Skip to main content

Explaining the Structure of FrameNet with Concept Lattices

  • Conference paper
  • 578 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3403))

Abstract

This paper reports on ongoing work to use Formal Concept Analysis as an auxiliary tool in understanding and visualising the wealth of data produced by lexical-resource building as embodied in the construction of FrameNet, a database to capture the syntax and semantics of language use in Frame Linguistics. We present proof of the abundance of concept lattices both in the theory of frames and in its present day incarnation, the FrameNet resource, with contributions that range from data-visualisation to the fine-tuning of some lexico-theoretical concepts better understood in terms of Formal Concept Analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Johnson, C.R., Petruck, M.R., Baker, C.F., Ellsworth, M., Ruppenhofer, J., Fillmore, C.J.: FrameNet: Theory and Practice, 1.1 st edn. International Computer Science Institute, 1947, CenterBerkeley, USA (2003), Available as: http://www.framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/framenet/book/book.html

  2. Petruck, M.R.L.: Frame Semantics. In: Verschueren, J., Östman, J.O., Blommaert, J., Bulcaen, C. (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Philadelphia (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fillmore, C.J., Ruppenhoffer, J., Baker, C.F.: FrameNet and Representing the Link between Semantic and Syntactic Relations. In: Frontiers in Linguistics I. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series B, Academia Sinica, pp. 19–62 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kipke, U., Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse erläutert an einem Wordfelt. LDV Forum (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grosskopf, A.: Formal Concept Analysis of verb paradigms in Linguistics. In: Diday, E., Opitz, Y.L., Lechevallier, O. (eds.) Ordinal and Symbolic Data Analysis, pp. 70–79. Springer, Berlin (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grosskopf, A., Harras, G.: Begriffiche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben. In: Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Begriffiche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, pp. 273–295. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Priss, U.E.: Linguistic applications of Formal Concept analysis. In: Concept Lattices. First International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, ICFCA 2003. Springer, Heidelberg (2003) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Priss, U.E.: Signs and formal concepts. In: [18], pp. 28–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Priss, U.E.: Relational Concept Analysis: Semantic structures in dictionaries and lexical databases. PhD thesis, Technical University of Darmstadt, Aachen, Germany (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Priss, U.E.: The formalization of WordNet by methods of Relational Cencept Analysis. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database and some of its Applications, pp. 179–196. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Old, L.J.: Unlocking thesemantics of Roget’s Thesaurus using Formal ConceptAnalysis. In: [18], pp. 244–251

    Google Scholar 

  12. Priss, U., Old, L.J.: Modellinglex lexical databases with Formal Concept Analysis. Journal of Computer Science 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sporleder, A.: Galois Lattice approach to lexical inheritance hierarchy learning. In: ECAI 2002 Workshop on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Ontology Engineering (OLT 2002), Lyon, France (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petersen, W.: A set-theoretical approach for the induction of inheritance hierarchies. Language and Computation 1, 1–14 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal cencept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davey, B., Priestley, H.: Introduction to lattices and order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yevtushenko, S.A.: System of data analysis “concept explorer” (in Russian). In: Proceedings of the 7th national conference on Artificial Intelligence KII 2000, Russia, pp. 127–134. ACM, New York (2000), http://sourceforge.net/projects/conexp

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eklund, P. (ed.): ICFA 2004 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conferenon Formal Concept Analysis, Sydney, Australia. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2961. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Valverde-Albacete, F.J. (2005). Explaining the Structure of FrameNet with Concept Lattices. In: Ganter, B., Godin, R. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis. ICFCA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3403. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32262-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32262-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24525-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32262-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics