Skip to main content

Decision Support Systems in Healthcare: Emerging Trends and Success Factors

  • Chapter
Applied Decision Support with Soft Computing

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 124))

Abstract

Emerging over 50 years ago, decision support systems have a long history in the healthcare setting. Health decision support systems incorporate a variety of soft computing techniques to derive useful information from data repositories, human knowledge, and on-line literature to support decision making across operational and clinical processes in healthcare organizations. This article summarizes the historical and state of the art decision support systems in healthcare, analyzes the success factors needed for widespread deployment, and postulates the future trends of the field in the context of a new decision management paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, I., M. Chan, et al. (1986). Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. British Medical Journal 293 (6550): 800–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adlassnig, K. P. and G. Kolarz (1985). Present state of the medical expert system CADIAG-2. Medical Information 24: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G. O., J. J. Cimino, et al. (1987). DXplain: An evolving diagnostic decision-support system. Journal of the American Medical Association 258: 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov, G. and J. Warren (2001). Fuzzy logic for decision support in chronic care. Artifcial Intelligence in Medicine 21 (2001): 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. E. and L. A. Zadeh (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science 17 (1970): 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berner, E. S., Ed. (1999). Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice.,Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote, R. A., D. J. Rothwell, et al., Eds. (1993). The Systematized Nomenclature of medicine: SNOMED International. Northeld, IL, College of American Pathologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Dombal, F., S. E. Clamp, et al. (1997). Measuring surgical performance in acute abdominal pain: some reflections from international studies. European Journal of Surgery 163 (5): 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlman, S. E. (1979). NETL: A System for Representing and Using Real-World Knowledge. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., L. J. Soer, et al. (1985). QUICK (quick index to Caduceus knowledge): Using the Internist-1/Caduceus knowledge base as an electronic textbook of medicine. Computers and Biomedical Research 18: 137–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, C. P., A. S. Elstein, et al. (1999). Enhancement of clinicians’ diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems. Journal of the American Medical Association 282 (19): 1851–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y. Y. and R. E. Steuer, Eds. (2000). Research and practice in multiple criteria decision making: proceedings of the XIVth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), 1998,Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, P. J., R. M. Gardner, et al. (1999). Hospital-based decision support. Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice. E. S. Berner, Springer-Verlag: 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hripcsak, G., P. Ludemann, et al. (1994). Rationale for the Arden syntax. Computers and Biomedical Research 27: 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, D. L. and M. E. Cohen (1994). Fuzzy logic in medical expert system. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine: 693–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, B. L., Ed. (1990). UMLS Knowledge Sources - First Experimental Edition Documentation. Bethesda, MA, National Library of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. (2001a). Evaluating informatics applications–clinical decision support systems literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 64: 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. (2001b). Evaluating informatics applications–some alternative approaches: Theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. International Journal of Medical Informatics 64: 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, L. T., J. M. Corrigan, et al. (2000). To err is human; building a safer health system, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarz, G. and K. P. Adlassnig (1986). Problems in establishing the medical expert systems CADIAG-1 and CADIAG-2 in rheumatology. Journal of Medical Systems 10 (4): 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowski, C. A. and S. M. Weiss. (1982). Representation of expert knowledge for consultation: The casnet and expert projects. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. P. Szolovits. Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press,. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperman, G. J., R. M. Gardner, et al. (1991). HELP: A Dynamic Hospital Information System.,Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledley, R. S. and L. B. Lusted (1959). Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. Science 130: 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitich, H., H. Kiener, et al. (2001). A prospective evaluation of the medical consultation system CADIAG-II/RHEUMA in a rheumatological outpatient clinic. Methods of Information in Medicine 40 (3): 213–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, T. Y. (1998). Multiple perspective dynamic decision making. Artifcial Intelligence 105 (1–2): 209–261.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtig., L. K. (1986). Hospital Information Systems and Case Mix Management.,John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, M. J. (1999). Medical education applications. Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice. E. S. Berner, Springer-Verlag: 105–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisboa, P. J. G. (2002). A review of evidence of health benefit from articial neural networks in medical intervention. Neural Networks 15 (2002): 11–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusted, L. B. (1960). Computer programming of diagnostic tests. IRE Transactions on Medical Electronics ME-7: 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mango, L. J. (1994). Computer-assisted cervical cancer screening using networks. Cancer Letters 77: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mango, L. J. (1997). Clnical validation of interactive cytologic rescreening: automating the search, not the interpretation. Acta Cytologica 41 (1): 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mango, L. J. and P. T. Valente (1998). Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in persumed negative cervical cytologic smears: A comparison. Acta Cytologica 42 (1): 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, W., B. Brock, et al. (1990). Twelve years’ experience of computer-aided diagnosis in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72 (1): 140–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., F. E. Masarie, et al. (1986). Quick medical reference (QMR) for diagnostic assistance. M.D. Computing. 3: 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. A. (1994). Medical diagnostic decision support systems–past, present, and future: A threaded bibliography and commentary. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1: 8–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. A. (1996.). Evaluating evaluations of medical diagnostic systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 3: 429–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. A. and F. E. Masarie (1989). Use of the Quick Medical Reference (QMR) program as a tool for medical education. Methods of Information in Medicine 28: 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. A., H. E. J. Pople, et al. (1982). Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 307: 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musen, M. A. (1998). Domain ontologie in software engineering: Use of PROTEGE with the EON architecture. Methods of Information in Medicine 37 (45): 540–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musen, M. A., Y. Shahar, et al. (2001). Clinical decision support systems. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. E. H. Shortliffe, L. E. Perreault, G. Widerhold and L. M. Fagan, Springer: 573–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashef, S. A. M., F. Roques, et al. (1999). European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 16 (1999): 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno-Machado, L., J. H. Gennari, et al. (1998). The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines.. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 5(4): 357–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozbolt, J. G. and S. Bakken (2001). Patient care systems. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. E. H. Shortliffe, L. E. Perreault, G. Widerhold and L. M. Fagan, Springer: 421–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsonnet, V., D. Dean, et al. (1989). A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 79 (6 Pt 2): I3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, R. S., P. Szolovits, et al. (1982). Modeling knowledge of the patient in acid-base and electrolyte disorders. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. P. Szolovits. Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press,. 51: 187–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauker, S. G., G. A. Gorry, et al. (1976). Towards the simulation of clinical cognition: Taking a present illness by computer. American Journal of Medicine 60: 981–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, M., A. A. Boxwala, et al. (2001). Sharable representation of clinical guidelines in GLIF: relationship to the Arden Syntax. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 34 (3): 170–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sageder, B., K. Boegl, et al. (1997). The knowledge model of MedFrame/CADIAG-IV. Stud Health Technol Inform 43 Pt B: 629–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortliffe, E. H. (1976). MYCIN: Computer-based Medical Consultations. New York, American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, I., P. Gorman, et al. (2001). Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medcine. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 8 (6): 527–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, I., D. Owens, et al. (2000). Electronic trial banks: a complementary method for reporting randomized trials. Med Decis Making. 20 (4): 440–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szolovits, P. (1982). Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. P. Szolovits. Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press,. 51: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. J. H., Ed. (1998a). Health Decision Support Systems.,Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. J. H. (1998b). An introduciton to health decision support systems: Definition, evolution, and framework. Health Decision Support Systems. J. J. H. Tan, Aspen: 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. J. H., D. Uyeno, et al. (1998). The art of macro-micro view: Strategic planning for health decision and executive support systems. Health Decision Support Systems. J. J. H. Tan, Aspen: 265–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu, H. N., A. Kandel, et al., Eds. (1999a). Fuzzy and Neuro-Fuzzy Systems in Medicine CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu, H. N., A. Kandel, et al. (1999b). Fuzzy Logic and Neuro-Fuzzy Systems in Medicine and Bio-Medical Engineering: A Historical Perspective. Fuzzy and Neuro-Fuzzy Systems in Medicine. H. N. Teodorescu, A. Kandel and L. C. Jain, CRC Press: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1992). International classiffcation of diseases index. Tenth revision. Volume 1: Tabular list. Geneva, The World Health Organization,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1969). Biological applications of the theory of fuzzy sets and systems. Biocybernetics of the Central Nervous System. L. D. Proctor. Boston, MA, Little Brown & Co.: 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, A. L. and T. Y. Leong (2001). Automating dynamic decision model construction to support clinical practice guideline development. Computer-Based Support for Clinical Guidelines and Protocols. B. Heller, M. Loftier, M. Musen and M. Stefanelli, IOS Press: 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leong, TY. (2003). Decision Support Systems in Healthcare: Emerging Trends and Success Factors. In: Yu, X., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Applied Decision Support with Soft Computing. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 124. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37008-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37008-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53534-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37008-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics