Advertisement

Robust Frequency Domain Audio Watermarking: A Tuning Analysis

  • David Megías
  • Jordi Herrera-Joancomartí
  • Julià Minguillón
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3304)

Abstract

In this paper, a tuning analysis of a robust audio watermarking scheme is performed. The watermarking system analysed here uses a lossy compression (MPEG 1 Layer 3) method to identify the frequencies at which the marking bits will be embedded. Several tuning parameters affect the mark embedding and the mark reconstruction processes. In previous papers, these parameters have been tuned without any systematic methodology and, thus, the capacity, imperceptibility and robustness results of the watermarking scheme could be enhanced. As a final result of the tuning analysis, some tuning guidelines are suggested for the different parameters. In addition, the conclusions of this study can be extended to other spread spectrum watermarking schemes for audio. In particular, the robustness of this watermarking scheme can be enhanced whilst improving imperceptibility and reducing capacity, which is a somewhat counterintuitive result.

Keywords

Copyright protection Audio watermarking Frequency domain methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Swanson, M., Kobayashi, M., Tewfik, A.: Multimedia data-embedding and watermarking technologies. Proceedings of the IEEE 86(6), 1064–1087 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petitcolas, F., Anderson, R.: Evaluation of copyright marking systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Multimedia Systems 1999, pp. 574–579 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swanson, M.D., Zhu, B., Tewfik, A.: Current state of the art, challenges and future directions for audio watermarking. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 19–24. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Voyatzis, G., Pitas, I.: Protecting digital image copyrights: a framework. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19, 18–24 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox, I.J., Kilian, J., Leighton, T., Shamoon, T.: Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 6, 1673–1687 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swanson, M.D., Zhu, B., Tewfik, A.H., Boney, L.: Robust audio watermarking using perceptual masking. Elsevier Signal Processing, Special Issue on Copyright Protection and Access Control 66, 335–337 (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, W., Lee, J.C., Lee, W.D.: An audio watermarking scheme robust to MPEG audio compression. In: Proc. NSIP, Antalya, Turkey, vol. 1, pp. 326–330 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruhl, D., Bender, A.L.: Echo hiding. In: Anderson, R. (ed.) IH 1996. LNCS, vol. 1174, pp. 295–316. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bassia, P., Pitas, I., Nikolaidis, N.: Robust audio watermarking in the time domain. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 3, 232–241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Megías, D., Herrera-Joancomartí, J., Minguillón, J.: A robust frequency domain audio watermarking scheme for monophonic and stereophonic PCM formats. In: 30th Euromicro Conference, Rennes, France (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Domingo-Ferrer, J., Herrera-Joancomartí, J.: Simple collusion-secure fingerprinting schemes for images. In: Proceedings of the Information Technology: Coding and Computing ITCC 2000, pp. 128–132. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dittman, J., Steinebach, M., Lang, A., Zmudzinski, S.: Advanced audio watermarking benchmarking. In: Proceedings of the IS&T/SPIE’s 16th Annual Symposium on Electronic Imaging. Security, Steganography, andWatermarking of Multimedia Contents VI, Sant Jose, CA, US, vol. 5306 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Megías, D., Herrera-Joancomartí, J., Minguillón, J.: A robust audio watermarking scheme based on MPEG 1 layer 3 compression. In: Lioy, A., Mazzocchi, D. (eds.) CMS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2828, pp. 226–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jansson, T.: Homepage for BladeEnc (2001), http://bladeenc.mp3.no/
  15. 15.
    Domingo-Ferrer, J., Herrera-Joancomartí, J.: Short collusion-secure fingerprinting based on dual binary hamming codes. Electronics Letters 36, 1697–1699 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boneh, D., Shaw, J.: Collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data. In: Coppersmith, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 1995. LNCS, vol. 963, pp. 452–465. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Özer, H., Avcıbaş, I., Sankur, B., Memon, N.: Steganalysis of audio based on audio quality metrics. In: Proceedings of the IS&T/SPIE’s 15th Annual Symposium on Electronic Imaging. Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents V, Santa Clara, CA, US, vol. 5020 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Purnhagen, H.: SQAM - Sound Quality Assessment Material (2001), http://www.tnt.uni-hannover.de/project/mpeg/audio/sqam/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Megías
    • 1
  • Jordi Herrera-Joancomartí
    • 1
  • Julià Minguillón
    • 1
  1. 1.Estudis d’Informàtica i MultimèdiaUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations