This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
18.10 Literatur
Abel U. Die Bewertung diagnostischer Tests. Stuttgart: Hippokrates Verlag, 1993.
Adams N, Hand D. An improved measure for comparing diagnostic tests. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2000; 30: 89–96.
Altman D, Schulz K, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Götzsche D, Lang T for the CONSORT Group. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001; 134: 663–694.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003(1);138:40–44.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Lijmer JG; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003(2);138: W1–W12.
Centor R. Signal detectability: the use of ROC curves and their analyses. Medical Decision Making 1991; 11: 102–116.
DeLong E, DeLong D, Clarke-Pearson D. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves — a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837–845.
Dorfman D, Alf E. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals — rating-method data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1969; 6: 487–496.
Guggenmoos-Holtzmann I, Van Houwelingen H. The (in)validity of sensitivity and specificity. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19: 1783–1792.
Hand D. Construction and assessment of classification rules. New York: Wiley, 1997.
Hanley J, McNeil B. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36.
Hanley J, McNeil B. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–843.
Hanley J. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging 1989; 29: 307–335.
Hilden J. The area under the ROC curve and its competitors. Medical Decision Making 1991; 11: 95–101.
Hilgers R. Distribution-free confidence bounds for ROC curves. Methods of Information in Medicine 1991; 30: 96–101.
Jensen K, Abel U. Methodik diagnostischer Validierungsstudien: Fehler in der Studienplanung und Auswertung. Medizinische Klinik 1999; 54: 522–529.
Jensen K, Müller H, Schäfer H. Regional confidence bands for ROC curves. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19: 493–509.
Knottnerus JA, Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1992; 45:1143–1154.
Krengel U. Einführung in die Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Statistik. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg Verlag, 1991.
Köbberling J, Richter K, Trampisch H-J, Windeler J. Methodologie der medizinischen Diagnostik. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 1991.
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JHP, Bossuyt PMM. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999; 282: 1061–1066.
Lusted L. Signal detectability and medical decision-making. Science 1971; 171: 1217–1219.
Ma G, Hall W. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves. Medical Decision Making 1993; 13: 191–197.
Metz C, Kronman H. Statistical significance tests for binormal ROC curves. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1980; 22: 218–243.
Mijnhout G, Hoekstra O, Mautits W, Gerrit J, Walther L. Systematic review of the diagno stic accuracy of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in melanoma patients. Cancer 2001; 91: 1530–1542.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001; 134: 657–662.
Pepe MS. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press, 2004.
Sackett D, Richardson W, Rosenberg W, Haynes R. Evidenzbasierte Medizin. München: Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 1999.
Sauerbrei W, Madjar H, Prömpeler H. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by logistic regression and a classification tree using Doppler flow signals. Methods of Information in Medicine 1998; 37: 226–234.
Thompson M, Zucchini W. On the statistical analysis of ROC curves. Statistics in Medicine 1989; 8: 1277–1290.
Vach W. The dependence of Cohen’s kappa on the prevalence does not matter. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005; 58:655–661.
Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: Wiley, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wehberg, S., Sauerbrei, W., Schumacher, M. (2007). Diagnosestudien: Wertigkeit der Sonographie bei der Differenzierung von gut- und bösartigen Brusttumoren bei Patientinnen mit klinischen Symptomen. In: Methodik klinischer Studien. Statistik und ihre Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36990-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36990-5_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36989-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36990-5
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)