Abstract
The focus of this paper is the handling of overlapping solutions in evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) algorithms. In the application of EMO algorithms to some multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems, there exit a large number of overlapping solutions in each generation. We examine the effect of removing overlapping solutions on the performance of EMO algorithms. In this paper, overlapping solutions are removed from the current population except for a single solution. We implement two removal strategies of overlapping solutions. One is the removal of overlapping solutions in the objective space. In this strategy, one solution is randomly chosen among the overlapping solutions with the same objective vector and left in the current population. The other overlapping solutions with the same objective vector are removed from the current population. As a result, each solution in the current population has a different location in the objective space. It should be noted that the overlapping solutions in the objective space are not necessary the same solution in the decision space. Thus we also examine the other strategy where the overlapping solutions in the decision space are removed from the current population except for a single solution. As a result, each solution in the current population has a different location in the decision space. The effect of removing overlapping solutions is examined through computational experiments where each removal strategy is combined into the NSGA-II algorithm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Coello Coello, C.A., Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2002)
Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 6, 182–197 (2002)
Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable Multiobjective Optimization Test Problems. In: Proc. of 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 825–830 (2002)
Ishibuchi, H., Murata, T.: A Multi-Objective Genetic Local Search Algorithm and Its Application to Flowshop Scheduling. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 28, 392–403 (1998)
Ishibuchi, H., Yamamoto, T.: Effects of Three-Objective Genetic Rule Selection on the Generalization Ability of Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 608–622. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Ishibuchi, H., Yamamoto, T.: Fuzzy Rule Selection by Multi-Objective Genetic Local Search Algorithms and Rule Evaluation Measures in Data Mining. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 141, 59–88 (2004)
Ishibuchi, H., Yoshida, T., Murata, T.: Balance between Genetic Search and Local Search in Memetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Permutation Flowshop Scheduling. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 7, 204–223 (2003)
Jaszkiewicz, A.: Comparison of Local Search-based Metaheuristics on the Multiple Objective Knapsack Problem. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 26, 99–120 (2001)
Jaszkiewicz, A.: On the Performance of Multiple-Objective Genetic Local Search on the 0/1 Knapsack Problem - A Comparative Experiment. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 6, 402–412 (2002b)
Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: On Metrics for Comparing Non-dominated Sets. In: Proc. of 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 711–716 (2002)
Okabe, T., Jin, Y., Sendhoff, B.: A Critical Survey of Performance Indices for Multi-Objective Optimization. In: Proc. of 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 878–885 (2003)
Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 3, 257–271 (1999)
Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., da Fonseca, V.G.: Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 7, 117–132 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nojima, Y., Narukawa, K., Kaige, S., Ishibuchi, H. (2005). Effects of Removing Overlapping Solutions on the Performance of the NSGA-II Algorithm. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3410. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24983-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31880-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)