Skip to main content

A Logical Study on Qualitative Default Reasoning with Probabilities

  • Conference paper
Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2850))

Abstract.

Only very special subclasses of probability distributions can be used for qualitative reasoning that meets basic logical demands. Snow’s atomic bound systems (big-stepped probabilities) provide one positive example for such a subclass. This paper presents a thorough investigation of the formal logical relationships between qualitative and probabilistic default reasoning. We start with formalizing qualitative conditional logic, as well as both standard and big-stepped probabilistic logic as abstract logical systems, using the notion of institutions. The institution of big-stepped probabilities turns out to be a proper combination of the other two. Moreover, the framework of institutions offers the possibility to elaborate exactly the properties that make probability distributions suitable for qualitative reasoning.

The research reported here was partially supported by the DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the CONDOW-project under grant BE 1700/5-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, E.W.: The Logic of Conditionals. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, conditional objects and possibility theory. Artificial Intelligence 92, 259–276 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibilistic and standard probabilistic semantics of conditional knowledge bases. Journal of Logic and Computation 9(6), 873–895 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Beierle, C., Kern-Isberner, G.: Using institutions for the study of qualitative and quantitative conditional logics. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Leone, N., Ianni, G. (eds.) JELIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2424, p. 161. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. de Finetti, B.: La prévision, ses lois logiques et ses sources subjectives. In: Poincaré, H. (ed.) Ann. Inst., vol. 7 (1937); Kyburg, H., Smokler, H.E. (eds.) English translation in Studies in Subjective Probability, pp. 93–158. Wiley, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Non-standard theories of uncertainty in plausible reasoning. In: Brewka, G. (ed.) Principles of Knowledge Representation. CSLI Publications (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goguen, J., Burstall, R.: Institutions: Abstract model theory for specification and programming. Journal of the ACM 39(1), 95–146 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Goguen, J.A., Rosu, G.: Institution morphisms. Formal Aspects of Computing 13(3-5), 274–307 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrlich, H., Strecker, G.E.: Category theory. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kern-Isberner, G.: Conditionals in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Belief Revision. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2087. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44, 167–207 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Makinson, D.: General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Gabbay, D.M., Hogger, C.H., Robinson, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 3, pp. 35–110. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Makinson, D., Gärdenfors, P.: Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic. In: Proceedings Workshop The Logic of Theory Change, Konstanz, Germany, 1989, pp. 185–205. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nute, D., Cross, C.B.: Conditional logic. In: Gabbay, D.M., Guenther, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn., vol. 4, pp. 1–98. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic semantics for nonmonotonic reasoning: A survey. In: Shafer, G., Pearl, J. (eds.) Readings in uncertain reasoning, pp. 699–710. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snow, P.: The emergence of ordered belief from initial ignorance. In: Proceedings AAAI 1994, Seattle, WA, pp. 281–286 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spohn, W.: Ordinal conditional functions: a dynamic theory of epistemic states. In: Harper, W.L., Skyrms, B. (eds.) Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics, II, pp. 105–134. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beierle, C., Kern-Isberner, G. (2003). A Logical Study on Qualitative Default Reasoning with Probabilities. In: Vardi, M.Y., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2850. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39813-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39813-4_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20101-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39813-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics