Skip to main content

Worst-Case and Average-Case Approximations by Simple Randomized Search Heuristics

  • Conference paper
STACS 2005 (STACS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3404))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In recent years, probabilistic analyses of algorithms have received increasing attention. Despite results on the average-case complexity and smoothed complexity of exact deterministic algorithms, little is known about the average-case behavior of randomized search heuristics (RSHs). In this paper, two simple RSHs are studied on a simple scheduling problem. While it turns out that in the worst case, both RSHs need exponential time to create solutions being significantly better than 4/3-approximate, an average-case analysis for two input distributions reveals that one RSH is convergent to optimality in polynomial time. Moreover, it is shown that for both RSHs, parallel runs yield a PRAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beier, R., Vöcking, B.: Random knapsack in expected polynomial time. In: Proc. of 35th STOC, pp. 232–241 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spielman, D.A., Teng, S.H.: Smoothed analysis: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time. In: Proc. of 33rd STOC, pp. 296–305 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hochbaum, D.S. (ed.): Approximation Algorithms for NP-Hard Problems. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 1087–1092 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Baeck, T., Fogel, D.B., Michalewicz, Z. (eds.): Handbook of Evolutionary Computation. Institute of Physics Publishing (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Droste, S., Jansen, T., Wegener, I.: On the analysis of the (1+1) evolutionary algorithm. Theoretical Computer Science 276, 51–81 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wegener, I., Witt, C.: On the optimization of monotone polynomials by simple randomized search heuristics. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing (2005) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Witt, C.: An analysis of the (μ+1) EA on simple pseudo-boolean functions. In: Deb, K., et al. (eds.) GECCO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3102, pp. 761–773. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Giel, O., Wegener, I.: Evolutionary algorithms and the maximum matching problem. In: Alt, H., Habib, M. (eds.) STACS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2607, pp. 415–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann, F., Wegener, I.: Randomized local search, evolutionary algorithms, and the minimum spanning tree problem. In: Deb, K., et al. (eds.) GECCO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3102, pp. 713–724. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Frenk, J.B.G., Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G.: The rate of convergence to optimality of the LPT rule. Discrete Applied Mathematics 14, 187–197 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Coffman, J.E.G., Whitt, W.: Recent asymptotic results in the probabilistic analysis of schedule makespans. In: Chrètienne, P., Coffman Jr., E.G., Lenstra, J.K., Liu, Z. (eds.) Scheduling Theory and its Applications, pp. 15–31. Wiley, Chichester (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graham, R.L.: Bounds on multiprocessing timing anomalies. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 17, 263–269 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Motwani, R., Raghavan, P.: Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. David, H.A., Nagaraja, H.N.: Order Statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Witt, C. (2005). Worst-Case and Average-Case Approximations by Simple Randomized Search Heuristics. In: Diekert, V., Durand, B. (eds) STACS 2005. STACS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31856-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31856-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24998-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31856-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics