Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ardis M, Weiss D.: Defining Families: The Commonality Analysis. ICSE 97 Tutorial 4D (1997).
Atkinson C. Bayer J., Muthig D.: Component-Based Product Line Engineering: The KobrA Approach. In Proceedings of the First International Product Line Conference (SPLC1). Denver, Colorado, USA, (2000) 289-310.
Atkinson, C. Bayer, J. Bunse, C. Kamsties, E. Laitenberger, O. Laqua, R. Muthig, D. Paech, B. Wüst, J., Zettel J.: Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley (2001).
Bayer, J., Flege, O., Knauber, P., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Schmid, K., Widen, T., DeBaud, J.-M.: PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines. Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR'99) (1999) 122-131.
Becker M, Geyer L, Gilbert A, Becker K.: Comprehensive Variability Modelling to Facilitate Efficient Variability Treatment, PFE 2001, (2001) 294-303.
Becker M.: Towards a General Model of Variability in Product Families. In Software Variability Management Workshop (2003) 19-27.
Cerón, R., J.L. Arciniegas, J.L. Ruiz, J.C. Dueñas, J. Bermejo, and R. Capilla. Architectural Modelling in Product Family Context. in Software Architecture, First European Workshop, EWSA 2004. St An-drews, UK, Springer LNCS 3047 (2004) 25-42.
Clauss, M.: Generic Modelling using UML extensions for variability. Presented at OOPSLA workshop 2001, Tampa Bay, Florida, USA (2001).
Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.: Generative Programming, Methods, Tools, and Applications, Addison-Wesley. (2000).
Dobrica L, Niemelä E.: UML Notation Extension for Product Line Architectures Modelling. In Pro- ceedings of International Workshop on Software Variability Management (SVM), ICSE'03 (2003) 8-13.
Engineering Software Architectures, Processes and Platforms for System-Families (ESAPS), Eureka 2034, ITEA project 99005, http://www.esi.es/esaps/.
From Concepts to Application in System-Family Engineering (CAFÉ), Eureka 2023, ITEA project ip00004, http://www.esi.es/Cafe/.
Gérard, S., Terrier, F., Tanguy Y.: Using the Model Paradigm for Real-Time Systems Development: ACCORD/UML. OOIS ’ 02-MDSD. Montpellier: Springer LNCS 2426 (2002) 260-269.
Gérard, S., The ACCORD/UML methodology. Internal report CEA-List, Paris. (2003).
Greenfield, J., Short, K.: Software Factories: Assembling Applications with Patterns, Frameworks, Models & Tools, John Wiley & Sons (2004).
Haugen, O., Møller-Pedersen, B., Oldevik J.: Comparison of System Family Modeling Approaches. SPLC 2005. Rennes, France. Springer LNCS 3714 (2005) 102-112.
ITU, Recommendation Z.100, ITU Specification and Description Language. Reed, R. Editor., ITU-T: Geneva. (1999) 300p.
Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) ASEI technical report: CMU/SEI-90-TR-21. (1990).
Kang, Lee, Lee, Kim.: Feature Oriented Product Line Software Engineering: Principles and Guidelines Book Chapter: Domain Oriented Systems Development - Practices and Perspectives, UK, Gordon Breach Science Publishers, (2002).
Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P., Visual domain-specific modelling: Benefits and experiences of using meta-CASE tools, International workshop on Model Engineering, ECOOP 2000, (ed. Bezivin, J., Ernst, J.) (2000).
Kelly, S., Tools for Domain-Specific Modeling. Dr. Dobb’s journal, September, (2004).
Kieburtz, R. et al.: A Software Engineering Experiment in Software Component Generation, Proceed-ings of 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, Berlin, IEEE Computer Society Press. (1996) 542-553.
Muthig D.: A Light-weight Approach Facilitating an Evolutionary Transition Towards Software Prod-uct Lines, Ph.D. Thesis, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, (2002).
OMG Unified Modelling Language: Superstructure, Version 2.0, formal/05-07-04, OMG (2005).
Rioux, L., et al.: Style, structures and views for handling commonalities and variabilities. Eureka 6! 2023 Programme, ITEA project 99005 (2001).
Tolvanen, J-.P.: Keeping it in the family, Application Development Advisor, July-August, 2002, 101 Communications (2002).
Weiss, D., Lai, C. T. R.: Software Product-line Engineering, Addison Wesley (1999).
Ziadi, T., Jézéquel, J.-M., Fondement, F.: Product line derivation with UML. Software Variability Management Workshop.. University of Groningen Department of Mathematics and Computing Sci-ence (2003).
Ziadi, T., Helouet, L., Jezequel, J.-M.: Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines. Fifth Inter-national Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-05). Siena, Italy. LNCS 3014 (2003) 129-139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayer, J. et al. (2006). Consolidated Product Line Variability Modeling. In: Käköla, T., Duenas, J.C. (eds) Software Product Lines. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33252-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33253-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)