Abstract
Data on the diet of an aquatic top predator are essential to assess the impact of predation on the fisheries resources. Quantitative data are sparse however. Field data is usually collected by analysis of undigested parts in the food remains of scats, pellets, or in stomach and intestine of dead animals. Advanced techniques as fatty acid or stable-isotope analysis makes it possible to assess diet of components not leaving identifiable remains and to look at diet over larger time-scales. A general observation is that aquatic predators tend to be opportunistic in their choice of prey. In the absence of field data the assumption can be made that diet reflects local availability of prey of appropriate size for the predator. To analyse real or perceived resource competition calculation of the amount consumed by the predator should be based on current and methodologically sound data. A simple comparison of the mass or number of a resource species taken by the predator and the fishery respectively can be highly misleading. An analysis should always be made in an ecosystem context, taking size distribution and density dependence into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bruckmeier K, Westerberg H, Varjopuro R (2013) Reconciliation in practice: the seal conflict and its mitigation in Sweden and Finland. In: Klenke R, Ring I, Kranz A, Jepsen N, Rauschmayer R, Henle K (eds) Human-wildlife conflicts in Europe–fisheries and fish-eating vertebrates as a model case. Springer, Heidelberg
Brzezinski M, Marzec M (2003) Correction factors used for estimating prey biomass in the diet of American mink (Mustela vison). Acta Theriol 48:247–254
Dieperink C, Bak BD, Pedersen LF, Pedersen MI, Pedersen S (2002) Predation on Atlantic salmon and sea trout during their first days as postsmolts. J Fish Biol 61:848–852
Dove H, Mayes RW (1996) Plant wax components. A new approach to estimating intake and diet composition in herbivores. J Nutr 126:13–26
Ferdiani JM, Kohn MH (2001) Genotyping faeces links individuals to their diet. Ecol Lett 4:477–483
Fjälling A (2005) The estimation of hidden seal-inflicted losses in the Baltic set-trap salmon fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1630–1635
Freitas D, Gomes J, Sales Luís T, Madruga L, Marques C, Baptista G, Rosalino LM, Antunes P, Santos M, Santos-Reis R (2007) Otters and fish farms in the Sado Estuary: ecological and socio-economic basis of a conflict. Hydrobiologia 587:51–62
Hyslop EJ (1980) Stomach content analysis—a review of methods and their application. J Fish Biol 17:411–429
Iverson SJ, Field C, Bowen WD, Blanchard W (2004) Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis, a new method of estimating predator diets. Ecol Monogr 74:211–253
Jacobsen L, Hansen HM (1996) Analysis of otter (Lutra lutra) spraints. Part 1, comparison of methods to estimate prey proportions; part 2, Estimation of the size of prey fish. J Zool 238:167–180
Jepsen N, Klenke R, Sonnesen P, Bregnballe T (2010) The use of coded wire tags to estimate cormorant predation on fish stocks in an estuary. Mar Freshw Res 61:320–329
Jepsen N, Olesen T (2013) Cormorants in Denmark—re-enforced management and scientific evidence. In: Klenke R, Ring I, Kranz A, Jepsen N, Rauschmayer F, Henle K (eds) Human-wildlife conflicts in Europe—fisheries and fish-eating vertebrates as a model case. Springe, Heidelberg
Jobling M, Breiby A (1986) The use and abuse of fish otoliths in studies of feeding habits of marine piscivores. Sarsia 71:265–274
Litvaitis JA (2000) Investigating food habits of terrestrial vertebrates. In: Boitani L, Kuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 165–190
Lundström K, Hjerne O, Alexandersson A, Karlsson O (2007) Estimation of grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) diet composition in the Baltic Sea. In Haug T, Hammill M, Olafsdóttir D (eds) NAMMCO Sci Publ 6. NAMMCO Tromsø, pp 177–196
Lunneryd SG, Hemmingsson M, Tärnlund S, Fjälling A (2005) A voluntary logbook scheme as a method of monitoring the by-catch of seals in Swedish coastal fishery. ICES CM2005/X:04, 10
Pierce GJ, Boyle PR (1991) A review of methods for diet analysis in piscivorous marine mammals. In Barnes M, Barnes H (eds). Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 29:409–486
Russell I, Kinsman DA, Ives MJ, Finney J, Murrell M (2003) The use of coded-wire microtags to assess prey selectivity and foraging behaviour in Great Cormorants. Vogelwelt 124:245–253
Symondson WOC (2002) Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Mol Ecol 11:327–641
Szepanski MM, Ben-David M, Van Ballenberghe V (1999) Assessment of anadromous salmon resources in the diet of the Alexander Archipelago wolf using stable isotope analysis. Oecologica 120:327–335
Tollit DJ, Steward MJ, Thompson PM, Pierce GJ, Santos MB, Hughes S (1997) Species and size differences in the digestion of otoliths and beaks, implications for estimates of pinniped diet composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:105–119
Trites AW (2003) Food webs in the ocean, who eats whom and how much? In: Sinclair M, Valdimarsson G (eds) Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. FAO. Rome and CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 125–141
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Westerberg, H., Henle, K. (2013). Module 3: Diet and Damage Assessment. In: Klenke, R., Ring, I., Kranz, A., Jepsen, N., Rauschmayer, F., Henle, K. (eds) Human - Wildlife Conflicts in Europe. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34789-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34789-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34788-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34789-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)