Advertisement

Foreword

Participatory Processes for Natural Resource Management
  • Ortwin Renn
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Keywords

Natural Resource Management Public Participation Participatory Process Public Involvement Citizen Participation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beierle, T.C., Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in Practice. Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Resources for the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Boholm, A., (1998). Comparative Studies of Risk Perception: A Review of Twenty Years of Research. Journal of Risk Research 1(2), 135–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradbury, J.A. (1989). The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Science, Technology, and Human Values 14(4), 380–399Google Scholar
  4. Chess, C., Dietz, Th., Shannon, M. (1998). Who Should Deliberate When? Human Ecology Review 5(1), 60–68Google Scholar
  5. Coglianese, C. (1997). Assessing Consensus; The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rule Making. Duke Law Journal 46, 1255–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1997). Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In: Bohman, J., Rehg W., (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, 407–437Google Scholar
  7. Creighton, J.L. (1983). The Use of Values: Public Participation in the Planning Process. In: Daneke, G.A., Garcia, M.W., Delli Priscoli, J. (eds.). Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment. Westview Press, Boulder, 143–160Google Scholar
  8. Cross, F.B. (1998). Facts and Values in Risk Assessment. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 59, 27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DEMOS (2004). See-Through Science. Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. Monograph by Wisdon, J., Willis, R., Demos, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. De-Marchi, B., Ravetz, J.R. (1999). Risk Management and Governance: A Post-Normal Science Approach. Futures 31, 743–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietz, T., Stern, P.C., Rycroft, R.W. (1989). Definitions of Conflict and the Legitimization of Resources: The Case of Environmental Risk. Sociological Forum 4, 47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dryzek, J.S. (1994). Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M. (1991). Perception of Risk. Studies of Risk Attitudes, Perceptions, and Definitions. Center for Risk Research, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregory, R.S. (2004). Valuing Risk Management Choices. In: McDaniels, T., Small, M.J. (eds). Risk Analysis and Society. An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 213–250Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1970). ‘Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence. Inquiry 13, 363–372Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (1987a). Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. II: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1987b). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. (1991). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. translated by Lenhardt, C., Weber, S. Nicholson. Second edition. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Horlick-Jones, T. (1998). Meaning and Contextualization in Risk Assessment. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 59, 79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IRGC (2005). White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach. International Risk Governance Council, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaeger, C., Renn, O., Rosa, E., Webler, Th. (2001). Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Jasanoff, S. (1993). Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis 13(2), 123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jasanoff, S. (1998). The Political Science of Risk Perception. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 59, 91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society. In: Jasanoff, S. (ed.). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge, London, 31–54Google Scholar
  25. Kemp, R. (1985). Planning, Political Hearings, and the Politics of Discourse. In: Forester, J. (ed). Critical Theory and Public Life. MIT Press: Cambridge, 177–201Google Scholar
  26. Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. (1996). Science, Values, and Risk. In: Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. (eds). Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Special Issue. Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 116–125Google Scholar
  27. Liberatore, A., Funtowicz, S. (2003). Democratizing Expertise, Expertising Democracy: What Does This Mean, and Why Bother? Science and Public Policy 30(3), 146–150Google Scholar
  28. Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Fitzgerald, K.B. (1996). Conflicting Views on Fair Siting Processes: Evidence from Austria and the U.S. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 7(2), 119–134Google Scholar
  29. MacLean, D. (1986). Social Values and the Distribution of Risk. In: MacLean, D. (ed). Values at Risk. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, 75–93Google Scholar
  30. Margolis, H. (1996). Dealing with Risk. Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarthy, T. (1975). Translator’s Introduction. In: Habermas, J. Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Okrent, D. (1998). Risk Perception and Risk Management: On Knowledge, Resource Allocation and Equity. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 59, 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pidgeon, N.F. (1997). The Limits to Safety? Culture, Politics, Learning and Manmade Disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 5(1), 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raiffa, H. (1994). The Art and Science of Negotiation. 12th edition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Renn, O. (1997). Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges. Journal of Risk Research 1(1), 49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Renn, O. (1999). A Model for an Analytic-Deliberative Process in Risk Management, Environmental Science and Technology 33(18), 3049–3055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Renn, O. (2004). The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management. In: MacDaniels, T. L., Small, M.J. (eds). Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 289–366Google Scholar
  38. Renn, O., Webler, Th. (1998). Der kooperative Diskurs-Theoretische Grundlagen, Anforderungen, Möglichkeiten. In: Renn, O., Kastenholz, H., Schild, P., Wilhelm, U., (eds). Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs. Bürgerbeteiligung bei der Standortsuche für eine Deponie im Kanton Aargau. Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, 3–103Google Scholar
  39. Rosa, E.A. (1998). Metatheoretical Foundations for Post-Normal Risk. Journal of Risk Research 1, 15–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossi, J. (1997). Participation Run Amok: The Costs of Mass Participation for Deliberative Agency Decisionmaking. Northwestern University Law Review 92, 173–249Google Scholar
  41. Schneider, E., Oppermann, B., Renn, O. (1998). Experiences from Germany: Application of a Structured Model of Public Participation in Waste Management Planning. Interact. Journal of Public Participation 4(1), 63–72Google Scholar
  42. Skillington, T. (1997). Politics and the Struggle to Define: A Discourse Analysis of the Framing Strategies of Competing Actors in a ‘New’ Participatory Forum. British Journal of Sociology 48(3), 493–513Google Scholar
  43. Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm. In: Krimsky, S., Golding, D. (eds). Social Theories of Risk. Praeger, Westport and London, 153–178Google Scholar
  44. Stern, P.C., Fineberg, V. (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Research Council. Committee on Risk Characterization. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  45. Tuler, S. (1996). Meanings, Understandings, and Interpersonal Relationships in Environmental Policy Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation. Clark University, WorcesterGoogle Scholar
  46. Tuler, S., Webler, Th. (1999). Designing an Analytic Deliberative Process for Environmental Health Policy Making in the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 10(65), 65–87Google Scholar
  47. Schomberg, von, R. (1995). The Erosion of the Valuespheres. The Ways in which Society Copes with Scientific, Moral and Ethical Uncertainty. In: Schomberg, von, R., (ed). Contested Technology. Ethics, Risk and Public Debate. International Centre for Human and Public Affairs, Tilburg, 13–28Google Scholar
  48. Waldo, J. (1987). Win/Win Does Work. Timber-Fish-Wildlife. A Report from the Northwest Renewable Resources Center 1(1), 7Google Scholar
  49. Warren, M.E. (1993). Can Participatory Democracy Produce Better Selves? Psychological Dimensions of Habermas’ Discursive Model of Democracy. Political Psychology 14, 209–234Google Scholar
  50. Webler, Th. (1995). ‘Right’ Discourse in Citizen Participation. An Evaluative Yardstick. In: Renn, O., Webler, Th., Wiedemann, P. (eds). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston, 35–86Google Scholar
  51. Webler, Th. (1999). The Craft and Theory of Public Participation: A Dialectical Process. Risk Research 2(1), 55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webler, Th., Renn, O. (1995). A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice. In: Renn, O., Webler, Th., Wiedemann, P. (eds). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston, 17–34Google Scholar
  53. Wehrli-Schindler, B. (1987). Demokratische Mitwirkung in der Raumplanung. SVPW, BernGoogle Scholar
  54. Wynne, B. (1989). Sheepfarming after Chernobyl. Environment 31(11–15), 33–37Google Scholar
  55. Wynne, B. (1992). Risk and Social Learning: Reification to Engagement. In: Krimsky, S., Golding, D. (eds). Social Theories of Risk. Praeger, Westport, 275–297Google Scholar
  56. Wynne, B. (2002). Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out? Current Sociology 50(30), 459–477Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ortwin Renn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations