Skip to main content

Empirical Models Based on Hybrid Intelligent Systems for Assessing the Reliability of Complex Networks

  • Conference paper
  • 1535 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3449))

Abstract

This paper describes the application of Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS) in a new domain: the reliability of complex networks. The reliability of a network is assessed by employing two algorithms, TREPAN and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems ANFIS belonging to the HIS paradigm. TREPAN is a technique to extract linguistic rules from a trained Neural Network, and ANFIS is a method that combines fuzzy inference systems and neural networks. A numerical example, related to a complex network, illustrates the application of the approach and shows that HIS is a promising approach for reliability assessment. The structure function of the complex network analyzed is properly emulated by training both algorithms on a subset of possible system configurations, generated by a Monte Carlo simulation and an appropriate Evaluation Function. Both algorithms successfully describe the network status through a set of rules, which allows the reliability assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lynn, N., Singpurwalla, N.: Bayesian assessment of network reliability. SIAM Review 40, 202–227 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Billinton, R., Allan, R.: Reliability Evaluation of Engineering Systems, Concepts and Techniques, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubi, A.: Modeling of realistic system with the Monte Carlo method: A unified system engineering approach. In: Proc. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium – Tutorial Notes (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grimaldi, R.P., Shier, D.R.: Redundancy and reliability of communication networks, www.math.clemson.edu/~shierd/Shier/abstracts/randr.html

  5. Reingold, E., Nievergelt, J., Deo, N.: Combinatorial Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Papadimitriou, C.H., Steiglitz, K.: Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Aggarwal, K.K., Chopra, Y.C., Bajwa, J.S.: Capacity consideration in reliability analysis of communication systems. IEEE Trans. on Reliability 31 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Billinton, R., Allan, R.N.: Reliability Evaluation of Engineering Systems, Concepts and Techniques, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Rocco, C.M., Moreno, J.A.: Machine Learning Models for On-Line Dynamic Secu-rity Assessment of Electric Power Systems. In: Garijo, F.J., Riquelme, J.-C., Toro, M. (eds.) IBERAMIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2527. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Rocco, C.M.: A rule induction approach to improve Monte Carlo system reliability assessment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 82, 87–94 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rocco, C.M., Moreno, J.M.: Reliability evaluation using Monte Carlo simulation and support vector machine. In: Sloot, P.M.A., Tan, C.J.K., Dongarra, J., Hoekstra, A.G. (eds.) ICCS-ComputSci 2002. LNCS, vol. 2329, p. 147. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocco, C., Muselli, M.: Empirical models based on machine learning techniques for determining approximate reliability expressions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 83, 301–309 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobsen, H.A.: A Generic Architecture for Hybrid Intelligent Systems. IEEE Fuzzy Systems, Anchorage, Alaska (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jain, L.C., Martin, N.M.: Fusion of Neural Networks, Fuzzy Sets, and Genetic Algorithms, Industrial Applications. Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Craven, M.W.: Extracting Comprehensible Models from Trained Neural Networks. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin- Madison (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jang, J.S., Sun, C.T., Mizutani, E.: Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing. A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence. Ed. Prentice Hall, NJ (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~pris/HybridSystems/DescriptionDetailed1.html

  18. Jang, J.S.: ANFIS Adaptive-Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 23, 665–685 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin, C.T., Lee, C.S.G.: Neural Fuzzy Systems: A Neuro-Fuzzy Synergism to Intelligent Systems. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. http://divcom.otago.ac.nz/infoscie/kel/cbiis.htm

  21. Kasabov, N.: Investigating the Adaptation and Forgetting in Fuzzy Neural Networks Through a Method of Training and Zeroing. In: Proc.of ICNN 1996, vol. 1996, pp. 118–123 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kasabov, N.: On-line learning, reasoning, rule extraction and aggregation in locally optimized evolving fuzzy neural networks. Neurocomputing Issues 1-4, 25–45 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 15, 116–132 (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoo, Y.B., Deo, N.: A Comparison of Algorithm for Terminal-Pair Reliability. IEEE Transaction on Reliability 37(2), 210–215 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Veropoulos, K., Camppbell, C.N.: Controlling the Sensitivity of Support Vector Machines. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 1999 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Foresee, F.D., Hagan, M.T.: Gauss-Newton Approximation to Bayesian Regularization. In: Proc. of IJCNN 1997 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. MathWorks (2002) MatLab 6.5 R13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Torres D., D.E., Rocco S., C.M. (2005). Empirical Models Based on Hybrid Intelligent Systems for Assessing the Reliability of Complex Networks. In: Rothlauf, F., et al. Applications of Evolutionary Computing. EvoWorkshops 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3449. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32003-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32003-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25396-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32003-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics