Advertisement

Is Seeing Touching? Mixed Reality Interaction and Involvement Modalities

  • Alok Nandi
  • Xavier Marichal
Conference paper
  • 717 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2897)

Abstract

The present paper elaborates on applications of a mixed-reality system, named Transfiction, designed for leisure and entertainment. It aims at identifying and characterising properties of the system in terms of design, development and usage. More specifically, this paper examines the assertion that the ‘simple’ blurring between touching and seeing allows users to be involved in the narration and helps them to interact with the system. After positioning this approach with respect to other approaches in Mixed-Reality, impacts in terms of technology and design are dealt with. This assertion is supported by empirical experiments commented in the perspective of enriching the potentialities of virtual storytelling.

Keywords

Virtual Object Virtual Reality System Mixed Reality Necker Cube Involvement Modality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nandi, A., Marichal, X.: Transfiction. In: Eskelinen, M., Koskimaa, M. (eds.) CyberText Yearbook 2000, ch. 2, pp. 13–33. Publications of the Research Centre for Contemporary Culture 68 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marichal, X., Umeda, T.: Real-Time Segmentation of Video Objects for Mixed-Reality Interactive Applications. In: Proceedings of the SPIE’s Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP 2003) International Conference, Lugano, Switzerland (July 2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Douxchamps, D., Marichal, X., Umeda, T., Correa Hernandez, P., Marquès, F.: Automatic Body Analysis for Mixed Reality Applications. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (WIAMIS 2003), London, April 2003, pp. 423–426 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krueger, M.: Artificial Reality II. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roussos, M., Johnson, A., Leigh, J., Vasilakis, C., Barnes, C., Moher, T.: NICE: Combining Constructionism, Narrative, and Collaboration in a Virtual Learning Environment. Computer Graphics 31(3), 62–63 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maes, P., Darrell, T., Blumberg, B., Pentland, A.: The ALIVE system: Wireless, fullbody interaction with autonomous agents. Multimedia Systems 5(2), 105–112 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, N., Woo, W., Tadenuma, M.: Photo-realisatic Interactive Virtual Environment Generation using Multiviews Cameras. In: Proceedings of SPIE’s Visual Communication and Image Processing conference 2001 (VCIP 2001), January 2001, vol. 4310 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drascic, D., Milgram, P.: Perceptual Issues in Augmented Reality. In: Bolas, M.T., Fisher, S.S., Merritt, J.O. (eds.) Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III, SPIE, San Jose, California, USA, SPIE, vol. 2653, January - February 1996, pp. 123–134 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dove, T.: The Space Between: Telepresence, Re-animation and the Re-casting of the Invisible. In: Rieser, M., Zapp, A. (eds.) New Screen Media: Cinema, Art, Narrative, British Film Institute, London (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen, J., Mark, R.L. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergson, H.: Matter and Memory. In: Paul, N.M., Palmer, W.S. (trads) Zone Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alok Nandi
    • 1
  • Xavier Marichal
    • 1
  1. 1.AlterfaceLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations