Abstract
Spatial prepositions are linguistic tools to exchange information about spatial location of objects. For instance “The book is over the table” indicates that the located object (LO) is somewhere “over” the reference object (RO). Assigning direction to space (selecting a reference frame) is a necessary precursor to understanding where the LO is located. Three experiments are reported which investigated the effect of the orientation of both the LO and the RO on the acceptability of the prepositions above/below/over/under. We found that when the LO was not vertically aligned, the appropriateness for a given spatial preposition changes. In general scenes with the LO pointing at the RO were judged less acceptable than scenes with the LO vertically oriented. These results suggest that people generate reference frames for both LO and RO prior to assigning direction to space. Modifications to Multiple Frame Activation theory [1] are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Irwin, D.E.: Reference frame activation during spatial term assignment. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 646–671 (1994)
Levinson, S.C.: Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M.F. (eds.) Language and space, pp. 109–169. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Logan, G.D.: The influence of reference frame selection on spatial template construction. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 411–437 (1997)
Carlson, L.A., Logan, G.D.: Using spatial terms to select an object. Memory and Cognition 29(6), 883–892 (2001)
Carlson, L.A., West, R., Taylor, H.A., Herndon, R.: Neural correlates of spatial term use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, 1391–1408 (2002)
Logan, G.D., Sadler, D.D.: A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M.F. (eds.) Language and space, pp. 493–529. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Logan, G.D.: Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 28, 103–174 (1995)
Carlson, L.A.: (in press) What’s up, and where is it at? Using spatial language
Carlson, L.A.: Selecting a reference frame. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 365–379 (1999)
Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Logan, G.D.: The influence of reference frame selection on spatial template construction. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 411–437 (1997)
Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Jiang, Y.: Inhibition accompanies reference-frame selection. Psychological Science 9, 386–391 (1998)
Regier, T., Carlson, L.A.: Grounding spatial language in perception: An empirical and computational investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130(2), 273–298 (2001)
Lavie, N.: Perceptual load as necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance 21(3), 451–468 (1995)
Lavie, N., Cox, S.: On the efficiency of visual attention: efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science 8(5), 395–398 (1997)
Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C.: Saying, seeing and acting. The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Psychology Press, Hove (2004)
Coventry, K.R., Prat-Sala, M., Richards, L.: The interplay between geometry and function in the comprehension of Over, Under, Above and Below. Journal of Memory and Language 44(3), 376–398 (2001)
Regier, T.: The Human Semantic Potential. Spatial language and constrained connectionism. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Hayward, W.G., Tarr, M.J.: Spatial language and spatial representation. Cognition 55, 39–84 (1995)
Regier, T., Carlson, L.A., Corrigan, B.: Attention in spatial language: Bridging geometry and function. In: Carlson, L., van der Zee, E. (eds.) Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorization and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
Leek, E.C.: The analysis of orientation-dependent time costs in visual recognition. Perception 27(7), 803–816 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Burigo, M., Coventry, K. (2005). Reference Frame Conflict in Assigning Direction to Space. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds) Spatial Cognition IV. Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3343. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25048-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32255-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)