This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrams, P., Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Gardner, J., Heylings, P. (2003). Evaluating Governance: A Handbook to Accompany a Participatory Process for a Protected Area. Draft, July. Parks Canada and TILCEPA
Badeck, F.W., Fürstenau, C., Lasch, P., Suckow, F., Peltola, H., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Briceño-Elizondo, E., Kellomäki, S., Lexer, M.J., Jäger, D., Lindner, M., Thiel, D., Kaipainen, T., Lehikoinen, N., Junge, S., Feliu, J. (2005). Adaptive forest management at the scale of management units. In: Kellomäki, S., Leinonen, S. (eds). Management of European forests under changing climatic conditions. Research Notes 163. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, 315–382
Biernacki, P., Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball Sampling. Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods and Research 10(2), 141–163
Chess, C. (2000). Evaluating Environmental Public Participation: Methodological Questions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43, 769–784
van Daalen, C. E., Thissen, W. A. H., Berk, M. M. (1996). The Delft process: experiences with a dialogue between policy-makers and global modellers. Global Environmental Change 6, 267–285
Eggers, T. (2002). The impacts of manufacturing and utilisation of wood products on the European carbon budget. Joensuu, European Forest Institute, 90
European Climate Forum (2003). The Biofuels Directive. Potential for climate protection? Conference Summary (Norwich, UK, 8th–10th September, 2003). URL: http://european-climate-forum.net/events/norwich2003/pdf/ecf_conference_summary.pdf
European Climate Forum (2004). What is dangerous climate change? Initial results of a Symposium on Key Vulnerable Regions and Climate Change and Article 2 of the UNFCCC, Buenos Aires, 14 December 2004. URL: http://www.european-climate-forum.net/pdf/ECF_beijing_results.pdf
Fiorino, D.J. (1990). Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: a survey of institutional mechnisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 15, 226–243
Funtowicz, S., J. Ravetz (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25, 739–755
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in comtemporary societies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Hage, M., Leroy, P., Willems, E. (2005). Participatory approaches in governance and in knowledge production: What makes the difference? Paper presented at the International Sociology Association Conference “Environment, knowledge and democracy”, 6–7 July 2005, Marseille, France
Hasselmann, K., Latif, M., Hooss, G., Azar, C., Edenhofer, O., Jaeger, C. C., Johannessen, O. M., Kemfert, C., Welp, M., Wokaun, A. (2003). The Challenge of Long-term Climate Change. Science 302, 1923–1925
Kangas, J., Kangas, A. (2002). Multiple criteria decision support methods in forest management-An overview and comparative analyses. In: Pukkala, T. (ed). Multi-Objective Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 37–70
Kellomäki, S., Väisänen, H., et al. (1993). FinnFor: a model for calculating the response of boreal forest ecosystem to climate change, University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, 1–120
Lasch, P., Badeck, F. W., et al. (2002). Sensitivity of simulated forest growth to changes in climate and atmospheric CO2. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt Supplement 1, 155–171
Lexer, M. J. (2000). Ein multi-attributives Nutzenmodell zur Unterstützung der waldbaulichen Entscheidungsfindung dargestellt am Beispiel sekundärer Nadelwälder. Forstwissenschaftliches Zentralblatt 119, 377–394
Metzger, M. J., Leemans, R., Schröter, D., Cramer, W., the ATEAM consortium (2004). The ATEAM vulnerability mapping tool. Office C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation (PE&RC), Wageningen, The Netherlands. CD-ROM publication No. 27. URL www.pikpotsdam.de/ateam
Morales, P., Sykes, M.T., Prentice, C., Smith, P., Smith, B., Bugmann, H., Zierl, B., Friedlingstein, P., Viovy, N., Sabaté, S., Sánchez, A., Pla, E., Gracia, C.A., Sitch, S., Arneth, A., Ogee, J. (2005). Comparing and evaluating process-based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes. Global Change Biology 11(12), 2211
Morgan, M. G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, Atmanet, C.J. (2002). Risk Communication; A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pohl, C. (2005). Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures 37, 1159–1178
Ravetz, J. (1999). What is Post-Normal Science? Futures 31, 647–653
Rowe, G., Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 25, 3–29
Runge, D., Reusswig, F. (2004). Substitution von Geschäftsreisen durch Videokonferenzen. Zusammenfassung des Endberichts vom Dezember 2003. Potsdam Insitute for Climate Impact Research, Germany. URL: http://www.european-climate-forum.net/pdf/Zusammenfassung%20ECF.pdf
Reusswig, F., Schwarzkopf, J., Pohlenz, P. (2004). The climate blockbuster ‘the day after tomorrow’ and its impact on the german cinema public. PIK Report No. 92. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/pik_web/publications/pik_reports/reports/pr.92/pr92.pdf
Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria Decision Making-The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Schröter D., Cramer, W., Leemans, R., Prentice, I.C., Araújo, M.B., Arnell, N.W., Bondeau, A., Bugmann, H., Carter, T.R., Gracia, C.A., de la Vega-Leinert, A.C., Erhard, M., Ewert, F., Glendining, M., House, J.I., Kankaanpää, S., Klein, R.J.T., Lavorel, S., Lindner, M., Metzger, M.J., Meyer, J., Mitchell, T.D., Reginster, I., Rounsevell, M., Sabaté, S., Sitch, S., Smith, B., Smith, J., Smith, P., Sykes, M.T., Thonicke, K., Thuiller, W., Tuck, G., Zaehle, S., Zierl, B. (2005). Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe. Science 310(5752), 1333–1337
Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T., Jaeger, C.C. (2001). The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environmental Change 11(2), 107–117
Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (2006). Linking Case Studies to the Integrative Theory of Reflexive Dialogues. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
Vega-Leinert, de la, A.C., Schröter, D., Leemans, R., Frisch, U., Pluimers, J. (in review). A stakeholder dialogue on European vulnerability. A contribution to the ATEAM special issue submitted to Regional Environmental Change
Vennix, J.A.M. (1999). Group model-building: tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review 15(4), 379–401
Webler, T. (1995). Models for Environmental Discourse. In: Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 35–86
Welp, M., Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2006). Integrative Theory of Reflexive Dialogues. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
Welp, M., de la Vega-Leinert, A., Stoll-Kleemann, S., Jaeger, C.C. (2006). Science-based stakeholder dialogues: tools and theories. Global Environmental Change 16, 170–181
Welp, M., Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C.C. (in press). Citizens’ Voices in Environmental Policy: The Contribution of Integrated Assessment Focus Groups to Accountable Decision Making. In: Coenen, F.H.J.M., Paterson, R. (Eds). The Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Welp, M., de la Vega-Leinert, A.C., Stoll-Kleemann, S., Fürstenau, C. (2006). Science-based Stakeholder Dialogues in Climate Change Research. In: Stollkleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds) Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36917-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36917-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36916-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36917-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)