Advertisement

New Phenomena in Coherent Optical Transients

  • R. G. Brewer
  • R. G. Devoe
  • S. C. Rand
  • A. Schenzle
  • N. C. Wong
  • S. S. Kano
  • A. Wokaun
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Optical Sciences book series (SSOS, volume 30)

Abstract

It is often stated, and with justification, that the concepts underlying coherent optical transient phenomena can be found in the literature of spin transients. For example, the Bloch vector [1] description of spin echoes [2] and free precession [3] applies equally well to photon echoes [4] and optical free induction decay [5]. While this conclusion remains largely true, it is not equally valid to say that the techniques are the same or to prophesy that the applications of optical and rf transients are identical also. In fact, the decay channels of optically excited atoms, molecules and solids usually involve a variety of interactions which contrast with the magnetic interactions encountered in spin resonance. This is a major distinction, one which has permitted new studies at optical frequencies. Moreover, it is also true that some of the practioners of magnetic resonance are beginning to learn a few lessons from quantum optics as well. In this paper, we have selected some of the new developments which are representative of the field of coherent optical transients.

Keywords

Free Induction Decay Spin Echo Superposition State Bloch Vector Photon Echo 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Bloch, Phys. Rev. 70, 460 (1946).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. L. Hahn, Phys. Rev 80, 580 (1950).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. L. Hahn, Phys. Rev. 77, 297 (1950).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. A. Kurnit, I. D. Abella and S. R. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 567 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. G. Brewer and R. L. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. A 6, 2001 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Variations on a theme of H. J. Lipkin in The Mossbauer Effect, edited by H. Frauenfelder ( W. A. Benjamin Inc., New York, 1962 ), p. 13.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Schenzle, N. C. Wong and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. A 21, 887 (1980).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    See the theorem A. Schenzle, N. C. Wong and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. 22, 635 (1980).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. G. DeVoe and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. A. 20, 2449 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Kunitomo, T. Endo, S. Nakanishi and T. Hashi, Phys. Lett. 80A, 84 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Mossberg, A. Flusberg, R. Kachru and S. R. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1665 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.B. Morsink, 0.A. Wiersma, In Laser Spectroscopy IV, ed. by H. Walther, K.W. Rothe, Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Vol. 21 ( Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1979 ) p. 404Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. A. Kash and E. L. Hahn (to be published).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. G. Brewer and R. L. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 631 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Schmidt, P. R. Berman and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1103 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. P. R. Berman, J. M. Levy and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. A 11, 1668 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    B. Comaskey, R. E. Scotti and R. L. Shoemaker, Optics Letters 6, 45 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    R. G. Brewer and A. Z. Genack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 959 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    R. G. Brewer and S. S. Kano in Nonlinear Behavior of Molecules and Ions in Electric, Magnetic or Electromagnetic Fields ( Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979 ), p. 45.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    M. Woodwortd and I. D. Abella, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1567 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    T. W. Mossberg, R. Kachru and S. R. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 73 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    R. G. DeVoe, A. Szabo, S. C. Rand and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1560 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    S. d. Rand, A. Wokaun, R. G. DeVoe and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1868 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    R. G. DeVoe, A. Wokaun, S. C. Rand and R. G. Brewer, Phys. Rev. B 23, 3125 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 24.
    J. R. Klauder and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 125, 912 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    R. M. Shelby and R. M. Macfarlane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1098 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 26.
    D. A. Wiersma, Advances in Chemical Physics (to be published in 1981 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Brewer
    • 1
  • R. G. Devoe
    • 1
  • S. C. Rand
    • 1
  • A. Schenzle
    • 1
  • N. C. Wong
    • 1
  • S. S. Kano
    • 1
  • A. Wokaun
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Research LaboratorySan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations