Skip to main content

Planning in Answer Set Programming Using Ordered Task Decomposition

  • Conference paper
Book cover KI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2821))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a formalism for solving Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) Planning using Answer Set Programming (ASP). We consider the formulation of HTN planning as described in the SHOP planning system and define a systematic translation method from SHOP’s representation of the planning problem into logic programs with negation. We show that our translation is sound and complete: answer sets of the logic program obtained by our translation correspond exactly to the solutions of the planning problem. We compare our method to (1) similar approaches based on non-HTN planning and (2) SHOP, a dedicated planning system. We show that our approach outperforms non-HTN methods and that its performance is better with ASP systems that allow for nonground programs than with ASP systems that require ground programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Niemelä, I., Simons, P.: Efficient Implementation of the Well-founded and Stable Model Semantics. In: Maher, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the Joint International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, Bonn, Germany, pp. 289–303. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dimopoulos, Y., Nebel, B., Koehler, J.: Encoding Planning Problems in Nonmonotonic Logic Programs. In: Steel, S. (ed.) ECP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1348, pp. 169–181. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dix, J., Furbach, U., Niemelä, I.: Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Towards Efficient Calculi and Implementations. In: Voronkov, A., Robinson, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 1121–1234. Elsevier-Science-Press, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eiter, T., Leone, N., Mateis, C., Pfeifer, G., Scarcello, F.: The KR System dlv: Progress Report, Comparisons and Benchmarks. In: Cohn, A.G., Schubert, L., Shapiro, S.C. (eds.) Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1998), pp. 406–417. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, W., Warren, D.S.: Tabled Evaluation with Delaying for General Logic Programs. Journal of the ACM 43, 20–74 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao, P., Sagonas, K., Swift, T., Warren, D.S., Freire, J.: XSB: A System for Efficiently Computing Well-Founded Semantics. In: Fuhrbach, U., Dix, J., Nerode, A. (eds.) LPNMR 1997. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 1265, pp. 430–440. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Apt, K.R., Marek, V., Truszczynski, M., Warren, D.S. (eds.): The Logic Programming Paradigm: Current Trends and Future Directions. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sacerdoti, E.: A Structure for Plans and Behavior. American Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Erol, K., Hendler, J., Nau, D.: UMCP: A Sound and Complete Procedure for Hierarchical Task-Network Planning. In: Hammond, K. (ed.) Proceedings of AIPS 1994, Chicago, IL, pp. 249–254. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkins, D.: Practical Planning – Extending the Classical AI Planning Paradigm. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nau, D., Cao, Y., Lotem, A., Mun̈oz-Avila, H.: SHOP: Simple Hierarchical Ordered Planner. In: Dean, T. (ed.) Proceedings of IJCAI 1999. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nau, D., Cao, Y., Lotem, A., Muñoz-Avila, H., Mitchell, S.: Total-Order Planning with Partially Ordered Subtasks. In: Nebel, B. (ed.) Proceedings of IJCAI 2001, Seattle, Washington, pp. 425–430. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Action Languages. Electronic Transactions on AI 2, 193–210 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Turner, H.: Representing Actions in Logic Programs and Default Theories: A Situation Calculus Approach. The Journal of Logic Programming 31, 245–298 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lifschitz, V.: Action Languages, Answer Sets and Planning. In: Apt, K.R., Marek, V.W., Truszczynski, M., Warren, D.S. (eds.) The Logic Programming Paradigm: A 25-Year Perspective, pp. 357–373. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCain, N., Turner, H.: Causal Theories of Action and Change. In: Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1997), Menlo Park, CA, pp. 460–465. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCain, N.: Using Causal Calculator with the C Input Language. Technical report, University of Texas at Austin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eiter, T., Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G., Polleres, A.: The DLV-K Planning System: Progress Report. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Leone, N., Ianni, G. (eds.) JELIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2424, pp. 541–544. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Baral, C., Tran, N., Tuan, L.: Reasoning about Actions in a Probabilistic Setting. In: AAAI/IAAI 2002, pp. 507–512. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Son, T., Baral, C., McIlraith., S.: Planning with domain-dependent knowledge of different kinds – an answer set programming approach. In: Eiter, T., Faber, W., Truszczyński, M. (eds.) LPNMR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2173, pp. 226–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nau, D., Au, T.C., Ilghami, O., Kuter, U., Murdock, W., Wu, D., Yaman, F.: SHOP2: an HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (2003) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dix, J., Kuter, U., Nau, D.: HTN Planning in Answer Set Programming. Technical Report CS TR 4336, University of Maryland (2002) (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bacchus, F.: AIPS 2000 Planning Competition. AI Magazine 22, 47–56 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kvarnström, J., Doherty, P.: TALplanner: A Temporal Logic Based Forward Chaining Planner. Annals of Mathematics and Articial Intelligence 30, 119–169 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dix, J., Kuter, U., Nau, D. (2003). Planning in Answer Set Programming Using Ordered Task Decomposition. In: Günter, A., Kruse, R., Neumann, B. (eds) KI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2821. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39451-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39451-8_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20059-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39451-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics