Skip to main content

Analysis based on components and architecture

  • Chapter
Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control
  • 5021 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter models and analyses the component architecture of a system. It deals with the information that can be deduced from components and the way in which the components are connected. Simple and aggregated components are described in terms of their generic properties. These include the service offered by a component in different modes of operation and the conditions under which component faults occur. Properties of selected simple components are discussed and their aggregation into generic components at a higher level is illustrated. Formal methods for describing generic components are introduced. Algebraic and graph-theoretic methods are employed to analyse the propagation of faults through the faulty system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

4.9 Bibliographical notes

  1. M. Bayart, A. L. Gehin and M. Staroswiecki. Fault detection and isolation and mode management in smart actuators. IFAC SICICA’92, Malaga 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bayart, M. Staroswiecki and A. L. Gehin. Mode management in a distributed intelligent automated production system. IFAC ARRTC, Ostende 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Blanke. Consistent design of dependable control systems. Control Engineering Practice, 4: 1305–1312, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Blanke, O. Borch, F. Bagnoli and G. Allasia. Development of an automated technique for failure modes and effect analysis. Proc. European Safety and Reliability Conf., pp. 839–844, Munich 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. A. Bøgh. Fault Tolerant Control Systems — A Development Method and Real-Life Case Study. PhD thesis, Dept. of Control Eng., Aalborg University, Denmark 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Bouras and M. Staroswiecki. Building distributed architectures by the interconnection of intelligent instruments. IFAC INCOM’98, Nancy 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bouras and M. Staroswiecki. How can intelligent instruments interoperate in an application framework? A mechanism for taking into account operating constraints. IFAC SICICA’97, Annecy 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Cassar, M. Bayart and M. Staroswiecki. Hierarchical data validation in control systems using smart actuators and sensors. IFAC Symposium on Intelligent Components and Instruments for Control Application (SICICA’92), Malaga 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. L. Gehin, M. Bayart and M. Staroswiecki. Faulty resources management in automation systems. IEEE SMC’97, Orlando 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. L. Gehin and M. Staroswiecki. A formal approach to reconfigurability analysis. Application to the three tank benchmark. Proc. European Control Conference, Karlsruhe 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. L. Gehin, M. Staroswiecki and M. L. Assas. A bottom-up approach to analyse reconfiguration possibilities. 10th International Workshop in Principles of Diagnosis, Loch Awe 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. L. Gehin and M. Staroswiecki. A formal approach to reconfigurability analysis — Application to the three tank benchmark. Proc. European Control Conference, Karlsruhe 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. A. Herrin. Maintainability applications using the matrix FMEA technique. IEEE Trans., R-30: 212–217, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Jalote. Fault Tolerance in Distributed Systems. Prentice-Hall, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. M. Legg. Computerized approach for matrix-form FMEA. IEEE Trans., R-27: 254–257, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lunze, J. Askari-Marnani, A. Cela, P. M. Frank, A. L. Gehin, B. Heiming, M. Lemos, T. Marcu, L. Rato and M. Staroswiecki. Three tank control reconfiguration. In [3].

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Ould Bouamama, A. L. Gehin and M. Staroswiecki. Alarm filtering by component modelling and bond graph approach. 4th IFAC Workshop on On-line Fault Detection and Supervision in the Chemical Process Industries (CHEMFAS-4), Seoul, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Staroswiecki. Distributed system supervision based on intelligent instruments. International Conference on Fault Diagnosis, TOOLDIAG’93, Toulouse 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Staroswiecki and A. L. Gehin. Analysis of system reconfigurability using generic component models. UKACC Control’98, Swansea 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Staroswiecki and M. Bayart. Models and languages for the interoperability of smart instruments. Automatica, 32: 859–873, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Analysis based on components and architecture. In: Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35653-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics