Skip to main content

Radiology of Craniofacial Fractures

  • Chapter

Abstract

Until a few years ago, conventional X-rays were the imaging standard for cranio-cerebral and facial traumata. Today, however, computed tomography (CT) has become the primary imaging method, along with significant technical improvements, especially with the development of multislice CT.

Conventional X-rays are relatively sensitive to cranial vault fractures, but insensitive to fractures of the skull base and facial skeleton. CT enables a precise diagnosis of all kind of fractures of the facial skeleton and skull base, and additionally delivers information about intracranial bleeding and injuries to the cerebrum. In the multi-traumatized patient, CT can be extended to the cervical spine as well as the trunk if necessary. A complete body check for traumatic lesions can be done within a few minutes, including the brain, spine, bone, and organs. Thus, conventional X-rays of the skull are no longer used in the case of head traumas or polytraumatized patients; CT is widely accepted as the primary imaging method of choice. Nevertheless, the following provides an overview of all imaging methods, including conventional X-rays.

Contributed by Thomas Treumann, Kantonsspital Luzern (CH), Central Institute of Radiology, Luzern, Switzerland

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowley NB (2003). Radiographic Assessment. In: PW Booth, Eppley BL, Schmelzeisen R (eds), Maxillofacial trauma and aesthetic facial reconstruction. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull HG, Ganzer U, Gruentzig J, Schirmer M (1989). Traumatologie des Hirn- und Gesichtsschädels. Urban und Schwarzenberg: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellrich NC, Schramm A, Hammer B, Schmelzeisen R (1999). The value of computer-aided planning and intraoperative navigation in orbital reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28 (Suppl 1): 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellrich NC, Schramm A, Schmelzeisen R (2003). Clinical application of computer-assisted reconstruction in complex posttraumatic deformities. In: P Ward-Booth, BL Eppley, R Schmelzeisen (eds), Maxillofacial trauma and esthetic facial reconstruction. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, pp 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassfeld S, Mühling J, Zöller J (1998). Possibilities and developments of intraoperative image-guided surgery in craniofacial surgery. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2: 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joss U, Piffko J, Meyer U (2001). Behandlung von frontobasalen Traumen und Polytraumen. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 5: 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann U, Rickels E, Krettek C (2001). Multiple trauma with craniocerebral trauma. Early definitive surgical management of long bone fractures. Unfallchirurg 104, 3: 196–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manson PN, Markowitz B, Mirvis S, Dunham M, Yaremchuk M (1990). Toward CT-based facial fracture treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 85, 2: 202–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Probst C, Tomaschett C (1990). The neurosurgical treatment of traumatic frontobasal spinal fluid fistulas (1982–1986). Akt Traumatol 20, 5: 217–225.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rother UJ (2000). Traumatologie. In: F Sitzmann (ed), Zahn-Mund-Kieferkrankheiten Atlas der bildgebenden Diagnostik. Urban und Fischer: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider G, Tölly E (1984). Radiologische Diagnostik des Gesichtsschädels. Thieme: Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenzer N, Pfeifer G (1987). Bildgebende Untersuchungs­verfahren in der Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 32. Thieme: Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrier F, Raveh J, Burckhardt B (1984). Conventional tomography and computed tomography for the diagnosis of frontobasal fractures. Ann Radiol (Paris) 27, 5: 391–399.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yokata H, Kurowa A, Otsuka T (1991). Significance of MRI in acute head injury. J Trauma 1: 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker KW, Krebs Al, Abbasi KH, Dias PS (1998). Compound anterior cranial base fractures classification using computerized to mograph scanning as a basis for selection of patients for dural repair. J Neurosurg 88: 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hardt, N., Kuttenberger, J. (2010). Radiology of Craniofacial Fractures. In: Hardt, N., Kuttenberger, J. (eds) Craniofacial Trauma. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33041-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33041-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33040-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33041-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics