Abstract
Argumentation-based techniques are being increasingly used to construct frameworks for flexible negotiation among computational agents. Despite the advancements made to date, the relationship between argument-based negotiation and bargaining frameworks has been rather informal. This paper presents a preliminary investigation into understanding this relationship. To this end, we present a set of negotiation concepts through which we analyse both bargaining and argumentation-based methods. We demonstrate that if agents have false beliefs, then they may make decisions during negotiation that lead them to suboptimal deals. We then describe different ways in which argument-based communication can cause changes in an agent’s beliefs and, consequently, its preferences over contracts. This enables us to demonstrate how the argumentation-based approach can improve both the likelihood and quality of deals.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., Maudet, N.: Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In: Horn, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), pp. 338–342. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)
Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, Inc. Publishers, New York (1984)
Chavez, A., Maes, P.: Kasbah: An agent marketplace for buying and selling goods. In: First International Conference on the Practical Appication of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (1996)
Faratin, P.: Automated Service Negotiation Between Autonomous Computational Agents. PhD thesis, University of London, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Department of Electronic Engineering (2000)
Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2), 205–237 (2002)
Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R.: Multi-issue negotiation under time constraints. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 143–150. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Fisher, R., Ury, W., Patton, B.: Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 2nd edn. Penguin Books, New York (1991)
Harsanyi, J.C.: Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games: a critical discussion of Zeuthen’s, Hicks’, and Nash’s theories. Econometrica 24, 144–157 (1956)
Jennings, N.R., Parsons, S., Noriega, P., Sierra, C.: On argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, Boston, USA, pp. 1–7 (1998)
Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multi-Agent Environments. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104(1–2), 1–69 (1998)
Larson, K., Sandholm, T.: An alternating offers bargaining model for computationally limited agents. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 135–142 (2002)
Lilien, G.L., Kotler, P., Moorthy, S.K.: Marketing Models. Prentice-Hall Press, USA (1992)
McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11(3), 315–334 (2002)
Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3), 261–292 (1998)
Rahwan, I., McBurney, P., Sonenberg, L.: Towards a theory of negotiation strategy (a preliminary report). In: Parsons, S., Gmytrasiewicz, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (GTDT 2003), pp. 73–80 (2003)
Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-Based Negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4), 343–375 (2003)
Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C.: Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: a rhetorical approach. In: Reed, C., Grasso, F., Carenini, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, pp. 9–17. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2003)
Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Rueda, S.V., García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Argument-based negotiation among BDI agents. Computer Science & Technology 2(7) (2002)
Slade, C.: Reasons to buy: The logic of advertisements. Argumentation 16, 157–178 (2002)
Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany (1995)
Zeuthen, F.L.B.: Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare. Routledge and Sons, London (1930)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rahwan, I., Sonenberg, L., McBurney, P. (2005). Bargaining and Argument-Based Negotiation: Some Preliminary Comparisons . In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3366. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24526-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32261-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)