Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Medical Informatics Challenge in Surgery

  • Chapter
Emerging Technologies in Surgery

  • 740 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen S (2004) Emergency room recovery. Boston Globe, Boston, p A1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (2005) A software factory approach to HL7 version 3 solutions. Microsoft with Blueprint Technologies, Redmond, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anyanwu K et al (2003) Health care enterprise process development and integration. J Res Pract Inf Technol 35:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur WB (1994) On the evolution of complexity, in complexity: metaphors, models, and reality. In: Cowan GA, Pines D, Meltzer D (eds) Proceedings volume XIX, Sante Fe Institute studies in the science of complexity. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balas EA et al (2000) Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med 160:301–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barkmeyer E, Lo J (1989) Experience with IMDAS in the automated manufacturing research facility. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beyea SC, Kilbridge P (2003) Setting a research agenda on patient safety in surgical settings. Semin Laparosc Surg 10:79–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks RA (1991) How to build complete creatures rather than isolated cognitive simulators. In: VanLehn K (ed) Architectures for intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 225–239

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks RA (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artif Intell 47:139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dadam P, Reichert M, Kuhn K (2000) Clinical workflows — the killer application for process-oriented information systems. In: BIS 2000 — proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business Information Systems, Poznan, Poland. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (2004) One Year Countdown to Grand Challenge 2005. DARPA Publishes Rules, Team Application Status Report. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Arlington, Va.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (2003) DARPA, Operating Room of the Future Workshop, Executive Summary. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Arlington, Va., pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dhaliwal JS et al (1997) Using enterprise modeling to reengineer health care processes. SIGGROUP Bull 18:51–53

    Google Scholar 

  14. Exavera Technologies (2004) Exavera, eShepard FAQ (frequently asked questions). Exavera Technologies, Portsmouth, N.H.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gatersleben MR, van der Weij SW (1999) Analysis and simulation of passenger flows in an airport terminal. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Winter Simulation: Simulation—a bridge to the future. ACM, Phoenix

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldratt EM, Cox J (1994) The goal: a process of ongoing improvement, 2nd rev. edn. North River, Great Barrington, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henckels C (2003) Wrong-site surgery: a study of medical misadventure claims. New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation Medical Misadventure Unit, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hinchley A (2003) Understanding version 3: a primer on the HL7 version 3 communication standard. Understanding HL7 Series. Mönch, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  19. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2004) Patient safety: achieving a new standard for care. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larsen RA et al (1989) Improved perioperative antibiotic use and reduced surgical wound infections through use of computer decision analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 10:316–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maamar Z, Sutherland J (2000) Toward intelligent business objects: focusing on techniques to enhance BPs that exhibit goal-oriented behaviors. Comm ACM 40:99–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Manolescu DA, Paul S (2003) An evaluation framework for workflow engines. Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marsland S, Buchan I (2004) Clinical quality needs complex adaptive systems and machine learning. In: Fieschi M (ed) MEDINFO 2004. IOS, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  24. McGlynn EA et al (2003) The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348:2635–2645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Minear MN, Sutherland J (2003) Medical informatics—a catalyst for operating room transformation. Semin Laparosc Surg 10:71–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH (1994) Process dynamics, modeling, and control. Topics in chemical engineering. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Object Management Group and Health Level Seven (2005) Object Management Group begin joint health care soft-ware services standardization work: combined effort leverages strengths of each organization. OMG Press Release 8 March 2005, Needham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paul S, Park E, Chaar J (1998) Essential requirements for a workflow standard. In: Patel D, Sutherland J, Miller J (eds) Business object design and implementation II: OOPSLA’ 96, OOPSLA’ 97, and OOPSLA’ 98 Proceedings. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 100–108

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paul S, Park E, Chaar J (1997) RainMan: a workflow system for the Internet. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sandberg WS, Ganous TJ, Steiner C (2003) Setting a research agenda for perioperative systems design. Semin Laparosc Surg 10:57–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Starfield B (2000) Is US health really the best in the world? JAMA 2000. 284:483–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sutherland J, Alpert S (1999) Big Workflow for enterprise applications. In: Patel D, Sutherland J, Miller J (eds) Business object design and implementation III: OOPSLA’ 99 workshop proceedings. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sutherland J, van den Heuvel WJ (2002) Enterprise application integration and complex adaptive systems: could system integration and cooperation be improved with agentified enterprise components? Comm ACM 45:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sutherland J et al (2005) RECIPE for REal-time proCess ImProvement in health care: putting the health care enterprise on autopilot, in future of health technology. In: Bushko R (ed) Future of Health Technology. Cambridge, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sutherland JV (1989) Architectural vision for manufacturing and 3CI support. Object Databases, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sutherland JV (2004) RECIPE for REal time proCess Im-Provement in health care. In: Proceedings of the Future of Health Technology Summit. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sutherland JV (2004) RECIPE for REal time proCess ImProvement in health care. In: 13th Annual Physician-Computer Connection Symposium. American Society for Medical Directors of Information Systems (AMDIS). Rancho Bernardo, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson TG, Brailer DJ (2004) The decade of health information technology: delivering consumer-centric and information-rich health care — framework for strategic action. US Departmetn of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zimmerman B, Plsek P, Lindberg C (1998) Edgeware: insights from complexity science for health care leader. VHA, Irvine, Tex.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, University of Maryland, 351 West Camden, CY-211, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    J. Sutherland MD & Timothy Ganous MPA

Authors
  1. J. Sutherland MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy Ganous MPA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St Rm BB487, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Richard M. Satava MD (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

  2. Department of General Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy

    Achille Gaspari MD  & Nicola Di Lorenzo MD  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sutherland, J., Ganous, T. (2007). The Medical Informatics Challenge in Surgery. In: Satava, R.M., Gaspari, A., Di Lorenzo, N. (eds) Emerging Technologies in Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39600-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39600-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-39599-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39600-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation