Advertisement

The Hydrology of Peatlands

  • Donald I. Siegel
  • Paul Glaser
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 188)

13.6 Conclusions

Hydrogeologic investigations over the past 20 years have largely confirmed the concepts developed by peatland ecologists that stress the close linkage between hydrology and peatland ecology. However, these studies have also shown how groundwater flow systems interacting with the climate, geology, and biota of large peat basins largely shape the ecological development of these waterlogged ecosystems. Hydrogeologic methodology therefore provides a rigorous quantitative approach based on first principles of chemistry and physics to constrain the largely empirical statistical methods favored by ecologists.

Keywords

Hydraulic Conductivity Groundwater Flow Hydraulic Head Peat Profile Annual Meeting Abstract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almendinger JC, Almendinger JE, Glaser PH (1986) Topographic fluctuations across a spring-fen and raised bog in the Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota. J Ecol 74:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modeling. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong AC (1995) Hydrogeological model of peat-mound form with vertically varying hydraulic conductivity. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 20:473–477Google Scholar
  4. Baden W, Eggelsmann R (1963) Zur Durchlässigkeit der Moorböden. Z Kult Tech 4:226–254Google Scholar
  5. Baird AJ, Gaffney SW (1994) Cylindrical piezometer responses in a humified fen peat. Nord Hydrol 25:167–182Google Scholar
  6. Beard J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckwith CW, Baird AJ (2001) The effect of biogenic gas bubbles on water flow through poorly decomposed blanket peat. Water Resour Res 37:551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belyea LR, Clymo RS (2001) Feedback control of the rate of peat formation. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 268:1315–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett PC, Siegel DI, Hill B, Glaser PH (1990) The fate of silica in a peat bog. Geology 19:328–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boelter DH (1969) Physical properties of peats related to degree of decomposition. Oil Sci Soc Am Proc 33:606–609Google Scholar
  11. Boelter DH, Verry ES (1977) Peatland water in the northern Lake States. U S Dep Agric Tech Rep NC-31:1–22Google Scholar
  12. Boldt DR (1986) Computer simulations of groundwater flow in a raised bog system, Glacial Lake Agassiz peatlands, northern Minnesota. MS thesis, Syracuse University, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown A, Mathur SP, Kushhner DJ (1989) An ombrotrophic bog as a methane/reservoir. Global Biogeochem Cycles 3:205–213Google Scholar
  14. Chason D, Siegel D (1986) Hydraulic conductivity and related physical properties of peat, Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota. Soil Sci 142:91–99Google Scholar
  15. Childs EC (1969) Introduction to the physical principles of soil water phenomena. Wiley, London, pp 338–340, 406–408Google Scholar
  16. Clark I, Fritz P (1997) Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. CRC, LewisGoogle Scholar
  17. Clymo RS (1984). The limits to peat bog growth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 303:605–654Google Scholar
  18. Clymo RS (1991) Peat growth. In: Shane LCK, Cushing EJ (eds) Quaternary landscapes. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  19. Dau JHC (1823) Neues Handbuch über den Torf. JC Hinrichsche Buchhandlung, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  20. Devito KJ, Waddington JM, Fowle BA (1997) Flow reversals in peatlands influenced by local groundwater systems. Hydrol Processes 11:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dinel H, Mathur SP, Brown A, Levesque M (1988) A field study of the effect of depth on methane production in peatland waters: equipment and preliminary results. J Ecol 76:1083–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faure G (1986) Principles of isotope geochemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Fechner-Levy E, Hemond HF (1996) Trapped methane volume and potential effects on methane ebullition in a northern peatland. Limnol Oceanogr 41:1375–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fetter CW (2000) Applied hydrogeology, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  25. Fraser CJD, Roulet NT, Lafleur PM (2001) Groundwater flow patterns in a large peatland. J Hydrol 246:142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeze RA, Witherspoon PA (1978) Theoretical analysis of regional groundwater flow: 1. Analytical and numerical solutions to the mathematical model. Water Resour Res 2:641–656Google Scholar
  28. Gilman K, Newsome MD (1980) Soil pipes and pipeflow — a hydrological study in upland Wales. British Geomorphological Research Group research monograph series, no 1. Geo Books, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  29. Glaser PH (1987) The development of streamlined bog islands in the interior of North America. Arct Alp Res 19:402–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glaser PH (1992) Raised bogs in eastern North America: regional controls on species richness and floristic assemblages. J Ecol 80:535–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glaser PH (2002) CA Weber’s benchmark treatise on the Augstumal bog: reflections on its impact and significance to peatland ecology. In: Couwenberg J, Joosten H (eds.) CA Weber and the raised bog of Augstmal. IMCG and Grif & K, Tula, pp 6–21Google Scholar
  32. Glaser PH, Janssens JA (1986) Raised bogs in eastern North America: transitions in landforms and gross stratigraphy. Can J Bot 64:395–415Google Scholar
  33. Glaser PH, Wheeler GA, Gorham E, Wright HE Jr (1981) The patterned peatlands of the Red Lake peatland, northern Minnesota: vegetation, water chemistry, and landforms. J Ecol 69:575–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glaser PH, Janssens JA, Siegel DI (1990) The response of vegetation to hydrological and chemical gradients in the Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota. J Ecol 78:1021–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glaser PH, Bennett PC, Siegel DI, Romanowicz EA (1996) Paleo-reversals in ground-water flow and peatland development; in the Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota, USA. Holocene 6:413–421Google Scholar
  36. Glaser PH, Siegel DI, Shen YP, Romanowicz EA (1997) Regional linkages between raised bogs and the climate, groundwater, and landscape features of northwestern Minnesota. J Ecol 85:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Glaser PH, Chanton JP, Morin P, Rosenberry DO, Siegel DI, Ruud O, Chasar LI, Reeve AS (2004a) Surface deformations as indicators of deep ebullition fluxes in a large northern peatland. Global Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB1003. DOI 10.1029/2003 GBO02069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Glaser PH, Siegel DI, Reeve AS, Janssens JA, Janecky DR (2004b). Tectonic drivers for vegetation patterning and landscape evolution in the Albany River region of the Hudson Bay lowlands. J Ecol 92:1054–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glaser PH, Hansen BCS, Siegel DI, Reeve AS, Morin PJ (2004c) Rates, pathways, and drivers for peatland development in the Hudson Bay lowlands, northern Ontario. J Ecol 92:1036–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gorham E (1953) Some early ideas concerning the nature, origin, and development of peat lands. J Ecol 41:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gorham E, Eisenreich SJ, Ford J, Sandtelmann MV (1985) The chemistry of bog waters. In: Stumm W (ed) The chemical processes in lakes. Wiley, New York, pp 330–363Google Scholar
  42. Hemond HF (1980) Biogeochemistry of Thoreau’s Bog. Concord, Massachusetts. Ecol Monogr 50:507–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hill BM, Siegel DI (1991) Groundwater flow and the metal content of peat. J Hydrol 78:1021–1048Google Scholar
  44. Hobbs NB (1986) Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats. Quart J Eng Geol Lond 19:7–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hogan JF, Blum JD, Siegel DI, Glaser PH (2000) 87Sr/86Sr as a tracer of groundwater discharge and precipitation recharge in the Glacial Lake Agassiz peatlands, northern Minnesota. Water Resour Res 36:3701–3710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hvorslev JM (1951) Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bulletin no 36, US Corps of Engineers, Waterway Experiment Station, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  47. Ingram HAP (1978) Soil layers in mires: function and terminology. J Soil Sci 29:224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ingram HAP (1982) Size and shape in raised mire ecosystems: a geophysical model. Nature 297:300–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ingram HAP (1983) Hydrology. In: Gore AJP (ed) Ecosystems of the world 4A. Mires: swamp, bog, fen, and moor. General studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 67–158Google Scholar
  50. Ivanov KE (1981) Water movement in mirelands. Translated by Thomson A, Ingram HAP (1975) Vodoobmen v bolotnykh landshaftakh. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Iverson J (1973) The development of Denmark’s nature since the last glacial. Reitzels, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  52. Jones JAA (1981) The nature of soil piping: a review of research. British Geomorphological Research Group research monograph series. Geo Books, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  53. Kneale P (1987) Sensitivity of the groundwater mound model for predicting mire topography, Nordic Hydrol 18:193–202Google Scholar
  54. Konikow LF, Bredehoeft JD (1992) Ground-water models cannot be validated. Adv Water Resour 15:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller P, Shaw GH, Glaser PH, Siegel DI (1992) Bedrock topography beneath the Red Lake peatlands. Geological Society of America, National Meeting, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  56. Nuttle WK, Hemond HF, Stolzenbach KD (1990) Mechanisms of water storage in salt marsh sediments: the importance of dilation. Hydrol Processes 4:1–13Google Scholar
  57. Ours DP, Siegel DI, Glaser PH (1997) Chemical dilation and the dual porosity of humified bog peat. J Hydrol 196:348–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Price JS, Schlotzhauer SM (1999) Importance of shrinkage and compression in determining water storage changes in peat: the case of a mined peatland. Hydrol Processes 13:2591–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reeve AS (1996). Numerical and multivariate statistical analysis of hydrogeology and geochemistry in large peatlands. PhD dissertation, Syracuse University, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
  60. Reeve AS, Siegel DI, Glaser PH (2000) Simulating vertical flow in large peatlands. J Hydrol 227:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reeve AS, Siegel DI, Glaser PH (2001) Simulating dispersive mixing in large peatlands. J Hydrol 242:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reynolds WD, Brown DA, Mathur SP, Overend RP (1992) Effect of in-situ gas accumulation on the hydraulic conductivity of peat. Soil Sci 153:397–408Google Scholar
  63. Romanowicz EA, Siegel DI, Glaser PH (1993) Hydraulic reversals and episodic methane emissions during drought cycles in mires. Geology 21:231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Romanowicz EA, Siegel DI, Chanton JP, Glaser PH (1995) Temporal variations in dissolved methane deep in the Lake Agassiz peatlands, Minnesota (USA). Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rosenberry DO, Glaser PH, Siegel DI, Weeks ED (2003) Use of hydraulic head to estimate volumetric gas content and ebullition flux in northern peatlands. Water Resour Res 39:1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roulet NT, McKenzie JW (1998) Role of groundwater in determining the pattern of peatlands in the Hudson Bay lowlands. Geological Society of America annual meeting abstracts with programs 30(7):A–119Google Scholar
  67. Rycroft DW, Williams DJA, Ingram HAP (1975) The transmission of water through peat. I. Review. J Ecol 63:535–556Google Scholar
  68. Siegel DI (1981) Hydrogeologic setting of the Glacial Lake Agassiz peatlands, northern Minnesota. US Geol Sur Water Resour Invest 81-24a:1–30Google Scholar
  69. Siegel DI (1983) Groundwater and the evolution of patterned mires, Glacial Lake Agassiz peatlands, northern Minnesota. J Ecol 71:913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Siegel DI (1988a) The recharge discharge function of wetlands near Juneau, Alaska: part I. Hydrologic investigations. J Ground Water 26:427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Siegel DI (1988b) The recharge discharge function of wetlands near Juneau, Alaska: part II. Geochemical investigations. J Ground Water 26:580–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Siegel DI, Glaser PH (1987) Groundwater flow in a bog-fen complex, Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota. J Ecol 75:743–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Siegel DI, Reeve AS, Glaser PH, Romanowicz E (1995) Climate-driven flushing of pore water in humified peat. Nature 374:531–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Siegel DI, Chanton JP, Glaser PH, Chasar LS, Rosenberry DO (2001) Estimating methane production rates in bogs and landfills by deuterium enrichment of pore-water. Global Biogeochem Cycles 15:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Siegel DI, Glaser PH, So J, Janecky DR (2006) The dynamic balance between organic acids and circumneutral groundwater in a large boreal peat basin. J Hydrol (in press)Google Scholar
  76. Sjörs H (1963) Bogs and fens on Attawapiskat River, northern Ontario. Nat Mus Can Bull Contrib Bot 171:1–31Google Scholar
  77. Sjörs H (1983) Mires of Sweden. In: Gore AJP (ed) Ecosystems of the world 4B. Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 69–94Google Scholar
  78. Van Seters T, Price JS (2001) The impact of peat harvesting and natural regeneration on the water balance of an abandoned bog, Quebec. Hydrol Processes 15:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Waddington JM, Roulet NT (1997) Groundwater flow and dissolved carbon movement in a boreal peatland. J Hydrol 191:122–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang H F, Anderson MP (1982) Introduction to groundwater models. Finite difference and finite element methods. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  81. Weber CA (1902) Über die Vegetation und Entstehung des Hochmoors von Augstumal im Memeldelta mit vergleichenden Ausblicken auf andere Hochmoore der Erde. Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  82. Wickman FE (1951) The maximum limiting height of raised bogs and a note on the motion of water in soligenous mires. Geol Foren Stockholm Foerh 73:413–422Google Scholar
  83. Wilcox DA, Shedlock RJ, Henderson WH (1986) Hydrology, water chemistry and ecological relations in the raised mound of Cowles Bog. J Ecol 74:1103–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Winston RB (1994) Models of the geomorphology, hydrology, and development of domed peat bodies. Geol Soc Am Bull 106:1594–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald I. Siegel
    • 1
  • Paul Glaser
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geology and GeophysicsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations