Skip to main content

The Role of Environmental Management Systems in Enforcing Standards and Thresholds in the Context of EIA Follow-Up

  • Chapter
Standards and Thresholds for Impact Assessment

Part of the book series: Environmental Protection in the European Union ((ENVPROTEC,volume 3))

  • 1881 Accesses

Abstract

The effectiveness of Environmental Assessment (EA) depends on its ability to effect change in the way human activities impact the environment. Unfortunately, environmental professionals are all too familiar with a gap between protecting the environment ‘on paper’ (e.g. in the EIS and related documents) and destroying it ‘on the ground’ where the activities undergoing EA are implemented. To bridge this gap, EIA follow up contains the management component defined as “making decisions and taking appropriate action in response to issues arising from monitoring and evaluation activities” (Morrison-Saunder et al. 2003). Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) and Environmental Management Systems (EMS) are the main management tools which can improve EIA effectiveness during followup. This section considers the rationale for and the experience of using EMPs and EMS in the context of EIA and SEA with particularly attention to the role of standards and thresholds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cherp A., Watt A, Vinichenko V (forthcoming) SEA and Strategy Formation Theories.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review x(xx): xxx–xxx

    Google Scholar 

  • Emilsson S, Hjelm O (2002) Mapping Environmental Management Systems Initiatives in Swedish Local Authorities-a national survey.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer TB (2003) Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23:155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RB (2006) Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 24(3):170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodland R, Mercier J-R (1999). The Evolution of Environmental Assessment in the World Bank: from Assessment to Results. Washington, DC, Environment Department, The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee N, Walsh F (1992) Strategic environment assessment: an overview. Project Appraisal 7:126–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall R. (2001) Mitigation linkage: EIA follow up through the application of EMPs in transmission construction projects. Impact Assessment in the Urban Context, Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Cartagena, Colombia, IAIA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J (1998) Strategy Safari. New York, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunder A., Arts J, Baker J (2003) Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunder A, Bailey J (1999) Exploring the EIA/Environmental Management Relationship. Journal of Environmental Management 24(3):281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunder A., Baker J, Arts J (2003). Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J (2004) Exploring the Dimensions of EIA Follow-up. Impact Assessment for Industrial Development: Whose Business Is It? 24th annual meeting of the International Assosiation for Impact Assessment, Vancouver, Canada, IAIA

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble B, Storey K (2005) Towards increasing utility of follow-up in Canadian EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partidario MR, Arts J (2005) Exploring the concept of strategic environmental assessment follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23(3):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therivel R, Partidario MR (1996) The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London, Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cherp, A. (2008). The Role of Environmental Management Systems in Enforcing Standards and Thresholds in the Context of EIA Follow-Up. In: Schmidt, M., Glasson, J., Emmelin, L., Helbron, H. (eds) Standards and Thresholds for Impact Assessment. Environmental Protection in the European Union, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31141-6_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics