Functional Characteristics and Indicators of Boreal Peatlands

  • Dale H. Vitt
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 188)

2.5 Conclusions

Zonobiome VIII is a mosaic of lakes, upland evergreen and deciduous forest, and peatlands. Most of the world’s peat-forming ecosystems occur in the boreal zone where they play important roles in carbon sequestration, erosional control, and landscape filtration. Peatlands are uniquely unbalanced ecosystems that are sensitive to the influences of hydrology, climate, and surrounding substrate. Peat-forming wetlands form two functional levels of organization: fens and bogs. Both of these grades develop deep deposits of peat and stabilize the landscape for long periods of time. Both are characterized by well-developed catotelms and ground layers dominated by bryophytes.


Boreal Zone Peatland Type Boreal Wetland True Moss Peat Column 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almquist-Jacobson H, Foster DR (1995) Toward an integrated model for raised-bog development: theory and field evidence. Ecology 76:2503–2516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson R, Foster DR, Motzkin G (2003) Integrating lateral expansion into models of peatland development in temperate New England. J Ecol 91:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer IE, Vitt DH (2003) Autogenic succession and its importance for the peatlands of Canada’s western boreal forest. In: Bauerochse A, Haßmann H (eds) Peatlands, archaeological sites — archives of nature — nature conservation — wise use. Proceedings of the peatland conference 2002, Hanover, Germany, pp 179–187Google Scholar
  4. Botch MS, Masing VV (1979a) Regionality in mire typology in the USSR. In: Classification of mires and peats. Proceedings of the international symposium, Hyytiala, Finland, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  5. Botch MS, Masing VV (1979b) Ekosistemy bolot SSSR. Nauka, St PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  6. Botch MS, Masing VV (1983) Mire ecosystems in the U.S.S.R. In: Gore AJP (ed) Ecosystems of the world 4B. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 95–152Google Scholar
  7. Cajander AK (1913) Studien über die Moore finnlands. Acta For Fenn 1:1–175Google Scholar
  8. Chee W-L, Vitt DH (1989) The vegetation, surface water chemistry, and peat chemistry of moderate-rich fens in central Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 9:227–262Google Scholar
  9. Clements F (1916) Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. The Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Damman AWH (1977) Geographical changes in the vegetation pattern of raised bogs in the Bay of Fundy region of Maine and New Brunswick. Vegetatio 35:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Damman AWH (1979) Geographic patterns in peatland development in eastern North America. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on classification of peat and peatlands. International Peat Society, Helsinki, pp 42–57Google Scholar
  12. Damman AWH (1986) Hydrology, development, and biogeochemistry of ombrogenous peat bogs with special reference to nutrient relocation in a western Newfoundland bog. Can J Bot 64:384–394Google Scholar
  13. Dierssen K, Dierssen B (2001) Moore (Ekosysteme Mitteleuropas aus geobotanischer Sicht). Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  14. DuRietz GE (1949) Huvudenheter och huvudgränser i svensk myrvegetation. Sven Bot Tidskr 48:274–309Google Scholar
  15. DuRietz GE (1954) Die Mineralbodenwasserzeigergrenze als Grundlage einer natürlichen Zweigliederung der nord-und mitteleuropäischen Moore. Vegetatio 5–6:274–309Google Scholar
  16. Eurola S (1962) Über die regionale Einteilung der südfinnischen Moore. Ann Bot Soc Vanamo 33:1–243Google Scholar
  17. Gignac LD, Vitt DH, Zoltai SC, Bayley SE (1991) Bryophyte response surfaces along climatic, chemical and physical gradients in peatlands of western Canada. Nova Hedwigia 53:27–71Google Scholar
  18. Glaser PH, Janssens JA (1986) Raised bogs in eastern North America: transitions in landforms and gross stratigraphy. Can J Bot 64:395–415Google Scholar
  19. Gore AJP (ed) (1983) Ecosystems of the world 4B. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorham E (1991) Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1:182–195Google Scholar
  21. Gorham E, Janssens J (1992) Concepts of fen and bog reexamined in relation to bryophyte cover and the acidity of surface waters. Acta Soc Bot Pol 61:7–20Google Scholar
  22. Heinselman M (1963) Forest sites, bog processes, and peatland types in the Glacial Lake Agassiz Region, Minnesota. Ecol Monogr 33:328–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horton DG, Vitt DH, Slack NG (1979) Habitats of circumboreal-subarctic Sphagna. I. A quantitative analysis and review of species in the Caribou Mountains, northern Alberta. Can J Bot 57:2283–317Google Scholar
  24. Inisheva LI, Golovatskaya EA (2002) Elements of carbon balance in oligotrophic bogs. Russ J Ecol 33:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivanov KE (1957) Osnovy gidrologii bolot lesnoi zony. Gidrometizdat, St PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  26. Joosten H, Clarke D (2002) Wise use of mires and peatlands — Background and principles including a framework for decision-making. International Mire conservation Group and International Peat Society, Finland, http://www.mirewiseuse.comGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz NY (1930) Zur Kenntnis der Moore Nordosteuropa. Beih Bot Centrabl 2:287–394Google Scholar
  28. Keddy PA, Fraser LH (2005) The world’s largest wetlands: ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Kratz TK, DeWitt CB (1986) Internal factors controlling peatland-lake ecosystem development. Ecology 67:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laitinen J, Rehell S, Huttunen A (2005) Vegetation-related hydrotopographic and hydrologic classification for aapa mires (Hirvisuo, Finland). Ann Bot Fenn 42:107–121Google Scholar
  31. Lewis FJ, Dowding ES (1926) The vegetation and retrogressive changes of peat areas (“muskegs”) in central Alberta. J Ecol 14:317–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lieth H (ed) (1999) Climate diagram world atlas. Backhuys, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakamura T, Uemura S, Yabe K (2002) Hydrochemical regime of fen and bog in north Japanese mires as an influence on habitat and above-ground biomass of Carex species. J Ecol 90:1017–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruuhijärvi R (1960) Über die regionale Einteilung der nordfinnischen Moore. Ann Bot Soc Vanamo 31:1–360Google Scholar
  36. Sjörs H (1948) Myrvegetation i Bergslagen (Mire vegetation in Bergslagen, Sweden). Acta Phytogeogr Suec 21:1–299Google Scholar
  37. Sjörs H (1950) Regional studies in north Swedish mire vegetation. Bot Not 1950:173–222Google Scholar
  38. Sjörs H (1983) Mires of Sweden. In: Gore AJP (ed) Ecosystems of the world 4B. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 69–94Google Scholar
  39. Tahvanainen T (2004) Water chemistry of mires in relation to the poor-rich vegetation gradient and contrasting geochemical zones of the northeastern Fennoscandian Shield. Folia Geobot 39:353–369Google Scholar
  40. Tansley AG (1939) The British Islands and their vegetation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Vitt DH (2000) Peatlands: ecosystems dominated by bryophytes. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 312–343Google Scholar
  42. Vitt DH, Chee W-L (1990) The relationships of vegetation to surface water chemistry and peat chemistry in fens of Alberta, Canada. Vegetatio 89:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vitt DH, Slack NG (1975) An analysis of the vegetation of Sphagnum-dominated kettle-hole bogs in relation to environmental gradients. Can J Bot 53:332–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vitt DH, Horton DG, Slack NG, Malmer N (1990) Sphagnum-dominated peatlands of the hyperoceanic British Columbia coast: patterns in surface water chemistry and vegetation. Can J For Res 20:696–711Google Scholar
  45. Vitt DH, Halsey LA, Zoltai SC (1994) The bog landforms of continental western Canada relative to climate and permafrost patterns. Arct Alp Res 26:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vitt DH, Bayley SE, Jin T-L (1995) Seasonal variation in water chemistry over a bog-rich fen gradient in continental western Canada. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:587–606Google Scholar
  47. Vitt DH, Halsey LA, Bauer IE, Campbell C (2000) Spatial and temporal trends of carbon sequestration in peatlands of continental western Canada through the Holocene. Can J Earth Sci 37:683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitt DH, Halsey LA, Bray J, Kinser A (2003) Patterns of bryophyte richness in a complex boreal landscape: Identifying key habitats at McClelland Lake wetland. Bryologist 106:372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Von Post L, Granlund E (1926) Södra Sveriges torvtillgångar I. Sver Geol Unders Ser C 335:127Google Scholar
  50. Walter H (1979) Vegetation of the earth and ecological systems of the geo-biosphere, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Weber C (1911) Das Moore. Hannoversche Geschichsbl 14:255–270Google Scholar
  52. Wetzel RG (1983) Limnology, 2nd edn. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  53. Wheeler BD, Proctor MCF (2002) Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires. J Ecol 88:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wieder RK, Lang GE (1983) Net primary production of the dominant bryophytes in a Sphagnum-dominated wetland in West Virginia. Bryologist 86:280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilcox DA, Simonin HA (1988) The stratigraphy and development of a floating peatland, Pinhook Bog, Indiana. Wetlands 8:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zoltai SC, Pollett FC (1983) Wetlands in Canada: their classification, distribution, and use. In: Gore AJP (ed) Ecosystems of the world 4B. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 245–268Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dale H. Vitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations