Abstract
Over thousands of years, humans affect landscapes in a way we cannot comprehend, expect, or control. Nowadays, the strong increase on human action since the middle of the last century and the increasing pressures on landscape resources from different parties mostly involve conflicting interests among stakeholders. In recognition to these environmental pressures, the European Commission established laws, directives, and conventions to be obligatory considered in planning. Hence, landscape planning and landscape management need to take place with the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD-Directive 2000/60/EG), the Natura 2000 Framework (FFH-Directive 92/43/EEC and Bird-Directive 79/409/EEC) and the more pragmatic Landscape Convention (Council of Europe 2000) which all have to correspond to various demands in order to be compliant in future.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
Bastian O (1999) Leitbilder für Naturräume auf der Basis von Landschaftsfunktionen. Natur und Landschaft 74: 361–373.
Bastian O (2000) Leitbilder — das Patentrezept für die Landschaftsplanung? Geographie und Schule 22: 12–22.
Bertalanffy (1950) An outline of General Systems Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1:139–164.
Brand J, Tress B, Tress G (2000) Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. In: Conference material for the international conference on “Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management”, Centre for Landscape Research, University of Roskilde, Denmark, October 18–21, 2000, 263 p.
Brandt J, Vejre H (2003) Multifunctional Landscapes, Motives, concepts and perspectives. In: Brandt J, Vejre H (eds) 2003. Multifunctional Landscapes. Vol 1 & 2. Advances in Ecological Sciences. WIT Press London. ISBN: 1-85312-936-4.
Buchecker M, Hunziker M, Kienast F (2003) Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 29–46.
Bunch M (2000) An adaptive ecosystem approach to rehabilitation and management of the Cooum River environmental system in Chennai, India. Dissertation Thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, 404 p.
Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Toronto.
Clayton AMH, Radcliffe N (1996) Sustainability: A Systems Approach. Earthscan, London.
Costanza R (2000) Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conservation Ecology 4: 5. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art5/
Council Directive (2 April 1979) on the conservation of wild birds (79/409/EEC); http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/nature_conservation/eu_nature_legislation/birds_directive/index_en.htm (accessed: 09.08.2005)
Council Directive (21 May 1992) on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (92/43/EEC); http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/nature_conservation/eu_nature_legislation/habitats_directive/index_en.htm (accessed: 09.08.2005)
Council of Europe (2000): European Landscape Convention. European Treaty. ETS No. 176. Florence. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm (accessed: 09.08.2005)
di Castri F (1987) The evolution of terrestrial ecosystems. In: Ravera O (ed) Ecological assessment of environmental degradation, pollution and recovery, p.1–30.
European Parliament and Council of Europe (23 October 2000): Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (Directive 2000/60/EG); http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html (accessed: 09.08.2005)
Fellner A, Kohl M (1994) Leitbilder — Begriffs-Inflation oder Verfahrens-Innovation. ARSU 4: 7–16.
Finck P, Hauke U, Schröder E, Forst R und Woithe G (eds) (1997) Naturschutzfachliche Landschafts-Leitbilder. Rahmenvorstellungen für das Nordwestdeutsche Tiefland ausbundesweiter Sicht. 265 S., Bonn-Bad Godesberg
Fish R, Haines-Young R und Rubiano J (2003) Stakeholder landscapes and GIS: institutional visions of landscape and sustainability in the management of the Sherwood Natural Area, UK. In: Palang H et al. (eds) Landscape Interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes, pp. 147–162.
Gaede M, Potschin M (2001): Anforderungen an den Leitbild-Begriff aus planerischer Sicht. Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde 75: 19–32.
Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (1995) Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York.
Haber W (1971) Landschaftspflege durch differenzierte Bodennutzung. Bayr. Landw. Jb. 48: 19–35.
Haines-Young R (2000) Sustainable Development and Sustainable Landscapes: Defining a New Paradigm for Landscape Ecology. Fennia 178: 7–14.
Holling C (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York.
Jedicke E (1998) Raum-Zeit-Dynamik in Ökosystemen und Landschaften. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 30: 229–236.
Jessel B (1994) Leitbilder — Umweltqualitätsziele — Umweltstandards. In: (ANL), B.A.: Leitbilder — Umweltqualitätsziele — Umweltstandards, 04/1994, S. 5–10. — ISBN 3-924374-99-6.
Jessel B (1995) Ist künftige Landschaft planbar? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von ökologisch orientierter Planung. In: Laufener Seminarbeiträge 4/95, Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege (ANL, Hrsg.): Vision Landschaft 2020 — Von der historischen Kulturlandschaft zur Landschaft von Morgen, 4/95, S. 91–100.
Kaiser J (ed) (1965) Planung, Bd. I–VI, Baden-Baden. 1965–1972.
Kay J (1994) The Ecosystem Approach: Ecosystems as Complex Systems and The Ecosystem Approach Applied to the Huron Natural Area. Prepared for Environment Canada, State of the Environment Reporting, Ottawa, Canada.; http://www.nesh.ca/jameskay/www.fes.uwaterloo.ca/u/jjkay/pubs/nac/index.html
Kay J, Boyle M, Regier H und Francis G (1999) An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures 31: 721–742.
Kingsland S (2002) Designing nature reserves: adapting ecology to real world problems. Endeavour 26: 9–14.
Klages L (1906) Das persönliche Leitbild. In: Graphologische Monatshefte.
Klug H (2000) Landschaftsökologisch begründetes Leitbild für eine funktional vielfältige Landschaft. Das Beispiel Pongau im Salzburger Land. Universität Hannover, 112 S., Diplomarbeit (unpublished), URL: http://www.hermannklug.com, Hannover.
Klug H (2002) Methodisch-konzeptuelle Landschaftsentwicklung über prozessorientierte, funktional-haushaltliche landschaftsökologische Leitbilder. SIR-Mitteilungen und Berichte 30: 43–52.
Klug H (2005) Semi-automatische Landschaftsanalyse mit dem ArcGIS 9.x ModelBuilder. Corp 2005. Tagungsband / Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) in Urban Planning and Spatial Development and Impacts of ICT on Physical Space. ISBN: 3-901673-12-1
Klug H (submitted) No landscape planning without a vision: an extended process-driven Leitbild methodology for the practitioner. Submitted to Journal of Land Use Science.
Klug H, Potschin M (submitted) Introduction to the German speaking Leitbild concept for integrative rural landscape planning.
Klug H, Zeil P (2006) Bridging multi-functionality of agriculture and multifunctional landscapes by applying the Leitbild approach. In: Meyer BC (ed.): Sustainable Land Use in Intensively Used Agricultural Regions. Wageningen, pp. 82–90.
Laszlo E (1972) The Systems View of the World. New York.
Laszlo E (1994) The Choice: Evolution or Extinction. A thinking Person’s Guide to Global issues. New York.
Lee KN (1993) Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington.
Mörtl A (2005) Fotorealistische dreidimensionale Landschaftsvisualsierung auf der Basis von GIS-Daten — dargestellt am Beispiel eines Waldentwicklungsszenarios im Nationalpark Berchtesgaden. In: Strobl J, Blaschke T, Griesebner G (eds) Angewandte Geoinformatik. Beiträge zum 17. AGIT-Symposium Salzburg, S. 467–474.
Mosimann T, Köhler I, Poppe I (2001) Entwicklung prozessual begründeter landschaftsökologischer Leitbilder für funktional vielfältige Landschaften. In: Gebhardt, H. et al. (eds) Berichte zur Deutschen Landeskunde, 75, S. 33–66.
Moss R (2000) Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the “Transformation of Argricultural Landscapes”. Landscape Ecology 15: 303–311.
Naveh Z (2000a) What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 7–26.
Naveh Z (2000b) The Landscape — from vision to Definition. In: Brand J, Tress B, Tress G (eds.) Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. Conference material October 18–21, 2000, University of Roskilde, Denmark, p. 27–43.
Naveh Z (2004) The importance of multifunctional, self-organising biosphere landscapes for the future of our Total Human Ecosystem — a new paradigm for transdisciplinary landscape ecology. In: Brandt J. et al. (eds) Multifunctional Landscapes: Theory, Values and History, 1, pp. 33–62.
Opdam P, Steingröver E, van Rooij S (2006) Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75: 322–332.
Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of Chaos, Man’s Dialogue with Nature. New York.
Schwineköper K, Seifert P, Konold W (1992) Landschaftsökologische Leitbilder. Garten und Landschaft 6: 33–38.
Smuts JC (1926) Holism and Evolution, http://www.isss.org/primer/smuts.htm
Tress B, Tress G (2000) Scenarios for the management of multifunctional landscapes. In: Brandt J, Tress B, Tress G (eds) Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. Conference material October 18–21, 2000, University of Roskilde, Denmark, p. 21.
Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary system approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 143–157.
Tress B, Tress G, Decamps H, d’Hautessere A (2001) Bridging human and natural science in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 137–141.
von Haaren C (2002) Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 73–80.
Vorwald J, Wiegleb G (1998) Beispielhafte Entwicklung von Leitbildern in der Bergbaufolgelandschaft. Aktuelle Reihe 4/98, Brandenburg Technische Universität Cottbus.
Walters C (1986) Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York.
Wiegleb G (1997) Leitbildmethode und naturschutzfachliche Bewertung. Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz 6: 43–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klug, H. (2007). Participative landscape planning using a GIS approach for facilitation. In: Mander, Ü., Wiggering, H., Helming, K. (eds) Multifunctional Land Use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36762-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36763-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)