Layering Social Interaction Scenarios on Environmental Simulation

  • Daisuke Torii
  • Toru Ishida
  • Stéphane Bonneaud
  • Alexis Drogoul
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3415)


For an integrated simulation such as the natural environment affected by human society, it is indispensable to provide an integrated simulator that incorporates multiple computational models. We proposed a multi-layer socio-environmental simulation by layering the social interaction scenario on environmental simulation. For this simulation, we connect two different systems. One is a scenario description language Q, which is suitable for describing social interactions. Another is CORMAS, which models interactions between a natural environment and humans. The key idea is to realize a mapping between agents in different systems. This integration becomes possible by the salient feature of Q: users can write scenarios for controlling legacy agents in other systems. Moreover, we find that controlling the flow of information between the two systems can create various types of simulations. We also confirm the capability of CORMAS/Q, in the well-known Fire-Fighter domain.


Cellular Automaton Multiagent System Environmental Simulation Fire Fighter Finite State Automaton 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Axtell, R.L., Epstein, J.M., Cohen, M.D.: Aligning Simulation Models: A Case Study and Results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 1, 123–141 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bah, A., Touré, I., Le Page, Ch.: An Agent-Based Model tool for multi-agent simulation for Understanding the Multiple Uses of space Land and Resources around a Drilling Sites in the Sahel. In: Proceedings of Modsim 2003 International Congress on Modeling and Simulation, pp. 1060–1065 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bousquet, F., Bakam, I., Proton, H., Le Page, C.: Cormas: common-pool resources and multi-agent Systems. In: Mira, J., Moonis, A., de Pobil, A.P. (eds.) IEA/AIE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1416, pp. 826–838. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen, P.R., Greenberg, M.L., Hart, D.M., Howe, A.E.: Trial by fire: Understanding the design requirements for agents in complex environments. AI Magazine 10(3), 32–48 (Fall 1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ishida, T.: Digital City Kyoto: Social Information Infrastructure for Everyday Life. Communications of the ACM (CACM) 45(7), 76–81 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishida, T.Q.: A Scenario Description Language for Interactive Agents. IEEE Computer 35(11), 54–59 (2002)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murakami, Y., Ishida, T., Kawasoe, T., Hishiyama, R.: Scenario Description for Multi-Agent Simulation. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2003), pp. 369–376 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakanishi, H., Nakazawa, S., Ishida, T., Takanashi, K., Isbister, K.: Can Software Agents Influence Human Relations? Balance Theory in Agent-mediated Communities. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2003), pp. 717–724 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noda, I., Stone, P.: RoboCup Soccer Server and CMUnited: Implemented Infrastructure for MAS Research. In: Wagner, T., Rana, O. (eds.) Infrastructure for Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Scalable Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 94–101 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perez, P., Ardlie, N., Kuneepong, P., Dietrich, C., Merritt, W.S.: CATCHCROP: modeling crop yield and water demand for integrated catchment assessment in Northern Thailand. Environmental Modelling and Software 17(3), 251–259 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daisuke Torii
    • 1
  • Toru Ishida
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stéphane Bonneaud
    • 3
  • Alexis Drogoul
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social InformaticsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.JST CREST Digital City Project 
  3. 3.LIP6Université Paris 6ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations