Skip to main content

INEX 2005 Evaluation Measures

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3977))

Abstract

This paper describes the official measures of retrieval effectiveness employed in INEX 2005: the eXtended Cumulated Gain (XCG) measures. In addition, results of correlation analysis are reported, examining the correlation between the employed quantisation functions and the different measures for the INEX 2005 ad-hoc tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conover, W.: Practical Non-Parametric Statistics, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated Gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (ACM TOIS) 20(4), 422–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kando, N., Kuriyama, K., Yoshioka, M.: Information retrieval system evaluation using multi-grade relevance judgements - discussion on averageable single-numbered measures Technical report (2001) (in japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kazai, G., Lalmas, M.: eXtended Cumulated Gain Measures for the Evaluation of Content-oriented XML Retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (ACM TOIS) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kekäläinen, J., Järvelin, K.: Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(13), 1120–1129 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malik, S., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., Fuhr, N.: Overview of INEX 2005. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rijsbergen, C.J.V.: Information Retrieval. Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA, USA (1979), Available at: http://www.dcs.glasgow.ac.uk/Keith/Preface.html

  8. Sakai, T.: New performance metrics based on multigrade relevance: Their application to question answering. In: NTCIR Workshop 4 Meeting Working Notes (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Voorhees, E.M.: Evaluation by highly relevant documents. In: SIGIR 2001: Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 74–82. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kazai, G., Lalmas, M. (2006). INEX 2005 Evaluation Measures. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds) Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation. INEX 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3977. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34963-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34963-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34962-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34963-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics