Skip to main content

Adapted Pittsburgh-Style Classifier-System: Case-Study

  • Conference paper
Learning Classifier Systems (IWLCS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2661))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study why we should have a closer look to Pittsburgh-style Classifier-Systems (Pitt-CS). This kind of classifier-systems were introduced by Smith during the early 80’s and was nearly forgotten during 20 years. We revisit those kind of classifiers adapting them. We choose as background of our study the ‘El Farol’ bar problem introduced by Arthur. This multi-agents system problem leads us to test several abilities as memory, problem response and uniformity of population, using GA-independent parameters. Results have shown that adapted Pitt-CS have useful abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, W.B.: Inductive reasoning and Bounded Rationality. American Economic Review P.P., 406–411 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernadó, E., Llorà, X., Garrell, J.M.: XCS and GALE: a Comparative Study of Two Learning Classifier Systems with Six Other Learning Algorithms on Classification Tasks. In: The Workshop Proceedings of GECCO 2001, Fourth International Workshop on Learning Classifier Systems (IWLCS 2001), San Francisco, pp. 337–341 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Jong, K.A., Spears, W.M.: Learning Concept Classification Rules Using Genetic Algorithms. In: The Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1991), Sydney, Australia, pp. 651–656 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Enée, G., Escazut, C.: Classifier Systems: Evolving Multi- Agent System with Distributed Elitism. In: The Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation 1999, pp. 1740–1746 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enée, G., Escazut, C.: A Minimal Model of Communication for Multi-Agent Systems. In: Proccedings of ETFA 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enée, G., Escazut, C.: A Minimal Model of Communication for a Multi-Agent Classifier System. In: Fourth International Workshop on Learning Classifier Systems (IWLCS 2001). 2001 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Workshop Program (GECCO 2001) Proceedings, pp. 351–356 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holland, J.H.: Properties of the bucket brigade algorithm. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and their Applications, pp. 1–7. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England (1992) (reprint)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kovacs, T., Kerber, M.: What Makes a Problem Hard for XCS? In: Lanzi, P.L., Stolzmann, W., Wilson, S.W. (eds.) IWLCS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1996, p. 80. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, S.: A learning system based on genetic algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, S.F.: Adaptive Learning Systems. In: Forsyth, R. (ed.) Expert Systems: Principles and Case Studies. Associated Book Publishers Ltd. (October 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stolzmann, W.: Anticipatory Classifier Systems. In: Koza, J.R., Banzhaf, W., Chellapilla, K., Deb, K., Dorigo, M., Fogel, D.B., Garzon, M.H., Goldberg, D.E., Iba, H., Riolo, R. (eds.) Genetic Programming 1998: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, July 22-25, pp. 658–664. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Watkins, C.J.C.H.: Learning from Delayed Rewards. Ph.D. thesis, King’s College, Cambridge University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, S.W.: Classifier fitness based on accuracy. Evolutionary Computation 3(2), 149–175 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Enée, G., Barbaroux, P. (2003). Adapted Pittsburgh-Style Classifier-System: Case-Study. In: Lanzi, P.L., Stolzmann, W., Wilson, S.W. (eds) Learning Classifier Systems. IWLCS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40029-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40029-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20544-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40029-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics