Advertisement

Keeping Watch: Intelligent Virtual Agents Reflecting Human-Like Perception in Cooperative Information Systems

  • Pilar Herrero
  • Angélica de Antonio
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2888)

Abstract

A matter pending in Intelligent Virtual Agents Systems (IVAS) and multi-Intelligent Virtual Agents Systems (mIVAS) is to introduce human-like sensitive perception. Within the cognitive research area there are many studies underwritting that human perception can be understood as a first level of an “awareness model” [6,7].Following these researches, we have developed a human-like perceptual model based on one of the most successful awareness models in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), called the Spatial Model of Interaction (SMI) [1], which manage awareness in Collaborative Virtual Environments (CVEs) through a set of key concepts. This perceptual model extends the key concepts of the SMI introducing some human-like factors typical from human being perception as well as it makes a reinterpretation with the aim of introducing them as the key concepts of a IVA’s human-like perceptual model.

Keywords

Multiagent System Virtual Agent Sensitive Perception Perceptual Model Computer Support Cooperative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benford, S.D., Fahlén, L.E.: A spatial Model of Interaction in Large Virtual Environments. In: Proc. Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 1993), Milano, Italy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blumberg, B.: Go with the Flow: Synthetic Vision for Autonomous Animated Creatures. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 1997), Marina del Rey, CA (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stevephen, C.: Sensing for Autonomous Agents in Virtual Environments (1996), http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~schenney/autonomous/sensing.html
  4. 4.
    Chopra-Khullar, S., Badler, N.: Where to look? Automating attending behaviors of virtual human characters. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 4(1/2), 9–23 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dourish, P., Bellotti, V.: Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on CSCW. Toronto/Canada (October 1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endsley, M.: Towards a theory of situation awareness. Technical report, Texas Technical University, Department of Industrial Engineering (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Endsley, M.: Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of Human Factors Society and Annual Meeting, vol. 1 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geib, C.W., Levison, L., Moore, M.B.: SodaJack: an architecture for agents that search for and manipulate objects. Tech. Rep. MS-CIS-94-16/LINC LAB 265, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenhalgh, C.: Large Scale Collaborative Virtual Environments. Doctoral Thesis. University of Nottingham (October 1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrero, P.: Awareness of interaction and of other participants. Technical Report. Amusement Esprit Project 25197 (February 1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrero, P., De Antonio, A., Segovia, J.: Is the Awareness of Avatars in a Virtual World Different from Human Awareness? In: Workshop on the Future of Cves: Voltage in the Milky Night: The Future of CVE’s The Third International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments. ACM Collaborative Virtual Environments 2000. San Francisco (California) USA (September 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herrero, P., De Antonio, A.: A Human Based Perception Model for Cooperative Intelligent Virtual Agents. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., et al. (eds.) CoopIS 2002, DOA 2002, and ODBASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrero, P., De Antonio, A., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C.: Increasing the Coherence between Human Beings and Virtual Agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy (July 2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herrero, P., De Antonio, A., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C.: A Hearing Perceptual Model for Intelligent Virtual Agents. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Melbourne, Australia (July 2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hill, R., Han, C., van Lent, M.: Applying Perceptually Driven Cognitive Mapping To Virtual Urban Environments. In: Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI 2002), Edmonton, Canada (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hill, R., Han, C., van Lent, M.: Perceptually Driven Cognitive Mapping of Urban Environments. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy (July 2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howarth, P.A., Costello, P.J.: Contemporary Ergonomics 1997, Robertson, S.A. (ed.), pp. 109–116. Taylor and Francis, London (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levi, D.M., Hariharan, S., Klein, S.A.: Suppressive and Facilitatory Spatial Interactions in Peripheral Vision: Peripheral Crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision 2, 167–177 (2002), http://www.journalofvision.org/2/2/3/ Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levi, D.M., Klein, S.A., Hariharan, S.: Suppressive and Facilitatory Spatial Interactions in Foveal Vision: Foveal Crowding is simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision 2, 140–166 (2002), http://journalofvision.org/2/2/2/ Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Logan, B., Fraser, M., Fielding, D., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Herrero, P.: Keeping in Touch: Agents Reporting from Collaborative Virtual Environments. Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Entertainment: Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report SS-02-01. AAAI Press (March 2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nilsson, N.: Teleo-Reactive Programs and the Triple-Tower Architecture. Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence 5, Section B, 99–110 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noser, H.: A Behavioral Animation System Based on L-systems and Synthetic Sensors for Actors. PhD Thesis. École Polytechnique Fédérale De Lausanne (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nugent, W.R.: Virtual Reality: Advanced Imaging Special Effects Let You Roam in Cyberspace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (September 1991)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shively, R.J., Brickner, M., Silbiger, J.: A Computational Model of Situational Awareness Instantiated in MIDAS (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Terzopoulos, D., Rabie, T.F.: Animat Vision: Active Vision in Artificial Animals. Published in Videre: Journal of Computer Vision Research 1(1), 2–19 (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thalmann, D.: The Foundations to Build a Virtual Human Society. In: de Antonio, A., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D. (eds.) IVA 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2190, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pilar Herrero
    • 1
  • Angélica de Antonio
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultad de InformáticaUniversidad Politécnica de MadridBoadilla del Monte. MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations