Abstract
This article describes an ontological model of norms. The basic assumption is that a substantial part of a legal system is grounded on the concept of agency. Since a legal system aims at regulating a society, then its goal can be achieved only by affecting the behavior of the members of the society. We assume that a society is made up of agents (which can be individuals, institutions, software programs, etc.), that agents have beliefs, goals and preferences, and that they commit to intentions in order to choose a line of behavior. The role of norms, within a legal system, is to specify how and when the chosen behavior agrees with the basic principles of the legal system. In this article, we show how a model based on plans can be the basis for the ontological representation of norms, linking them to the upper level of a philosophically well-founded ontology (DOLCE); in this way, the model is set in a wider perspective, which opens the way to further developments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourron, C.: Philosophical foundations of deontic logic and the logic of defeasible conditionals. In: Meyer, J.-J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification, pp. 43–84. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1993)
Allen, L.E., Saxon, C.S.: Better Language, Better Thought, Better Communication:The A-Hohfeld Language for Legal Analysis. In: Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM Press, New York (1995)
Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Task Neutral Ontologies, Common Sense Ontologies and Legal Information Systems. In: Proc. 2 nd Workshop on Legal Ontologies at Jurix, pp. 15–19 (2001)
Boella, G., Lesmo, L., Favali, L.: The Definition of Legal Relations in a BDI Multiagent Framework. In: Proc. of AI*IA 2001, pp. 225–236. Springer, Berlin (2001)
Boella, G., Lesmo, L.: A game theoretic approach to norms. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2 2(3-4), 492–512 (2002)
Boer, A., Hoekstra, R., Winkels, R.: The CLIME Ontology. In: Proc. 2nd Workshop on Legal Ontologies at Jurix, pp. 37–47 (2001)
Breuker, J., Valente, A., Winkels, R.: Legal Ontologies: A Functional View. In: Proc. of the First Workshop on Legal Ontologies, pp. 23–36 (1997)
Breuker, J., Winkels, R.: Use and Reuse of Legal Ontologies in Knowledge Engineering and Information Management. AI & Law (In press)
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS, vol. 2473, p. 166. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Guarino, N.: Some ontological principles for designing upper level lexical resources. In: Proc. First Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 1998), Granada (1998)
Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45, 61–65 (2002)
Hage, J., Verheij, B.: The Law as a Dynamic Interconnected System of States of Affairs: a Legal Top Ontology. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 54, 1043–1077 (1999)
Hart, H.: The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)
Herrestad, H., Krogh, C.: Obligations directed from bearers to counterparties. In: Proc.of 5 th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM Press, New York (1995)
Hohfeld, W.N.: Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven (1919)
Kelsen, H.: General Theory of Law and State (Wedberg trans.). Russell & Russell, New York (1945)
van Kralingen, R.W., Visser, P.R.S., Bench Capon, T.J.R., van den Herik, H.J.: A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 54, 1127–1154 (1999)
Lehmann, J., Breuker, J., Brouwer, B.: Causation in AI & Law. In: ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web Based Legal Information Management, Edinburgh, pp. 1–34 (2003)
Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: WonderWeb Deliverable D18. Ontology Library. Final Report (ver. 1.0, 31-12-2003)
Mommers, L.: A knowledge-based ontology of the legal domain. In: Proc. 2nd Workshop on Legal Ontologies at Jurix 2001, pp. 1–7 (2001)
Prakken, H., Sergot, M.: Dyadic deontic logic and contrary-to-duty obligations. In: Nute, D. (ed.) Defeasible Deontic Logic, pp. 223–262. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)
Ross, A.: Directives and norms. Humanities Press, New York (1968)
Stuckenschmidt, H., Stubkjaer, E., Schlieder, C.: Modeling Land Transactions: Legal Ontologies in Context. 2nd Workshop on Legal Ontologies at Jurix 2001, 58–66 (2001)
Tiscornia, D.: Ontology-driven Access to Legal Information. In: DEXA (2001)
Valente, A., Breuker, J., Brouwer, B.: Legal modelling and automated reasoning with ON-LINE. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 54, 1079–1125 (1999)
Visser, P.R.S., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: A comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 27–57 (1998)
van der Torre, L., Tan, Y.: Cancelling and overshadowing: two types of defeasibility in defeasible deontic logic. In: Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pp. 1525–1532. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1995)
von Wright, G.H.: Deontic logic. Mind 60, 1–15 (1951)
Welty, C., Guarino, N.: Supporting Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering 39, 51–74 (2001)
Winkels, R., Bosscher, D.J.B., Boer, A., Breuker, J.: Generating exception structures for legal information serving. In: Proc. ICAIL 1999, New York, pp. 182–189 (1999)
Winkels, R., Bosscher, D.J.B., Boer, A., Hoekstra, R.: Extended Conceptual Retrieval. In: Breuker, J.A., et al. (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems 2000, pp. 85–98. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boella, G., Lesmo, L., Damiano, R. (2005). On the Ontological Status of Norms. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds) Law and the Semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3369. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25063-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32253-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)