Skip to main content

Signal Averaging Limitations in Heterodyne- and Direct-Detection Laser Remote Sensing Measurements

  • Chapter
Optical and Laser Remote Sensing

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Optical Sciences ((SSOS,volume 39))

Abstract

The use of laser remote sensing to determine the concentration of molecular species in the atmosphere by differential-absorption LIDAR (DIAL) requires the measurement of the average transmission of laser signals through the atmosphere at two or more different wavelengths. The accuracy with which the average transmission value, and hence the molecular concentration, may be determined is limited in many cases by the presence of large atmosphere-induced pulse-to-pulse fluctuations in the LIDAR returns.

The Lincoln Laboratory portion of this work was supported by the National Aeronautical and Space Administration and the Air Force Engineering and Services Center.

The University of Maryland portion of this work was supported by the Department of Energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. Menyuk and D. K. Killinger, “Temporal Correlation Measurements of Pulsed Dual CO2 LIDAR Returns,” Opt. Lett. 6; 301 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. Pincus, M. E. Fossey, J. F. Holmes and J. R. Kerr, “Speckle Propagation Through Turbulencer: Experimental,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 760 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. M. Hardesty, R. J. Keeler, M. J. Post and R. A. Richter, “Characteristics of Coherent LIDAR Returns from Calibration Targets and Aerosols,” Appl. Opt. 20, 3763 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Menyuk, D. K. Killinger and W. E. DeFeo, “Laser Remote Sensing of Hydrazine, MMH, and UDMH Using a Differential-Absorption CO2 LIDAR,” Appl. Opt. 21, 2275 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. M. Hardesty, “A Comparison of Heterodyne and Direct Detection CO2 DIAL Systems for Ground-Based Humidity Profiling,” NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL WPL-64, (October 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Brockman, R. V. Hess, L. D. Staton and C. H. Bair, “DIAL with Heterodyne Detection Including Speckle Noise: Aircraft/Shuttle Measurements of O3, H2O, and NH3 with Pulsed Tunable CO2 Lasers,” NASA Tech. Paper 1725, (August 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Menyuk, D. K. Killinger and C. R. Menyuk, “Limitations of Signal Averaging Due to Temporal Correlation in Laser Remote Sensing Measurements,” Appl. Opt. (to be published, September 15, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. K. Killinger, N. Menyuk and W. E. DeFeo, (to be published).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. G. Kjelaas, P. E. Nordal and A. Bjerkestrand, “Scintillation and Multiwavelength Coherence Effects in a Long-Path Laser Absorption Spectrometer,” Appl. Opt. 17, 277 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. Shapiro, B. A. Capron and R. C. Harney, “Imaging and Target Detection with a Heterodyne-Reception Optical Radar,” Appl. Opt. 20, 3292 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. When the measurement accuracy limitation due to the fluctuations of the signal returns is significantly greater than the limitations due to the detection capability of the system, as is the case in the measurements presented here, the signal-to-noise ratio is defined as the mean value of the LIDAR return signals divided by the standard deviation of those signals. This is equivalent to the inverse of the normalized standard deviation values used throughout this paper. The ratio of the mean value of the signal to the mean value of the noise (defined as the carrier-to-noise ratio in Ref. 10) is an equally important factor in establishing system capabilities. In general, for a given energy level, this ratio for a heterodyne-detection system can be expected to be 3 to 4 orders of magnitude greater than for a direct-detection system.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Menyuk, N., Killinger, D.K., Menyuk, C.R. (1983). Signal Averaging Limitations in Heterodyne- and Direct-Detection Laser Remote Sensing Measurements. In: Killinger, D.K., Mooradian, A. (eds) Optical and Laser Remote Sensing. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 39. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39552-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39552-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-15736-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39552-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics