Skip to main content

A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-agent Argument over Proposals for Action

  • Conference paper
Book cover Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3366))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present the syntax and semantics for a multi-agent dialogue game protocol which permits argument over proposals for action. The protocol, called the PARMA Protocol, embodies an earlier theory by the authors of persuasion over action which enables participants to rationally propose, attack, and defend, an action or course of actions (or inaction). We present an outline of both an axiomatic and a denotational semantics, and discuss an implementation of the protocol for two human agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Computational representation of persuasive argument. Technical Report ULCS-04-006, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Implementation of a dialogue game for persuasion over action. Technical Report ULCS-04-005, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldblatt, R.: Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon, T.F.: The Pleadings Game: An exercise in computational dialectics. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2, 239–292 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwood, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Towards a computational account of persuasion in law. In: Proc. Ninth Intern. Conf. AI and Law (ICAIL-2003), pp. 22–31. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Habermas, J.: Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996) (Translation by W. Rehg)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen, London, UK (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamblin, C.L.: Imperatives. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, R.: Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1993) (Two Volumes)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Labrou, Y., Finin, T., Peng, Y.: Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(2), 45–52 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luck, M., McBurney, P., Preist, C.: Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing. A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing, AgentLink II, Southampton, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. J. Logic, Language and Information 11(3), 315–334 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: A denotational semantics for deliberation dialogues. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, E., Tambe, M. (eds.) Proc.Third Intern. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.J.: Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Melzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence 4, pp. 463–502. Edinburgh University Press (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson, H.S.: Practical Reasoning about Final Ends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Salmon, W.C.: Causality and Explanation. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Tennent, R.D.: Semantics of Programming Languages. Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Toulmin, S.E.: Knowing and Acting: An Invitation to Philosophy. Macmillan, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walton, D.N.: The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P. (2005). A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-agent Argument over Proposals for Action. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3366. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32261-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24526-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32261-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics