Advertisement

Performance Analysis of a UML Micro-business Case Study

  • Katerina Pokozy-Korenblat
  • Corrado Priami
  • Paola Quaglia
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3267)

Abstract

This paper presents a technique to carry out performance analysis of UML specifications. We consider UML specifications composed of activity, sequence and deployment diagrams. Specifications are translated into the stochastic π-calculus, and quantitative analysis is then performed via the BioSpi tool. The approach is applied to a web-based Micro-business case study.

Keywords

Sequence Diagram Activity Diagram Parallel Composition Security Manager Composite Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caraguili, C., Piazza, D., Mura, I., et al.: Specification in UML of case studies. DEGAS project deliverable 24 (2002), http://www.omnys.it/degas/
  4. 4.
    DEGAS home page: http://www.omnys.it/degas/
  5. 5.
    Kalden, R., Mierick, I., Meyer, M.: Wireless Internet Access Based on GPRS. IEEE Personal Comm. 7, 8–18 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milner, R.: Communicating and Mobile Systems: the π-calculus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pokozy-Korenblat, K., Priami, C.: Toward extracting pi-calculus from UML sequence and state diagrams. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Compositional verification of UML models 2003. ENTCS (to appear, 2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Priami, C., Regev, A., Silverman, W., Shapiro, E.: Application of a stochastic name passing calculus to representation and simulation of molecular processes. Information Processing Letters 80, 25–31 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sangiorgi, D., Walker, D.: The π-calculus: a Theory of Mobile Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shapiro, E.: Concurrent prolog: a progress report. In: Shapiro, E. (ed.) Concurrent Prolog, vol. 1, pp. 157–187. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silverman, W., Hirsh, M., Houri, A., Shapiro, E.: The Logix system user manual, Version 1.21 - Concurrent Prolog, vol. II. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katerina Pokozy-Korenblat
    • 1
  • Corrado Priami
    • 1
  • Paola Quaglia
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Informatica e TelecomunicazioniUniversità di TrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations