Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ideal VR systems: Is There a “Holy Grail” in Simulation System Land?

  • Chapter
Emerging Technologies in Surgery

  • 745 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalbakke L, Adamsen A, Kruse A (2000) Performance of a colonoscopy simulator: experience from a hands-on endoscopy course. Endoscopy 32:898–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamsen S et al (2005) A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy. Surg Endosc 19:229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2005) Organising a surgical skills centre. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:275–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aggarwal R et al (2006) A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. Am J Surg 191:128–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahlberg G, Heikkinen T, Iselius L (2002) Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? Surg Endosc 16:126–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andreatta PB et al (2006) Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 243:854–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayodeji ID, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2006) Determination of face validity for the Simbionix LAP mentor virtual reality training module. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:28–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergamaschi R (2000) [Farewell to see one, do one, teach one?]. TidsskrNor Laegeforen 121:2798

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blake RL, Hosokawa MC, Riley SL (2000) Student performances on step 1 and step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing. Examination following implementation of a problem-based learning curriculum. Acad Med 75:66–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bridges M, Diamond DL (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Broe D et al (2004) Construct validation of a novel hybrid surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 20:1432–2218

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carter FJ et al (2003) Validation of a virtual reality colonoscopy simulator using subjects of differing experience (proceedings), in 1st European Endoscopic Surgical Week and 11th EAES Congress. Glasgow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carter FJ, Schijven M, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19:1523–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH et al (2001) Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg 234:475–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cosman PH, Cregan PC, Martin CJ, Cartmill JA (2002) Virtual reality simulators: current status in acquisition and assessment of surgical skills. ANZ J Surg 72:30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuschieri A, Francis SN, Crosby J, Hanna GB (2001) What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? Am J Surg 182:110–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Custers EJFM, Regehr G, McCulloch W, Peniston C, Reznick R (1999) The effects of modeling on learning a simple surgical procedure: see one, do one or see many, do one? Adv Health Sci Educ 4:123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dankelman J, Wentink M, Stassen HG (2003) Human reliability and training in minimally invasive surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 12:129–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dankelman J, Chmarra MK, Vedaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Grimbergen CA (2005) Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills. A review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:247–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dankelman J, Di Lorenzo N (2005) Surgical training and simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:211–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Datta VK et al (2002) The PreOp flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer. Validation and early evaluation of a virtual reality based system. Surg Endosc 16:1459–1463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dawson SL (2002) A critical approach to medical simulation. Bull Am Coll Surg 87:12–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Maria EJ, McBride CL, Broderick TJ, Kaplan BJ (2005) Night call does not impair learning of laparoscopic skills. Surg Innov 12:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deshmukh P, Carter FJ, Jayasekera BAS (2006) Face validation of a virtual reality gastroscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 20: S59)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Di Lorenzo N, Gaspari AL (2003) Virtual patient: a new option for surgical education. Business briefing publication — Global Health Care, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  27. Duffy AJ et al (2003) Construct validity for the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 17(Suppl 1):S230

    Google Scholar 

  28. Enochson L et al (2004) Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg 8:874–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP (2004) Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 18:1514–1518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Eriksen JR, Grantcharov TP (2005) Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc 19:1216–1219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fanelli RD et al (2003) Initial experience using an endoscopic simulator to train residents in flexible endoscopy in a community medical center-based residency program. Flexible diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy (proceedings, P233), in SAGES meeting, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fellinger EF (2006) et al Complex laparoscopic task performance on two new computer-based skills training devices. Surg Endosc 20:S336

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ferlitsch A et al (2002) Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 34:698–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 13:1077–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gallagher HJ, Allan JD, Tolley DA (2001) Spatial awareness in urologists: are they different? BJU Int 88:666–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gallagher AG et al (2001) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg 25:1478–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16:1746–1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gallagher AG, Lederman AB, McGlade K, Satava RM, Smith CD (2004) Discriminative validity of the minimally invasive surgical trainer in virtual reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc 18:660–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H (2205) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Garuda S et al (2002) Efficacy of a computer-assisted endoscopic simulator in training residents in flexible endoscopy [poster], in ACG 2002 (proceedings). Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goodell KH, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2006) Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:94–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Krummel TM (1999) Simulation and virtual reality in surgical education: real or unreal? Arch Surg 134:1203–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Krummel TM (2000) Computer-assisted training and learning in surgery. Comp Aid Surg 5:120–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Rawn C, Krummel TM (2000) The future of medical education is no longer blood and guts, it is bits and bytes. Am J Surg 180:353–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Grantcharov TP, Rosemberg J, Pahle E (2001) Virtual reality computer simulation: an objective method for evaluation of laparoscopic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 15:242–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Grantcharov TP et al (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performing on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Grantcharov TP et al (2204) Randomized clinical trail of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hackethal A, Immenroth M, Burger T (2006) Evaluation of target scores and benchmarks for the traversal task scenario of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer — Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 20:645–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Haluck RS, Marshall RL, Krummel TM, Melkonian MG (2001) Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 193:660–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Haluck RS, Krummel TM (2000) Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg 135:786–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Haluck RS (2005) Design consideration for computer-based surgical simulators. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:235–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Halvorsen FH, Elle OJ, Fosse E (2005) Simulators in surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:214–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hance J et al (2004) Evaluation of a laparoscopic video trainer with built in measures of performance, in 13th SLS meeting and EndoExpo. New York

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhondin PH, Lönroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16:1324–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. studies.php

    Google Scholar 

  56. Issenberg SB, McGeghie WC, Hart IR et al (1999) Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282:861–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Jacobs J, Caudell TP, Wilks D et al (2003) Integration of advanced technologies to enhance experiential problem-based learning over distance: Project TOUCH. Anat Rec (New Anat) 270B:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kaufmann CR (2001) Computers in surgical education and the operating room. Ann Chir Gynaecol 90:141–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kaufman DM, Bell W (1997) Teaching and assessing clinical skills using virtual reality. Morgan KS et al (eds.) Medicine Meets Virtual Reality. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 467–472

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kavic MS (2000) Robotics, technology, and the future of surgery. SLS 4:277–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kim CA, Smith CD (1999) Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Surg Endosc 13:723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kneebone RL, Scott W, Darzi A, Horrocks M (2004) Simulation and clinical practice: strengthening the relationship. Med Educ 38:1095–1102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) (eds.) To err is human: building a safer health system. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Korndorffer JR Jr, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ (2006) Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg 2006 191:17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kunst E, Rodel S, Moll F, van den Berg C, Teijink J, van Herwaarden J, van der Palen J, Geelkerken R (2006) Towards a VR trainer for EVAR treatment. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:279–281

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lange T, Indelicato DJ, Rosen JM (2000) Virtual reality in surgical training. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 9:61–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. McClusky DAM, Van Sickle K, Gallagher AG (2004) Relationship between motion analysis, time, accuracy and errors during performance of a laparoscopic suturing task on an augmented reality simulator [proceedings], in 12th EAES Congress, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  68. McDougall EM et al (2006) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. J Am Coll Surg 202:779–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. McNatt SS, Smith SGT (2001) A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 15:1085–1089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Tebbit C, Quiros RM (2005) Participants’ opinions of laparoscopic training devices after a basic laparoscopic training course. Am J Surg 189:758–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Sasso LM (2005) Laparoscopic baseline ability assessment by virtual reality. Journal of Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques 15:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mahmood T, Darzi A (2003) A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator: it is usefully discriminatory for more than one measurable outcome. Surg Endosc 17:1583–1589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Maithel S et al (2006) Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower and CELTS. Surg Endosc 20:104–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, Macrae H, Murnahan J, Hutchinson C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Matern U, Koneczny S, Tedeus M, Dietz K, Buess G (2005) Ergonomic testing of two different types of handles via virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc 19:1147–1150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Moorthy K et al (2004) Validity and reliability of a virtual reality upper gastrointestinal simulator and cross validation using structured assessment of individual performance with video playback. Surg Endosc 28:328–333

    Google Scholar 

  77. Munz Y, Kumar D, Moorthy S et al (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18:485–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Mutter D, Rubino F, Temporal MSG, Marescaux J (2005) Surgical education and Internet-based simulation: The World Virtual University. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:267–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ost D et al (2001) Assessment of a bronchoscopy simulator. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:2248–2255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ota D, Loftin B, Saito T, Lea R, Keller J (1995) Virtual Reality in Surgical Education. Comput Biol Med 25:127–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Patel AD, Gallagher AG, Nicholson WJ, Cates CU (2006) Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1796–1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Rasmussen R (1983) Skills, rules and knowledge; signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 13:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  83. Reich O, Noll M, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Waidelich R, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Baumgartner R, Hofstetter A, Stief CG (2006) High-level virtual reality simulator for endourologic procedures of lower urinary tract. Urology 67:1144–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Ritter EM et al (2005) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 7:871–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ritter EM, Bowyer MW (2005) Simulation for trauma and combat casualty care. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, Oertli D (2006) Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 20:1286–1290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Rovetta L (2000) A computer assisted surgery with 3D robot models and visualisation of the telesurgical action Stud Health Technol Inform 70:292–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Rovetta A, Bejczy AK, Sala R (1997) Telerobotic surgery: applications on human patients and training with virtual reality. Stud Health Technol Inform 39:508–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Rowe R, Cohen R (2000) Virtual reality bronchoscopy simulator [proceedings], in ASA annual meeting, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  90. Rowe R, Cohen RA (2002) An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator. Anesth Analg 95:62–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Sanders AJ, Luursema JM, Warntjes P, Mastboom WJ, Geelkerken RH, Klaase JM, Rodel SG, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, Kommers PA, Verwey WB, Kunst EE (2006) Validation of open-surgery VR trainer. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:473–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Satava RM (2002) Disruptive vision: moral and ethical challenges from advanced technology and issues for the new generation of surgeons. Surg Endosc 16:1403–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Satava RM (1995) Medical applications of virtual reality. J Med Syst 19275–280

    Google Scholar 

  94. Satava RM, Gallagher AG, Pellegrini CA (2003) Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. J Am Coll Surg 196:933–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Satava RM (2005) Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation: an overview. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:257–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators: how to choose. Surgic Endosc 17:1943–1950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2005) Validation of virtual reality simulators: key to the successful integration of a novel teaching technology into minimal access surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:244–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Anderson DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Seymour NE (2005) Integratine simulation into a busy residency program. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:280–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Sloan DA, Donnelly MB, Schwartz RW, Strodel WE (1995) The Objective Structured Clinical Examination: the new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance. Ann Surg 222:735–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, Euhus DM, Jeyarajah DR, Thompson WM, Jones DB (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience. J Am Coll Surg 191:272–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2003) Validation of a computer-based colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 57:214–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2004) Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 99:33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Seymour NE et al (2002) Virtual reality improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blind study. Ann Surg 236:458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Seymour NE (2005) Integrating simulation into a busy residency program. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:280–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Sickle KR van et al (2005) Construct validation of the ProMis simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19:1227–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Stefanidis D, Haluck R, Pham T, Dunne JB, Reinke T, Markley S, Korndorffer JR Jr, Arellano P, Jones DB, Scott DJ (2006) Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center. Surg Endosc doi:10.1007/s00464-006-9112-9

    Google Scholar 

  108. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Black FW, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, Rice DA, Markert RJ, Kastl PR, Scott DJ (2006) Psychomotor testing predicts rate of skill acquisition for proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training. Surgery 140:252–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Touchard C, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2005) Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 138:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Taffinder NJ et al (1998) An objective assessment of surgeons’ psychomotor skills: validation of the MIST-VR laparoscopic simulator. Br J Surg 85(Suppl 1):75

    Google Scholar 

  111. Takiguchi S, Sekimoto M, Yasui M, Miyata H, Fujiwara Y, Yasuda T, Yano M, Monden M (2005) Cyber visual training as a new method for the mastery of endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1204–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Thomas-Gibson S, Vance ME, Saunders BP (2003) Can a colonoscopy computer simulator differentiate between a novice and expert? [Abstract]. Gut 52(Suppl 1):A73

    Google Scholar 

  113. Torkington J, Smith SG, Rees B, Darzi A (2001) The role of the basic surgical skills course in the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc 15:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Uchal M, Tjugum J, Martinsen E, Qiu X, Bergamaschi R (2005) The impact of sleep deprivation on product quality and procedure effectiveness in a laparoscopic physical simulator: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 189:753–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, Lederman A, Baghai M, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2006) Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study. Surg Endosc 21:5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Varley RJ, Goodall JE, Bingener J (2006) Can proficiency benchmarks be established using the endoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 20:S342

    Google Scholar 

  117. Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Monteny LJ, Dankelman J (2006) Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO. Surg Endosc 20:511–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Yousfi MM et al (2002) Flexible sigmoidoscopy: assessing endoscopic skills using a computer-based simulator [proceedings], in ACG meeting, 2002. Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  119. Waseda M, Inaki N, Mailander L, Buess GF (2005) An innovative trainer for surgical procedures using animal organs. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:262–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Wentink M, Stassen LPS, Alwayn I, Hosman RJAW, Stassen HG (2003) Rasmussen’s model of human behaviour in laparoscopy training. Surgic Endosc 17:1241–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy

    Nicola Di Lorenzo MD

Authors
  1. Nicola Di Lorenzo MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St Rm BB487, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Richard M. Satava MD (Professor of Surgery) (Professor of Surgery)

  2. Department of General Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy

    Achille Gaspari MD  & Nicola Di Lorenzo MD  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Di Lorenzo, N. (2007). Ideal VR systems: Is There a “Holy Grail” in Simulation System Land?. In: Satava, R.M., Gaspari, A., Di Lorenzo, N. (eds) Emerging Technologies in Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39600-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39600-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-39599-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39600-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation