Advertisement

Traffic Measurements for Link Dimensioning

  • Remco van de Meent
  • Aiko Pras
  • Michel Mandjes
  • Hans van den Berg
  • Lambert Nieuwenhuis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2867)

Abstract

Traditional traffic measurements meter throughput on time scales in the order of 5 minutes, e.g., using the Multi Router Traffic Grapher (MRTG) tool. The time scale on which users and machines perceive Quality of Service (QoS) is, obviously, orders of magnitudes smaller. One of many possible reasons for degradation of the perceived quality, is congestion on links along the path network packets traverse. In order to prevent quality degradation due to congestion, network links have to be dimensioned in such a way that they appropriately cater for traffic bursts on time scales similarly small to the time scale that determines perceived QoS. It is well-known that variability of link load on small time scales (e.g., 10 milliseconds) is larger than on large time scales (e.g., 5 minutes). Few quantitative figures are known, however, about the magnitude of the differences between fine and coarse-grained measurements. The novel aspect of this paper is that it quantifies the differences in measured link load on small and large time scales. The paper describes two case studies. One of the surprising results is that, even for a network with 2000 users, the difference between short-term and long-term average load can be more than 100%. This leads to the conclusion that, in order to prevent congestion, it may not be sufficient to use the 5 minute MRTG maximum and add a small safety margin.

Keywords

Average Throughput Network Link Small Time Scale Link Load Time Window Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fraleigh, C., Tobagi, F., Diot, C.: Provisioning IP backbone networks to support latency sensitive traffic. In: Proceedings IEEE Infocom 2003, San Francisco CA, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oetiker, T.: MRTG: Multi Router Traffic Grapher, http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/
  3. 3.
    Poortinga, R., van de Meent, R., Pras, A.: Analysing campus traffic using the meter-MIB. In: Proceedings of Passive and Active Measurement Workshop 2002, March 2002, pp. 192–201 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weigle, E., Feng, W.: TICKETing High-Speed Traffic with Commodity Hardware and Software. In: Proceedings of Passive and Active Measurement Workshop 2002, March 2002, pp. 156–166 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han, S., Kim, M., Hong, J.W.: The Architecture of NG-MON: A Passive Network Monitoring System for High-Speed IP Networks. In: Proceeding of 13th IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, October 2002, pp. 16–27 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Endace Measurement Systems, http://www.endace.com
  8. 8.
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Network Research. TCPDump: the Protocol Packet Capture and Dumper Program, http://www.tcpdump.org/
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Boutell.com, Inc. GD Graphics Library, http://www.boutell.com/gd/
  11. 11.
    van de Meent, R.: Homepage, http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~meentr/
  12. 12.
    Cao, J., Cleveland, W., Lin, D., Sun, D.: Internet traffic tends to Poisson and independent as the load increases, Bell Labs Technical Report (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Remco van de Meent
    • 1
  • Aiko Pras
    • 1
  • Michel Mandjes
    • 1
  • Hans van den Berg
    • 1
  • Lambert Nieuwenhuis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations