Skip to main content

Module 3: Diet and Damage Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human - Wildlife Conflicts in Europe

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

Abstract

Data on the diet of an aquatic top predator are essential to assess the impact of predation on the fisheries resources. Quantitative data are sparse however. Field data is usually collected by analysis of undigested parts in the food remains of scats, pellets, or in stomach and intestine of dead animals. Advanced techniques as fatty acid or stable-isotope analysis makes it possible to assess diet of components not leaving identifiable remains and to look at diet over larger time-scales. A general observation is that aquatic predators tend to be opportunistic in their choice of prey. In the absence of field data the assumption can be made that diet reflects local availability of prey of appropriate size for the predator. To analyse real or perceived resource competition calculation of the amount consumed by the predator should be based on current and methodologically sound data. A simple comparison of the mass or number of a resource species taken by the predator and the fishery respectively can be highly misleading. An analysis should always be made in an ecosystem context, taking size distribution and density dependence into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bruckmeier K, Westerberg H, Varjopuro R (2013) Reconciliation in practice: the seal conflict and its mitigation in Sweden and Finland. In: Klenke R, Ring I, Kranz A, Jepsen N, Rauschmayer R, Henle K (eds) Human-wildlife conflicts in Europe–fisheries and fish-eating vertebrates as a model case. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski M, Marzec M (2003) Correction factors used for estimating prey biomass in the diet of American mink (Mustela vison). Acta Theriol 48:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieperink C, Bak BD, Pedersen LF, Pedersen MI, Pedersen S (2002) Predation on Atlantic salmon and sea trout during their first days as postsmolts. J Fish Biol 61:848–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dove H, Mayes RW (1996) Plant wax components. A new approach to estimating intake and diet composition in herbivores. J Nutr 126:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdiani JM, Kohn MH (2001) Genotyping faeces links individuals to their diet. Ecol Lett 4:477–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjälling A (2005) The estimation of hidden seal-inflicted losses in the Baltic set-trap salmon fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1630–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas D, Gomes J, Sales Luís T, Madruga L, Marques C, Baptista G, Rosalino LM, Antunes P, Santos M, Santos-Reis R (2007) Otters and fish farms in the Sado Estuary: ecological and socio-economic basis of a conflict. Hydrobiologia 587:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop EJ (1980) Stomach content analysis—a review of methods and their application. J Fish Biol 17:411–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson SJ, Field C, Bowen WD, Blanchard W (2004) Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis, a new method of estimating predator diets. Ecol Monogr 74:211–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen L, Hansen HM (1996) Analysis of otter (Lutra lutra) spraints. Part 1, comparison of methods to estimate prey proportions; part 2, Estimation of the size of prey fish. J Zool 238:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen N, Klenke R, Sonnesen P, Bregnballe T (2010) The use of coded wire tags to estimate cormorant predation on fish stocks in an estuary. Mar Freshw Res 61:320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen N, Olesen T (2013) Cormorants in Denmark—re-enforced management and scientific evidence. In: Klenke R, Ring I, Kranz A, Jepsen N, Rauschmayer F, Henle K (eds) Human-wildlife conflicts in Europe—fisheries and fish-eating vertebrates as a model case. Springe, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobling M, Breiby A (1986) The use and abuse of fish otoliths in studies of feeding habits of marine piscivores. Sarsia 71:265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvaitis JA (2000) Investigating food habits of terrestrial vertebrates. In: Boitani L, Kuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 165–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundström K, Hjerne O, Alexandersson A, Karlsson O (2007) Estimation of grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) diet composition in the Baltic Sea. In Haug T, Hammill M, Olafsdóttir D (eds) NAMMCO Sci Publ 6. NAMMCO Tromsø, pp 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunneryd SG, Hemmingsson M, Tärnlund S, Fjälling A (2005) A voluntary logbook scheme as a method of monitoring the by-catch of seals in Swedish coastal fishery. ICES CM2005/X:04, 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce GJ, Boyle PR (1991) A review of methods for diet analysis in piscivorous marine mammals. In Barnes M, Barnes H (eds). Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 29:409–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell I, Kinsman DA, Ives MJ, Finney J, Murrell M (2003) The use of coded-wire microtags to assess prey selectivity and foraging behaviour in Great Cormorants. Vogelwelt 124:245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Symondson WOC (2002) Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Mol Ecol 11:327–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szepanski MM, Ben-David M, Van Ballenberghe V (1999) Assessment of anadromous salmon resources in the diet of the Alexander Archipelago wolf using stable isotope analysis. Oecologica 120:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollit DJ, Steward MJ, Thompson PM, Pierce GJ, Santos MB, Hughes S (1997) Species and size differences in the digestion of otoliths and beaks, implications for estimates of pinniped diet composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trites AW (2003) Food webs in the ocean, who eats whom and how much? In: Sinclair M, Valdimarsson G (eds) Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. FAO. Rome and CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 125–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Håkan Westerberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Westerberg, H., Henle, K. (2013). Module 3: Diet and Damage Assessment. In: Klenke, R., Ring, I., Kranz, A., Jepsen, N., Rauschmayer, F., Henle, K. (eds) Human - Wildlife Conflicts in Europe. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34789-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics