Skip to main content

Non-rigid Registration of Mammograms Obtained with Variable Breast Compression: A Phantom Study

  • Conference paper
Biomedical Image Registration (WBIR 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2717))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The amount of breast compression applied during a mammographic exam affects the appearance of mammograms by introducing variations in the shape, position, and contrast of breast anatomical structures, which can conceal existing breast abnormalities or generate false alarms. Due to the complex tissue organization and elastic properties of the breast and the projective nature of mammography, rigid registration approaches are not useful in correcting these variations. We describe a non-rigid approach focused on registration of mammogram regions of interest, taking into account the changes in image contrast. This registration algorithm has been applied to synthetic mammograms generated using a deformable 3D anthropomorphic phantom and a model of breast deformation during mammographic compression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Maintz, J., Viergever, M.A.: A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 2(1), 1–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grenander, U., Miller, M.I.: Computational Anatomy: an emerging discipline. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 56(4), 617–694 (1998)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Toga, A.: Brain mapping. Academic Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard, F., Cohen, L.: A new image registration technique with free boundary constraints: application to mammography. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P., et al. (eds.) ECCV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2353, pp. 531–545. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Richard, F., Cohen, L.: Non-rigid image registration with free boundary constraints: application to mammography. Journal of Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Special issue on Nonrigid registration 89(2-3), 166–196 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Richard, F., Graffigne, C.: An image-matching model for the registration of temporal or bilateral mammogram pairs. In: Yaffe, M. (ed.) Proc. of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto, Canada, June 2000. pp. 756–762, Medical Physics (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sallam, M.Y., Bowyer, K.: Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images. Medical Image Analysis 3(2), 103–118 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Semmlow, J.L., Shadagopappan, A., Ackerman, L.V., et al.: A fully automated system for screening Xeromammograms. Computers and Biomedical Research 13, 350–362 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Highnam, R.P., Brady, J.M.: Mammographic image analysis. Kluwer series in Medical Imaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Novak, R.: Transformation of the female breast during compression at mammography with special reference to importance for localization of a lesion. PhD thesis, Departement of Diagnostic Radiology at Lakarhuset and Karolinska Sjukhuset, Sweden (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bakic, P., Brzakovic, D., Brzakovic, P., et al.: An approach to using a generalized breast model to segment digital mammograms. In: Proc. of 11th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Lubbock, pp. 84–89 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bakic, P., Albert, M., Brzakovic, D., Maidment, A.: Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. i. breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. Medical Physics 29(9), 2131–2139 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakic, P., Albert, M., Brzakovic, D., Maidment, A.: Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. ii. evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture. Medical Physics 29(9), 2140–2151 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., et al.: Multi-modality volume registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 16(2), 187–198 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Viola, P., Wells, W.: Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Intern. J. of Comp. Vision 24(2), 137–154 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amit, Y.: A non-linear variational problem for image matching. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 15(1), 207–224 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Bajcsy, R., Kovacic, S.: Multiresolution elastic matching. CVGIP 46, 1–21 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Christensen, G.E., Rabbitt, R.D., Miller, M.I.: Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. In: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, vol. 90, pp. 11944–11948 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bakic, P., Albert, M., Maidment, A.: Classification of galactograms using ramification matrices: preliminary results. Academic Radiology 10(2), 198–204 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hunt, R., Dance, D., Bakic, P., et al.: Monte carlo simulation of x-ray mammography using a realistic voxel phantom. In: Proc. of UK Radiological Congress, Birmingham, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kossoff, G., Fry, E.K., Jellins, J.: Average velocity of ultrasound in the human female breast. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 53, 1730–1736 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ACR Committee on Quality Assurance in Mammography. Mammography Quality Control Manual. Amercan College of radiology, Reston, VA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sullivan, D., Beam, C., Goodman, S., Watt, D.: Measurement of force applied during mammography. Radiology 181, 355–357 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richard, F.J.P., Bakić, P.R., Maidment, A.D.A. (2003). Non-rigid Registration of Mammograms Obtained with Variable Breast Compression: A Phantom Study. In: Gee, J.C., Maintz, J.B.A., Vannier, M.W. (eds) Biomedical Image Registration. WBIR 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2717. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39701-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39701-4_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20343-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39701-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics