Advertisement

A Geometry for Places: Representing Extension and Extended Objects

  • Hedda R. Schmidtke
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2825)

Abstract

The article presents a qualitative region-based approach to the representation of extension. A geometry of incidence and ordering is taken as a basis to characterize the concept of extension founded on the congruence of certain regions (called places) which have equal extension into all directions. The notion of extension of regions is derived from the sizes of places—not from the distance between points as in classical geometry—and represented by size intervals. A geometric specification of granular or scale-specific spatial contexts and of the local extension of a region is then derived. Extension relative to a spatial context is used to formally specify conditions under which object regions can be classified e.g. as punctual, linear, or planar in the context.

Keywords

Representation of extension extended objects spatial granularity spatial context qualitative spatial reasoning incomplete spatial knowledge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bennett, B.: Application of supervaluation semantics to vaguely defined spatial concepts. In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 108–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett, B.: A categorical axiomatisation of region-based geometry. Fundamenta Informaticae 46, 145–158 (2001)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgo, S., Guarino, N., Masolo, C.: A pointless theory of space based on strong connection and congruence. In: Aiello, L.C., Doyle, J., Shapiro, S. (eds.) KR 1996: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 220–229. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carnap, R.: Philosophical Foundations of Physics. Basic Books, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casati, R., Varzi, A.C.: Parts and Places: the Structure of Spatial Representations. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohn, A.G., Hazarika, S.M.: Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning: An overview. Fundamenta Informaticae 46(1-2), 1–29 (2001)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eschenbach, C., Habel, C., Kulik, L., Leßmöllmann, A.: Shape nouns and shape concepts: A geometry for ‘corner’. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1404, pp. 177–201. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank, A.: Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 3, 343–371 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galton, A.: Space, time and movement. In: Stock, O. (ed.) Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, pp. 321–352. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodchild, M.: A geographer looks at spatial information theory. In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goyal, R., Egenhofer, M.: Consistent queries over cardinal directions across different levels of detail. In: Tjoa, U., Wagner, R., Al-Zobaidie, A. (eds.) 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 876–880 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herskovits, A.: Language, spatial cognition, and vision. In: Stock, O. (ed.) Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, pp. 155–202. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hilbert, D.: Grundlagen der Geometrie. Teubner, Stuttgart (1956)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulik, L., Klippel, A.: Reasoning about cardinal directions using grids as qualitative geographic coordinates. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 205–220. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ligozat, G.: Reasoning about cardinal directions. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 9, 23–44 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidtke, H.R.: The house is north of the river: Relative localization of extended objects. In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 414–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suppes, P., Zinnes, J.: Basic measurement theory. In: Luce, R., Bush, R., Galanter, E. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1963)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hedda R. Schmidtke
    • 1
  1. 1.Department for InformaticsUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations