Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a More Effective and Democratic Natural Resources Management

  • Chapter
Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agrawal, A., Gibson, C.C. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4), 629–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S.R. (1971). A ladder of participation in the USA. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute April, 176–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Averbeck, C. (2006). Incorporating Local People through Economic Incentives at Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda — Africa works! In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, T., Borrini-Feyerabend, G., de Sherbinin, A., Warren, P. (1997). Our people, our resources. IUCN (The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Batisse, M. (1997). Biosphere reserves: a challenge for biodiversity conservation and regional planning. Environment 39, 7–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierle, T.C. (2000). The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions: Lessons from the Case Study Record. Resources for the Future, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghöfer, A., Berghöfer, U. (2006). ‚Participation ‘in Development Thinking — Coming to Grips with a Truism and its Critiques. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1996). On Dialogue. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996). Collaborative Management of protected areas: tailoring the approach to the context. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, A.G., Gullison, R.E., Rice R.E., da Fonseca, G.A.P. (2001). Effectiveness of Parks in Protecting Tropical Biodiversity. Science 291(5501), 125–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (1999). Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development 11(4), 597–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, D.M. (1999). Stakeholder versus Public Participation. Paper prepared for the 19th annual conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment in Glasgow, Scotland, 13.–19. June, 1999. URL: http://www.islandnet.com/~connor/stakeholder.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Czada, R. (1992). Der Staat als wirtschaftender Akteur. In: Abromeit, H., Jürgens, U. (eds). Die politische Logik wirtschaftlichen Handelns. Edition Sigma, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Priscoli, J. (1997). Participation and Conflict Management in Natural Resources Decision-Making. In: Solberg, B., Miina, S. (eds). Conflict Management and Public Participation in Land Management. EFI Proceedings 14, 61–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Eben, M. (2006). Public Participation during Site-Selections for Natura 2000 in Germany: The Bavarian Case. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1968). The active society. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston, Pitman

    Google Scholar 

  • GEF (Global Environment Facility) (2000). Interim Assessment of Biodiversity Enabling Activities: National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans. Global Environment Facility, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons, Science 168, 1243–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, E. (2006). Science in Support of the Forest Biodiversity Programme for Southern Finland. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmati, M. (2002). Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability-Beyond Deadlock and Conflict. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue. In: Hajer, M.A., Wagenaar, H. (eds). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 33–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, C.C. (2003). A Note on Domains of Discourse — Logical Know-How for Integrated Modelling. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). Working paper No. 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, C. C., Kasemir, B., Stoll-Kleemann, S., Schibli, D., Dahinden, U. (2000). Climate Change and the Voice of the Public. Integrated Assessment 1, 339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., Martello M.L. (2004). Conclusion: Knowledge and Governance. In Jasanoff, S., Martello, M.L. (eds). Earthly Politics. Local and Global in Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A.G., Richardson, J. (1983). Overcrowded policy-making. Some British and European reflections. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2, 56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Gruebler, A., Huntley, B., Jager, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H. III, O’Riordan, T., Svedlin., U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science 292, 641–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P.J. (1984). Corporation and change. Cornell University Press, London, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasemir, B., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C.C., Gardner, M.T. (2003). (eds). Public Participation in Sustainability Science. A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P. (1991). The preconditions for policy networks. Some findings from a three-country study on industrial restructuring. In: Marin, B., Mayntz, R. (eds). Plocy networks. Campus-Verlag: Frankfurt am Main & Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhn, J. (2002). Conflict Management on Consensus-Building for Integrated Coastal Zone Management — Does Stakeholder Involvement Fit in to the Baltic Sea Region? In: Schernewski, G., Schiewer, U. (eds). Baltic Coastal Ecosystems: Structure, Function and Coastal Zone Management, Springer, Berlin, 341–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke, J. (2006). Community Forest Management in Esmeraldas-Is Constructive Dialogue Possible? In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer, F., Zouwen, J.v.D. (eds). Sociocybernetic paradoxes. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarleveld, M., van de Velde, R., van Uum, J., Pleisier, I. (2006). To See or not to See, that is the Question: Geo-information Visualization Tools as a Means to Facilitate Stakeholder Dialogues in Land and Water Management Planning. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (1987). Politische Steuerung und gesellschaftliche Steuerungsprobleme. Anmerkungen zu einem theoretischen Paradigma. In: Ellwein, T., Hesse, J.J. (eds). Jahrbuch zur Staats-und Verwaltungswissenschaft. Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J. A. (1995). Expanding partnerships in conservation. Washington D.C.: Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrian-Webster’s Colleagiate Dictionary (1995). 10th Edition. Springfield, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, D. (1995, 1998). Die Netzwerkgesellschaft: Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit als Probleme gesellschaftlicher Steuerung. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Band 108. Weltforum Verlag, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oels, A. (2003). Evaluating stakeholder participation in the transition to sustainable development: Methodology, case studies and implications for policymaking. LIT-Verlag, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Oels, A. (2006). Evaluating Stakeholder Dialogues. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1987). Die Staatstheorie auf der Suche nach ihrem Gegenstand. Beobachtungen zur aktuellen Diskussion. In: Ellwein, T. et al. (eds). Jahrbuch zur Staats-und Verwaltungswissenschaft. Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1968). Die Logik kollektiven Handelns. Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T., Stoll-Kleemann, S. (eds) (2002). Biodiversity, Sustainability and Human Communities. Protecting Beyond the Protected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. (2006). Epilogue: Spreading the Ripples. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1994). Institutional Analysis, Design Principles and Threats to Sustainable Community Governance and Management of Commons. In: Pomeroy, R.S. (ed). Community Management and common property of coastal fisheries in Asia and the Pacific: concepts, methods, experiences. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 45, 34–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes. Integrated Assessment 3(1), 3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J.N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23(8), 1247–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J.N., Pimbert, M.P. (1995). Beyond conservation ideology and the wilderness myth. Natural Resources Forum 19, 5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2006). Participatory Processes for Natural Resource Management. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Webler, T. Wiedemann, P. (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Kluwer: Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J. 1998. Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3(3), 155–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25(1), 3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1983a). Games in hierarchies and networks. In: Scharpf, F.W. (ed). Games in hierarchies and networks. Campus-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main & Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1983b). Coordination in hierarchies and networks. In: Scharpf, F.W. (ed). Games in hierarchies and networks. Campus-Verlag, Fanrkfurt am Main & Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffran, J. (2006). Tools for Stakeholder Assessment and Interaction. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1998). The Fifth Discipline. The art and practice of the learning organisations. Century Business, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Songorwa, A.N. (1999). Community based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the Communities interested? World Development 27(12), 2061–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2005). Voices for Biodiversity Management in the 21st Century. Environment 47(10), 24–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., Bertzky, M. (2006). Biodiversity Management and Monitoring in Protected Areas — State of the Art and Current Trends. In: Sonak, S. (ed). Multiple Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Teri Press, New Delhi, India, 143–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T. (2002a). From participation to partnership in biodiversity protection: experience from Germany and South Africa. Society and Natural Resources, 15(2), 157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T. (2002b). Enhancing Biodiversity and Humanity. In: O’Riordan, T., Stoll-Kleemann, S. (eds). Biodiversity, Sustainability and Human Communities. Protecting Beyond the Protected. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 295–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (2006). Linking Case Studies to the Integrative Theory of Reflexive Dialogues. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T., Jaeger, C. C. (2001). The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environmental Change 11(2), 107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T., Burns, T. (2003). Linking the citizen to governance for sustainable climate futures. In: Kasemir, B., Gardner, M., Jäger, J., Jaeger, C.C. (eds). Public Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 239–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., Bender, S., Berghöfer, A., Bertzky, M., Fritz-Vietta, N., Schliep, R., Thierfelder, B. (2006). Linking Governance and Management Perspectives with Conservation Success. Perspectives on Biodiversity Governance and Management 1(1), 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, M., Samaniego Rivera, J. (2006). Participation in the Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo, N., Hauselman, P. (2004). Governance and Multistakeholder Processes. International Institute for Sustainable Development. URL: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2004/sci_governance.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Welp, M., Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2006). Integrative Theory of Reflexive Dialogues. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Welp, M., de la Vega-Leinert, A.C., Stoll-Kleemann, S., Jaeger, C.C. (2006a). Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Theories and tools. Global Environmental Change 16(2), 170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welp, M., de la Vega-Leinert, A.C., Stoll-Kleemann, S., Fürstenau, C. (2006b). Science-based stakeholder dialogues in climate change research. In: Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Welp, M., Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C.C. (in press). Citizens’ Voices in Environmental Policy: The Contribution of Integrated Assessment Focus Groups to Accountable Decision Making. In: Coenen, F.H.J.M., Paterson, R. (Eds). The Promise and Limits of Participatory Processes for the Quality of Environmentally Related Decision-making. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (1998). Systematisches Wissensmanagement. Lucius & Lucius UTB, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosie, T.F., Herbst, T.D. (1998). Using Stakeholder Processes in Environmental Decisionmaking. An Evaluation of Lessons Learned, Key Issues, and Future Challenges. URL: http://www.riskworld.com/Nreports/1998/STAKEHOLD/PDF/nr98ab01.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany

    Susanne Stoll-Kleemann

  2. University of Applied Sciences Eberswalde, Germany

    Martin Welp

Authors
  1. Susanne Stoll-Kleemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Welp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Research Group GoBi, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Luisenstr. 53, 10099, Berlin, Germany

    Susanne Stollkleemann

  2. Socioeconomics and Communication, University of Applied Sciences Eberswalde, Faculty of Forestry, Alfred-Moeller-Str. 1, 16225, Eberswalde, Germany

    Martin Welp

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoll-Kleemann, S., Welp, M. (2006). Towards a More Effective and Democratic Natural Resources Management. In: Stollkleemann, S., Welp, M. (eds) Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36917-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation