Skip to main content

A New Method for the Global Solution of Large Systems of Continuous Constraints

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2861))

Abstract

Scheduling of refineries is a hard hybrid problem. Application of the Constraint Envelope Scheduling (CES) approach required development of the Gradient Constraint Equation Subdivision (GCES) algorithm, a novel global feasibility solver for the large system of quadratic constraints that arise as subproblems. We describe the implemented solver and its integration into the scheduling system. We include discussion of pragmatic design tradeoffs critically important to achieving reasonable performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boddy, M., Carciofini, J., Hadden, G.: Scheduling with Partial Orders and a Causal Model. In: Proceedings of the Space Applications and Research Workshop, Johnson Space Flight Center (August 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boddy, M., Goldman, R.: Empirical Results on Scheduling and Dynamic Backtracking. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Automation for Space, Pacadena, CA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boddy, M., White, J., Goldman, R., Short, N.: Integrated Planning and Scheduling for Earth Science Data Processing. In: Hostetter, C.F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1995 Goddard Conference on Space Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Information Technologies, pp. 91–101. NASA Conference Publication 3296 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boddy, M., Krebsbach, K.: Hybrid Reasoning for Complex Systems. In: Fall Symposium on Model-directed Autonomous Systems (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cucker, F., Smale, S.: Complexity Estimates Depending on Condition Number and Round-off Error. Jour. of the Assoc. of Computing Machinery 46, 113–184 (1999)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman, R., Boddy, M.: Constraint-Based Scheduling for Batch Manufacturing. IEEE Expert (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heipcke, S.: Combined Modeling and Problem Solving in Mathematical Pro- gramming and Constraint Programming, PhD Thesis, School of Business, University of Buckingham (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hooker, J.: Logic-Based Methods for Optimization: Combining Optimization and Constraint Satisfaction. Wiley, John & Sons, Chichester (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansson, C.: Rigorous Error Bounds for the Optimal Value of Linear Programming Problems. In: Bliek, C., Jermann, C., Neumaier, A. (eds.) COCOS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2861, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kearfott, R.: Rigorous Global Search: Continuous Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, S., Grossmann, I.: New Algorithms for Nonlinear Generalized Disjunctive Programming. Computers and Chem. Engng. 24(9-10), 2125–2141 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore, R.: Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis, by Moore, R.E., Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, B., Brailsford, S., Hubbard, P., Williams, H.: The Progressive Party Problem: Integer Linear Programming and Constraint Programming Compared. In: Working Notes of the Joint Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Operations Research, Timberline, OR (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Hentenryck, P., McAllister, D., Kapur, D.: Solving Polynomial Sys- tems Using a Branch and Prune Approach. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 34(2) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boddy, M.S., Johnson, D.P. (2003). A New Method for the Global Solution of Large Systems of Continuous Constraints. In: Bliek, C., Jermann, C., Neumaier, A. (eds) Global Optimization and Constraint Satisfaction. COCOS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2861. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39901-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39901-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20463-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39901-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics