Skip to main content

Referring to Landmark or Street Information in Route Directions: What Difference Does It Make?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science (COSIT 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2825))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When describing routes in urban environments, speakers usually refer to both street names and visual landmarks. However, a navigational system can be designed which only refers to streets or, alternatively, only to landmarks. Does it make any difference which type of information users are provided with? The answer to this question is crucial for the design of navigational aids. We report two experiments. The first one showed that in a wayfinding task, route directions referring to streets were less effective than those referring to landmarks for guidance purposes. The second experiment showed that when people generate route directions, they tend to produce less street than landmark information. These studies provide a further illustration of the critical role of landmarks in route directions.

This research was supported by a doctoral research grant from the Délégation Générale pour l’Armement (DGA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G.L.: Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14, 333–359 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bahrick, H.P.: The cognitive map of a city: Fifty years of learning and memory. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, pp. 125–163. Academic Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, A.B., Greene, T.C., Fischer, J.D., Baum, A.: Environmental psychology. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, G., Burke, D.M.: Memory for proper names: A review. Memory 1, 249– 263 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cornell, E.H., Heth, C.D., Kneubuhler, Y., Sehgal, S.: Serial position effects in children’s route reversal errors: Implications for police search operations. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10, 301–326 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornell, E.H., Heth, C.D., Skoczylas, M.J.: The nature and use of route expectancies following incidental learning. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 209–229 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel, M.-P., Tom, A., Manghi, E., Denis, M.: Testing the value of route directions through navigational performance. In: Spatial Cognition and Computation (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denis, M.: The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Current Psychology of Cognition 16, 409–458 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., Bertolo, L.: Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13, 145–174 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fontaine, S., Denis, M.: The production of route instructions in underground and urban environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 83–94. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Galea, L.A.M., Kimura, D.: Sex differences in route learning. Personality and Individual Differences 14, 53–65 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Golledge, R.G.: Geographical perspectives on spatial cognition. In: Gärling, T., Golledge, R.G. (eds.) Behavior and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches, pp. 16–46. North Holland, Amsterdam (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Heth, C.D., Cornell, E.H., Alberts, D.M.: Differential use of landmarks by 8- and 12-year-old children during route reversal navigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17, 199–213 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ioerger, T.R.: The manipulation of images to handle indeterminacy in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Science 18, 551–593 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Izaute, M.: De la dénomination: la spécificité des noms propres. L’Année Psychologique 99, 731–751 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kalakoski, V., Saariluoma, P.: Taxi drivers’ exceptional memory of streets names. Memory and Cognition 29, 634–638 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kirasic, K.C., Mathes, E.A.: Effects of different means for conveying environmental information on elderly adults’ spatial cognition and behavior. Environment and Behavior 22, 591–607 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mani, K., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory & Cognition 10, 181–187 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michon, P.-E., Denis, M.: When and why referring to visual landmarks in direction giving? In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nothegger, C.: Automatic selection of landmarks. Unpublished master’s thesis (Diplomarbeit), Vienna Technical University, Vienna, Austria (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Raubal, M., Winter, S.: Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Rossano, M.J., Reardon, W.P.: Goal specificity and the acquisition of survey knowledge. Environment and Behavior 31, 395–412 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider, L.F., Taylor, H.A.: How do you get there from here? Mental representations of route descriptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13, 415–441 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Streeter, L.A., Vitello, D., Wonsiewicz, S.A.: How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigational aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 22, 549–562 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, H.A., Naylor, S.J., Chechile, N.A.: Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Memory and Cognition 27, 309–319 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor, H.A., Tversky, B.: Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 261–292 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thorndyke, P.W., Hayes-Roth, B.: Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology 14, 560–589 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tom, A., Denis, M. (2003). Referring to Landmark or Street Information in Route Directions: What Difference Does It Make?. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science. COSIT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2825. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20148-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39923-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics