Advertisement

Measurements of Atmospheric Trace Gases by Long Path Differential UV/Visible Absorption Spectroscopy

  • U. Platt
  • D. Perner
Part of the Springer Series in Optical Sciences book series (SSOS, volume 39)

Abstract

Absorption spectroscopic measurement methods for trace gas analysis have a number of clear advantages over sampling methods, including absence of wall losses, greater specificity and the potential for real time measurements of several different species with a single type of instrument. Nonetheless, only a relatively small number of spectroscopic measurements of atmospheric trace gases have been reported in the past, using infrared or UV/visible absorption spectroscopy (Hanst 1971, Tuazon et al. 1981, Connell et al. 1980, Noxon et al. 1980, 1981, Bonafé et al. 1976, Millán et al. 1978).

Keywords

Light Path Exit Slit Wall Loss Light Path Length HONO Absorption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonafé, G. Cesari, G. Giovanelli, T. Tirabassi and O. Vittori, Atmos. Environ., 10, 469–474 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Connell, P. S., R. A. Perry and C. J. Howard, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 1093–1096 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hanst, P. L., Adv. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2, 91 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. Harris, G. W., W. P. L. Carter, A. M. Winer, J. N. Pitts, Jr., U. Platt and D. Perner, Env. Sci. Technol., in press (1982).Google Scholar
  5. Harris, G. W., A. M. Winer and J. N. Pitts, Jr., Presented at Workshop on Optical and Laser Remote Sensing, Monterey, CA, February 9–11, 1982 (following paper).Google Scholar
  6. Haugen, D. A. (editor), Workshop on micrometeorology, Science Press, Ephrata, PA (1973).Google Scholar
  7. Millân, M. M. and R. M. Hoff, Atmos. Environ., 12, 853–864 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Noxon, J. F., R. B. Norton and W. R. Henderson, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 125–128 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Noxon, J. F., Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 1223–1226 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Perner, D. and U. Platt, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6 917–920 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Perner, D. and U. Platt, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7 1053–1056 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Platt, U., D. Perner and H. W. Paetz, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 6329–6335 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Platt, U., D. Perner, A. M. Winer, G. W. Harris and J. N. Pitts, Jr., Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 89–92 (1980a).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Platt, U., D. Perner, A. M. Winer, G. W. Harris and J. N. Pitts, Jr., Nature, 285, 312–314 (1980b).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Platt, U. and D. Perner, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 7453- (1980c).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Platt, U., D. Perner, J. Schroeder, C. Kessler and A. Toennissen, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11965–11970 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tuazon, E. C, A. M. Winer and J. N. Pitts, Jr., Environ. Sci. Technol., 15, 1232–1237 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Platt
    • 1
  • D. Perner
    • 1
  1. 1.Kernforschungsanlage Jülich, Atmosphärische ChemieInstitut für Chemie 3JülichFed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations