Skip to main content

Plant Species Migration as a Key Uncertainty in Predicting Future Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystems: Progress and Challenges

  • Chapter
Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World

Part of the book series: Global Change — The IGBP Series ((GLOBALCHANGE))

11.5 Summary and Conclusions

As we show above, a failure to incorporate migration limitations into models of vegetation response to climate change greatly compromises their predictive capability, and the uncertainty due to migration is therefore substantial. Species range shifts have been a ubiquitous response by plant species during Pleistocene climate change, and early signs of this response are evident in modern assemblages. Recent work has increased our understanding of the dispersal limitations to migration rate, but there has been far less focus on the issues which govern population establishment and growth rate, especially at the edge of species’ ranges.

An overall understanding of community responses to climate change would also benefit from better understanding of in situ adaptive responses, as these appear to be significant in some species. Much has been learned from reconstructions of past migration patterns in the paleo-record, and from studies of alien invasive plants, but these “natural experiments” are limited in that they represent special cases where species migration occurs over landscapes unfragmented by human activities (paleo- record), or are experiencing release from predators and pathogens (alien species).

Finally, promising approaches are being developed that address the issue of how human transformation of landscapes will modify migration rates, and that combine mechanistic migration models with spatially explicit models of species geographic ranges at spatial scales relevant to simulating plant propagule dispersal and demographic behavior. These approaches will provide useful insights into biodiversity change under climate and landuse change scenarios. However, the potential increase in spatial resolution of DGVM simulations, and their increasing capacity to simulate more finely defined plant functional types, will allow them to provide an independent alternative assessment of the role of migration in determining the future structure and function of the ecosystems of the Earth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson RP, Gomez-Laverde M, Peterson AT (2002) Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Williams P (2000) Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data. Biological Conservation 96:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Cabeza M, Thuiller W, Hannah L, Williams PH (2004) Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Global Change Biology 10:1618–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP, Smith TM (1989) A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 83:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP, Nicholls AO, Doherty MD, Meyers JA (1994) Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a beta-function. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelet D, et al. (2003) Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17(2), 1045, doi:10.1029/2001GB001508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakkenes M, Alkemade JRM, Ihle F, Leemans R, Latour JB (2002) Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology 8:390–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky CW (1987) Response of vegetation to climate changes of different duration in the late Neogene. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2:247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier C, et al. (2004) Novel approaches to study climate change effects on terrestrial ecosystems in the field: Drought and passive nighttime warming. Ecosystems 7:583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks HJB (1986) Late-Quaternary biotic changes in terrestrial and lacustrine environments, with particular reference to north-west Europe. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of Holocene Paleoecology and Paleohydrology. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Birks HJB (1993) Quaternary paleoecology and vegetation science — current contributions and possible future developments. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 79:153–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001) Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. TREE 16:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Midgley GF, Woodward FI (2003) The importance of low atmospheric CO2 and fire in promoting the spread of grasslands and savannas. Global Change Biology 9:973–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box EO (1996) Plant functional types and climate at the global scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer AM, Gaston KJ (2003) The geographical range structure of the holly leaf-miner. II. Demographic rates. Journal of Animal Ecology 72:82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS (1998) Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleo-record. American Naturalist 152:204–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, et al. (1998) Reid’s paradox of rapid plant migration: dispersal theory and interpretation of palaeoecological records. BioScience 48:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Lewis M, McLachlan JS, HilleRisLambers J (2003) Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well? Ecology 84:1979–1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingham YC, Huntley B (2000) Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecological Applications 10:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingham YC, Hill MO, Huntley B (1996) The migration of sessile organisms: a simulation model with measurable parameters. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:831–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer W, et al. (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biology 7:357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cwynar LC, MacDonald GM (1987) Geographical variation of lodgepole pine in relation to population history. American Naturalist 129:463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MB (1976) Pleistocene biogeography of temperate deciduous forests. Geoscience and Man 13:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MB (1983) Holocene vegetational history of the eastern United States. In: Wright HE (ed) Late-Quaternary environments of the United States. University of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptative responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S (1998a) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AJ, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Jenkinson LS (1998b) Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental change. Journal of Animal Ecology 67:600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, Levis S, Prentice IC, Pollard D, Thompsons SL (1998) Coupling dynamics models of climate and vegetation. Global Change Biology 4:561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco M, Silvertown J (2004) A comparative demography of plants based upon elasticities of vital rates. Ecology 85:531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham RW (1992) Late pleistocene faunal changes as a guide to understanding effects of greenhous warming on the mammalian fauna of North America. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy T (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale University, New Haven and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampe A (2004) Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and waht they hide. Global Ecology & Biogeography 13:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecology Letters 8(5):461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L, Midgley GF, Millar D (2002) Climate change integrated conservation strategies. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, et al. (2003) Forecasting plant migration rates: managing uncertainty for risk assessment. Journal of Ecology 91:341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: The role of long-distance dispersal. American Naturalist 153:464–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Richardson DM, Cowling RM (2001) Validation of a spatial simulation model of a spreading alien plant population. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Nathan R, Cain ML (2003) Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84(8):1945–1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ (2000) Land-use changes and invasions. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs HA (eds) The impact of global change on alien species. Island Press, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson DJ, Thompson K (1997) Plant dispersal: the role of man. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1481–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman MH (2001) The distribution of Senecio vulgaris: capacity of climate change models for predicting adventitious ranges. Flora 196:395–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Holoyac M (2000) Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant populations and communities. The American Naturalist 156:378–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? TREE 15:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B (1990) European post-glacial forests: compositional changes in response to climate change. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B, Birks HJB (1983) An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe o-13000 years ago. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B, Webb TI (1988) Vegetation history. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B, Berry PM, Cramer W, McDonald AP (1995) Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response. Journal of Biogeography 22:967–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson LR, Prasad AM (2002) Potential redistribution of tree species habitat under five climate change scenarios in the eastern US. Forest Ecology and Management 155:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson LR, Schwartz MW, Prasad A (2004) How fast and far might tree species migrate in the eastern United States due to climate change? Global Ecology & Biogeography 13:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson R (2003) Global patterns in endemism explained by past climatic change. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 270:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH, Martin PS (1982) Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane R, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotoc plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirilenko AP, Belotelov NV, Bogatyrev BG (2000) Global model of vegetation migration: incorporation of climatic variability. Ecological Modelling 132:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant trait: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16:545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (1995) Dispersal of annual plants in hierarchically structured landscapes. Landscape Ecology 10: 277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwick JR, Austin MP (2001) Competitive interactions between tree species in New Zealand’s old-growth indigenous forests. Ecology 82:2560–2573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA (1995) The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76:1371–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C, LeBlanc D (1996) Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests: A critical review. Ecological Modelling 90:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald GM (1993) Fossil pollen analysis and the re-construction of plant invasions. Advances in Ecological Research 24:67–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malanson GP (2003) Dispersal across continuous and binary representations of landscapes. Ecological Modelling 169:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm JR, Markham A, Neilson RP, Garaci M (2002) Estimated migration rates under scenarios of global climate change. Journal of Biogeography 29:835–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClachlan JS, Clark JS (2004) Reconstructing historical ranges with fossil data at continental scales. Forest Ecology and Management 197:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DJ, Cowling RM (1995) Towards a profile of an endemic mountain fynbos flora: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 72:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.C, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Perry G, Cronin JT, Strand AE, Cain ML (2003) Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal. Oikos 103:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson RP, Pitelka LF, Solomon AM, Nathan R, Midgley GF, Fragoso JMV, Lischke H, Thompson K (2005) Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change. BioScience 55:749–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert M, Caswell H (2000) Demography and dispersal: Calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology 81:1613–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak CL, Nowak RS, Tausch RJ, Wigand PE (1994) Tree and shrub dynamics in northwestern Great Basin woodland and shrub steppe during the late-Pleistocene and Holocene. American Journal of Botany 81:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, et al. (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399:578–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TE (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology & Biogeography 12: 361–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT (2001) Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. The Condor 103:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geogaphy of species’ invasions via ecological niche modellingg. The Quarterly Review of Biology 78:419–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Vieglais DA (2001) Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, et al. (2002) Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416:626–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Papes M, Kluza DA (2003) Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Science 51:863–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka LF, et al. (1997) Plant migration and climate change. American Scientist 85:464–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice IC (1986) Vegetation response to past climatic variation. Vegetatio 67:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography 19:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt GE, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton jr. DA (1999) Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: Niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecological Monographs 69: 375–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek M, Richardon DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2004) Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Mooney HA, McNeely JA, Neville L, Schei PJ, Waage J (eds) Invasive alien species: searching for solutions, Island, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, et al. (2000) Invasive alien organisms and global change: A South African Perspective. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs HA (eds) The impact of global change on alien species. Island Press, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley HN (1930) The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Reeve, Ashford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagarin RD, Gaines SD (2002) The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecology Letters 5:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MW, Iverson LR, Prasad AM (2001) Predicting the potential future distribution of four tree species in Ohio using current habitat availability and climatic forcing. Ecosystems 4:568–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Takeda, Y (1995) Modelling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. American Naturalist 146:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart HH, Smith TM, Post WM (1992) The application of individual-based simulation models for assessing the effects of global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitch S, et al. (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Global Change Biology 9:161–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (1997) Plant Functional Types, Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Prentice IC, Sykes MT (2001) Representation of vegetation dynamics in modelling of European ecosystems: comparison of two contrasting approaches. Global Ecology & Biogeography 10 (ETEMA special issue):621–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon AM (1986) Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: simulation modeling experiments in eastern North America. Oecologia 68:567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst RW, Maywald HF, Russel BL (2000) Estimating vulnerability under global change: modular modelling of pests. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 82:303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, et al. (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W (2003) BIOMOD: Optimising predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biology 9:1353–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species’ range shifts under climate change. Global Change Biology 10:2020–2027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rheede van Oudtshoorn K, van Rooyen MW (1999) Dispersal biology of desert plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetich JA, Waite TA (2003) Spatial patterns of demography and genetic processes across the species’ range: Null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 4:639–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther G-R, Burga CA, Edwards PJ (2001) Fingerprints of climate change — adapted behaviour and shifting species ranges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther G-R, et al. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb TI (1981) The past 11,000 years of vegetational change in eastern North America. BioScience 31:501–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb TI (1992) Past changes in vegetation and climate: lessons for the future. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy TE (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale University, New Haven and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Welk E, Schubert K, Hoffman MH (2002) Present and potential distribution of invasive garlic mustard (Allaria petiolata) in North America. Diversity and Distribution 8:219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward FI, Smith TM, Emanuel WR (1995) A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9:471–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Midgley, G.F., Thuiller, W., Higgins, S.I. (2007). Plant Species Migration as a Key Uncertainty in Predicting Future Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystems: Progress and Challenges. In: Canadell, J.G., Pataki, D.E., Pitelka, L.F. (eds) Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World. Global Change — The IGBP Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32730-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics