Skip to main content

The ScenTED Method for Testing Software Product Lines

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertolino, A., Gnesi, S.: PLUTO: a test methodology for product families. In: Software Product-Family Engineering, ed by van der Linden, F., 5th International Workshop, Siena, Italy, November 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2003) pp 181-197

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertolino, A., Gnesi, S.: Use case-based testing of product lines. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Soft-ware Engineering Conference & 11th SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSM, Helsinki, Finland, September 2003, ed by Inveradi, P. (ACM, New York 2003) pp 355-358

    Google Scholar 

  3. Binder, R.V.: Testing Object-Oriented Systems - Models, Patterns, and Tools (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briand, L., Labiche, Y.: A UML-based approach to system testing. J. Softw. Syst. Model. (SoSyM) 1(1), 10-42 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cockburn, A.: Writing Effective Use Cases (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geppert, B., Li, J., Rößler, F., Weiss, D.M.: Towards generating acceptance tests for product lines. In: Soft-ware Reuse: Methods, Techniques, and Tools, ed by Bosch, J., Krueger, C., 8th International Conference, ICSR 2004, Madrid, Spain, July 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3107 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2004) pp 35-48

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goetz, H., Kamsties, E., Neumann, J., Pohl, K., Reis, S., Reuys, A., Weingärtner, J.: Testing a product line of radiology systems at Siemens. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Software Validation for Healthcare (CSVHC 2005), Düsseldorf, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Halmans, G., Pohl, K.: Communicating the variability of a software product family to customers. J. Softw. Syst. Model. 2(1), 15-36 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartmann, J., Vieira, M., Ruder, A.: UML-based approach for validating product lines. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Product Line Testing - SPLiT, Boston, USA, August 2004, ed by Geppert, B., Krueger, C., Li, J.J, Avaya labs technical report, ALR-2004-031 (2004) pp 58-64

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kamsties, E., Pohl, K., Reis, S., Reuys, A.: Testing variabilities in use case models. In: Software Product-Family Engineering, ed by van der Linden, F., 5th International Workshop, Siena, Italy, November 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2003) pp 6-18

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamsties, E., Pohl, K., Reis, S., Reuys, A.: Anforderungsbasiertes Testen. In: Software-Produktlinien -Methoden, Einführung und Praxis, dpunkt, Heidelberg (in German), ed by Böckle, G., Knauber, P., Pohl, K., Schmid, K. (2004) Chapter 10, pp 119-136

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kamsties, E., Pohl, K., Reuys, A.: Supporting test case derivation in domain engineering. In: Proceedings of the 7th Biennial World Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology, IDPT, Austin, USA, De-cember 2003), ed by Ertas, A. et al, vol 2 (Society for Design and Process Science, USA 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGregor, J.D.: Testing a software product line. Technical report SEI, CMU/SEI-2001-TR-022 (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, USA 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Myers, G.J.: The Art of Software Testing (Wiley, New York 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nebut, C., Pickin, S., Le Traon, Y., Jezequel, J.-M.: Reusable test requirements for UML-modeled product lines. In: Proceeding of the International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines, Essen, Germany, September 2002, ed by Geppert, B., Schmid, K., Technical report, ALR-2002-033 (Avaya Labs, Basking Ridge 2002) pp 51-56

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nebut, C., Fleurey, F., Le Traon, Y., Jézéquel, J.-M.: A requirement-based approach to test product families. In: Software Product-Family Engineering, ed by van der Linden, F., 5th International Workshop, Siena, Italy, November 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2003) pp 198-210

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering - Foundations, Principles, and Techniques (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Reuys, A., Götz, H., Neumann, J., Weingärtner, J.: Medizintechnik bei Siemens AG Medical Solutions HS IM. In: Software-Produktlinien - Methoden, Einführung und Praxis, dpunkt, Heidelberg (in German), ed by Böckle, G., Knauber, P., Pohl, K., Schmid, K. (2004), pp 247-260

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reuys, A., Kamsties, E., Pohl, K., Götz, H., Neumann, J., Weingärtner, J.: Testen von Software-Produktvarianten - Ein Erfahrungsbericht. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (in German), MKWI, Essen, March 2004, ed by Adelsberger, H.H., Eicker, S., Krcmar, H., Pawlowski, J.M., Pohl, K., Rombach, D., Wulf, V., vol 1 (Akademische, Berlin 2004) pp 244-259

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reuys, A., Kamsties, E., Pohl, K., Reis, S.: Model-based system testing of software product families. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2005, Porto, Portugal, June 2005, ed by Pastor, O., Falcao, E., Cunha, J. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3520 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2005) pp 519-534

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reuys, A., Reis, S., Kamsties, E., Pohl, K.: Derivation of domain test scenarios from activity diagrams. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Product Line Engineering: The Early Steps: Planning, Model-ing, and Managing, PLEES’03, Erfurt, Germany, September 2003, ed by Schmid, K., Geppert, B., IESE-report no. 139.03/E Fraunhofer IESE 2003, pp 35-41

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tevanlinna, A., Taina, J., Kauppinen, R. Product family testing - a survey. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 29(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Unified Modeling Language Specification (OMG), Object Management Group Document. http://www. omg.org/docs/formal/03-03-01.pdf (2003)

  24. Winter, M.: Qualitätssicherung für objektorientierte Software - Anforderungsermittlung und Test gegen die Anforderungsspezifikation (in German). Dissertation, FernUniversität Hagen, 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reuys, A., Reis, S., Kamsties, E., Pohl, K. (2006). The ScenTED Method for Testing Software Product Lines. In: Käköla, T., Duenas, J.C. (eds) Software Product Lines. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33253-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33252-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33253-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics