Skip to main content

Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies

  • Chapter
Law and the Semantic Web

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3369))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a number of basic types and roles of ontologies, and use them as a basis to analyze several legal ontologies in the AI and Law literature. We discuss some dimensions in which to distinguish types of ontologies, for example considering their level of structure. We propose five main roles of ontologies in general: (a) organize and structure information; (b) reasoning and problem solving; (c) se-mantic indexing and search; (d) semantics integration and interoperation; and (e) understanding the domain. We then discuss example of works that have exploited each of these roles in the AI and Law literature. Further, we discuss some of the consequences of using ontologies to play each of these roles in terms of the level of structure of the knowledge represented in the ontologies, the kinds of knowledge representation formalisms they use, and the reasoning methods they employ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LegOnt 2001: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies. Amsterdam, the Netherlands. URL http://www.lri.jur.uva.nl/jurix2001/legont2001.htm

  2. LegOnt 2003: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management. Edinburgh (2003), URL: http://www.lri.jur.uva.nl/~winkels/legontICAIL2003.html

  3. Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Valente, A.: Legal knowledge engineering: a modelling approach. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Valente, A., Breuker, J.: A functional ontology of law. In: Bargellini, G., Binazzi, S. (eds.) Towards a global expert system in law. CEDAM Publishers, Padua (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Genesereth, M.: Knowledge Interchange Format (KIF), http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/kif/

  7. Valente, A., Russ, T., MacGregor, R., Swartout, W.: Building, Using and Reusing an Ontology of Air Campaign Planning. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(1), 27–36 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Valente, A., Housel, T.: Analyzing and Maximizing ROI in Knowledge Management Tools. Knowledge Management Magazine (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gangemi, A., Sagri, M.T., Tiscornia, D.: Metadata for Content Description in Legal Information. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Bradford Books (May 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Asaro, C., Biasiotti, M.A., Guidotti, P., Papini, M., Sagri, M.T., Tiscornia, D.: A Domain Ontology: Italian Crime Ontology. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boer, A., Hoekstra, R., Winkels, R.: The CLIME Ontology. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zeleznikow, J., Stranieri, A.: An Ontology for the Construction of Legal Decision Support Systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamins, V.R., Contreras, J., Casanovas, P., Ayuso, M., Becue, M., Lemus, L., Urios, C.: Ontologies of Professional Legal Knowledge as the Basis for Intelligent IT Support for Judges. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saias, J., Quaresma, P.: Using NLP techniques to create legal ontologies in a logic programming based web information retrieval system. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leary, R.M., Vandenberghe, W., Zeleznikow, J.: Towards a Financial Fraud Ontology; A Legal Modelling Approach. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Valente, A., Breuker, J.: Towards Principled Core Ontologies. In: Gaines, B., Musen, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW 1996), Banff, pp. 33/1–33/20 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Valente, A., Breuker, J.: Legal Modelling and Automated Reasoning with ON-LINE. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 51(6), 1079–1125 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mommers, L.: Applied legal epistemology. Building a knowledge-based ontology of the legal domain. Ph.D. Thesis (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCarty, L.T.: A Language for Legal Discourse, I. Basic Features. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 180–189 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Kralingen, R.W.: Frame-based Conceptual Models of Statute Law, Computer/Law Series, vol. 16. Kluwer Law International, The Hague (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Visser, P.R.S.: Knowledge Specification for Multiple Legal Tasks. A Case Study of the Interaction Problem in the Legal Domain, Leiden University: Ph.D. thesis (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lehman, J., Breuker, J., Brower, B.: Causation in AI & Law. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Visser, P.: FRAMER: Source Code of a Legal Knowledge System that performs Assessment and Planning, Reports on Technical Research in Law, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands, vol. 2(1) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lame, G.: Using text analysis techniques to identify legal ontologies’ components. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davis, R., Shrobe, H., Szolovitis, P.: What is Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine 14(1), 17–33 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Visser, P., Bench-Capon, T.: A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law Journal 6(1) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guarino, N.: OntoWeb WP3 Content Standardization Month 18 report, available online at http://www.ontoweb.org/workshop/ontoweb4/Ontoweb4_files/WP3ReportM18.ppt

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valente, A. (2005). Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds) Law and the Semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3369. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25063-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32253-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics