, K.: On an estimate of the size of the maximum matching for a disjoint family of compact convex sets in the plane. Discrete Appl. Math. 113, 291–298 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hosono, K., Matsuda, K.: On the perfect matching of disjoint convex sets by line segments. Discrete Appl. Math. 118, 223–238 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosono, K., Meijer, H., Rappaport, D.: On the visibility graph of convex translates. Discrete Appl. Math. 113, 195–210 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirzaian, A.: Hamiltonian triangulations and circumscribing polygons of disjoint line segments. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl. 2(1), 15–30 (1992)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Rappaport, D.: The visibility graph of congruent discs is Hamiltonian, to appear in Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications (August 8, 2002) (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rappaport, D.: Computing simple circuits from a set of line segments is NP-complete. SIAM J. Comput. 18(6), 1128–1139 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rappaport, D. (2003). Tight Bounds for Visibility Matching of f-Equal Width Objects. In: Akiyama, J., Kano, M. (eds) Discrete and Computational Geometry. JCDCG 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44400-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44400-8_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20776-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44400-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics