Science in Support of the Forest Biodiversity Programme for Southern Finland

Working from the inside
  • Eeva Hellström
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Forest Owner Policy Process Forest Protection Qualitative Comparative Analysis Conceptual Utilisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Guldin R.W., Parrotta, J.A., Hellström, E. (2005). Working Effectively at the Interface of Forest Science and Forest Polic. Guidance for Scientists and Research Organizations. IUFRO Task Force on the Forest Science-Policy Interface. IUFRO Occasional Paper 17Google Scholar
  2. Hellström, E. (2001). Conflict Cultures–Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Environmental Conflicts in Forestry. Silva Fennica Monographs 2Google Scholar
  3. Hildén, M., Kuuluvainen, J., Ollikainen, M., Primmer, E. (1999). Kansallisen metsänohjelman ympäristövaikutusten arviointi (Environmental Assessment of the national forestry programme. Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryGoogle Scholar
  4. Jaatinen, M. (1999). Lobbying Political Issues. A Contingency Model of Effective Lobbying Strategies. Inforviestintä Oy, Yliopistopaino, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  5. Kivinen, K., Paldanius, J. (2002). Kansallinen metsäohjelma 2010:n evaluointi. Diskurssi Oy & Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö. 16.9.2002Google Scholar
  6. Lampinen, O. (1985). Yhteiskuntatieteellisen tutkimuksen hyödyntäminen poliittis-hallinnolliessa päätöksenteossa. Suomen Akatemian julkaisuja 6/1985. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis, R., Koch N.E. (1999). Forest Science-Policy Interface. IUFRO Task Force Science-Policy Interface. Papers presented at a Side Event of the Third Session of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF 3), Geneva, Switzerland 3–14 May, 1999. IUFRO Occasional Paper 13, 1–5Google Scholar
  8. Mills, T.J., Solberg, B. (1998). Research Contributions to Forest Policy Formulation: Opportunities and Cautions. International Consultation on Research and Information Systems in Forestry. Proceedings. An Austrian and Indonesian Initiative in Support of the Programme of Work of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests. September 1998, Gmunden, Austria. Edited by the International Union of Forestry Research Organisations (IUFRO) and printed by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Austria, 19–31Google Scholar
  9. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (1999). Finland’s National Forest Programme 2010. Publications 2/1999Google Scholar
  10. Ministry of Environment (2000). Metsien suojelun tarve Etelä-Suomessa ja Pohjanmaalla. Suomen ympäristö 437Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Environment (2002a). Etelä-Suomen, Oulun läänin länsiosan ja Lapin läänin lounaisosan metsien monimuotoisuuden turvaamisen toimintaohjelma. Suomen ympäristö 583Google Scholar
  12. Ministry of Environment (2002b). Finnish Government Commission on Forest Protection Proposes Action Plan. Press Release of the Ministry of the Environment, 2 July 2002Google Scholar
  13. Parviainen, J. et al. (2000). Forest Reserves Research Network in Europe. Mission, Goals, Outputs, Linkages, Recommendations and Partners. Final Report. COST Action E4. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Research Station.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eeva Hellström
    • 1
  1. 1.Finnish Forest AssociationHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations